Hello Michael,welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian. You can learn more on thehow to edit page. Thenaming conventions andstyle guide pages are also useful. In future, please use thesandbox for testing.

If you have any questions, see thehelp pages or add a question to thevillage pump. If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at thevotes for deletion page. There is also avotes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.Angela 23:47, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Can you give details of the copyright status of the image ofSuzy Parker you recently uploaded? Unfortunately Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material unless specific permission has been given to release it under theGFDL under which the Wikipedia content is distributed. Public domain material of course is fine.

If you place information on [[Image:Sp-t05.jpg]], it would put our minds at ease about the issue.

I'dd love to see a picture of her on the article, but we do have to be careful ... --Morven 20:41, 18 Sep 2003 (UTC)</nowiki>

["retroactive continuity" not a portmanteau word ->Talk:Retcon]

Hi, could you cut down the size of the Cybill Shepard pic? It's too big for the page.RickK 02:26, 25 Sep 2003 (UTC)

The pic looks great! This size is less grainy, too.  :)RickK 01:06, 26 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Hi, Michael -- Despite my numerous changes I like theTrench coat article. If you don't like what I did to your opening sentence I won't fight if you restore it. Maybe the encyclopedia needs some breezier writing. The subject of the article should be bolded in the first sentence, though. I also put a redirect page atTrenchcoat.Trontonian 15:46, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Glad to have contributed to the article. Nice pic, by the way. I'm going to be following up some of the other articles about clothing. Thesafari jacket could probably be the subject of its own encyclopedia.Trontonian 23:06, 30 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Hi,Image:Jamth.PNG appears to be broken - all I see is a black box. Maybe you need to upload again? Regards,sannse 23:02, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I'll ask on the pump and see if it's just me (I cleared my cache and it still just looks like a black box to me). If others have the same problem then a reload might be best. I'll let you know :) --sannse 18:05, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I've uploaded a JPEG version for you atImage:Jamthund.jpg.¬ Dori 02:46, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Hi Michael, your new version didn't work, it seems it's a browser issue - Internet Explorer has problems displaying pngs. I've switched over to Dori's Jpg which solves the problem nicely :) --sannse 20:21, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Who keeps deleting my Ellen Bry Stub Article? I would like to see it left as is until I can get some decent biographical info on her... Please and Thanks,Michael Reiter.

That particular article is being deleted in accordance with point 4 on the list of "Candidates for speedy deletion" of theWikipedia:Deletion policy. I suggest you move the currentEllen Bry article toUser:Michael Reiter/Ellen Bry and work on it there until it's up to stub quality, at which time you can move it back. Cheers,Cyan 22:21, 28 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Merry Christmas All. Can somebody tell me why uploading has been disabled, and if it is effecting everybody on Wikipedia? Hope it's nothing I did.Michael Reiter.

It's to do with the current server problems. The technical types are having to fiddle round a lot to keep things going. Once things are more stable again (or once the new hardware is installed) we should get back things like uploading and searching. Regards --sannse 19:31, 31 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hello, all. What seems to be the matter? I can't seem to get my article on Barbara Bain to download. I hope some one can help...

Michael Reiter.

You OK now? Everything looks fine atBarbara Bain. --sannse 10:07, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Yes. Thanks for the come back.

J. Michael Reiter.*

• "J." for Jonathan.

Should we have an article on everybody who may have ever worn a hat?RickK 03:27, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know that I edited your recent changes to theJämthund images. Since wikipedia articles don't have authors as such--just many contributors--it's not really appropriate to refer to "the author". Also, descriptions of images in articles should generally talk about the image as it relates to the article. Hence none of the dog photos *in the articles* give the owners' names, dogs' names, and so on. But of course if anyone clicks on an image, they get the bigger version *and* the detailed description of the particular photo, as inImage:JamthundA.JPG orImage:BedlingtonTerriers_wb.jpg.

Given all that, I'm so sorry for the apparently recent loss of your friend. It is so hard to lose a dog. I lost my favorite last year, very suddenly, to an aggressive cancer (hemangiosarcoma), and even having 2 other dogs around, there's still a huge painful hole left by his absence. My sympathy is with you.Elf |Talk18:49, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Huh--You mean it's not 1994 any more? I still sometimes date my checks (not intentionally) '84, so who can tell--.Elf |Talk00:52, 19 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Michael,

There is already a link to theList of fictional dogs on theGerman Shepherd Dog page. That list includes Ace The Bat-hound. There are lots of famous fictional GSDs. I don't think we want to duplicate large portions of that list on the GSD page. If you don't think it is sufficient to rely on the list of fictional dogs, how about creating a page with aList of fictional German Shepherd Dogs, which would also include Ace? It would be challenging to keep the GSD only list up-to-date with respect to the all dogs list. I understand from Elf that this has been done on other dog breed pages. If you don't think this is acceptable, would you please go toTalk:German Shepherd Dog and explain why Ace is so exceptional that he needs to be linked directly from the GSD page. Thanks.DSurber 18:00, Oct 16, 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I'vestarted a drive to get users tomulti-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using theCreative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0Licenses or into thepublic domain if they prefer. TheCC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, theGFDL, but it allowsother projects, such asWikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among thetop 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or atminimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options atTemplate messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using theGFDL, I would like to know that too.Please let me know what you think at mytalk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. --Ram-Man (comment|talk)

You mentioned that you'd like to take advantage of multi-licensing. It's pretty simple, and the simplest way is to copy and paste the following into your user page (orUser:Michael Reiter/Copyright): "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}". Once you copy it in, just save it and it will create a banner which lets everyone know that you've agreed to the terms of the CC-by-sa. –Ram-Man^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 13:29, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

You wrote "I believe it is, because I got it from www.us.imdb.com before they cracked down on downloaders... It must be okay, because that's where I got it from; before the afore mentioned site's crackdown."

I apologize, but I have no idea what you mean. –Quadell^{(talk) (sleuth)} 17:32, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)

I've putImage:MicroSamanthaEggar.JPG up fordeletion sinceImage:SamanthaEggar.jpg is a larger version. You can specify the width of an image so there's no need to upload multiple images of different sizes. For example:

• 150 pixels wide:
• 100 pixels wide:

Cburnett 06:40, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

YourImage:Krypto Resolved.JPG is marked "Public Domain, Fair Use". It can't be both, so which is it? --Paul A 02:20, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi, User:Paul_A. I'm Michael Reiter. Public Domain is the one to go with.

Sorry about the confusion...

User:Michael_Reiter

Is it? On what basis? I wouldn't have thought that there's been time for the image to have fallen into the public domain in the usual way. --Paul A 01:31, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi, CBurnett. Michael Reiter here. If you want, go ahead and tell whoever the sysadmin is, to deleteImage:MicroSamanthaEggar.JPG please and thanks...

User_Talk:Michael_Reiter.

Hi Michael.

I usedAdobe Photoshop CS2 to edit the 'Martin Landau, Barbara Bain ...' image. The picture should look better on most monitors, but if you don't like what I've done to your image then you can go back to the original one by clicking on the '(rev)' radio-button, which will revert to the previous (i.e., your original) upload. Regards,Ian Dunster 19:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi again Michael. Glad you liked the altered image. You can download a free trial copy of Photoshop CS2 from the Adobe website here:Adobe Photoshop CS2 but it's an expensive (professional) program so if you don't feel like paying so much for something that you won't be using a lot then Adobe do a cut-down (but still very good) home version calledPhotoshop Elements (here:Photoshop Elements) which is alot cheaper and may well do everthing that you need.

BTW, You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. it 'signs' your name (like mine below) and using four adds the date so that people know when you left them the message and provides a link back to you.

Regards,Ian Dunster 10:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Greetings. I didnot create those pages. There is a very persistent troll who impersonates me (and other users) using names like Quadeii and Quade11 etc. and generally causing as much trouble as possible. I've blocked every account I can find that he uses, but he's persistent. Sorry that you've been bothered by the guy as well. –Quadell^{(talk) (sleuth)} 11:02, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

You could list the vandalism onWP:VIP. . . or you could start aRequest for comments, not that it would do any good. . . or you could just ignore him, which may be your best option. Cheers, –Quadell^{(talk) (sleuth)} 16:29, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I heard of her. I might try her. :) But, she sounds like Horatio Hornblower, doesn't she?Painbearer 18:04, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

Letitia Lerner is Superman's Babysitter. She appeared in an Eisner Award-winning comic by Kyle Baker. --Fritz S. 18:01, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

I don't have access to any passwords, but I forwarded your requesthere. –Quadell^{(talk) (sleuth)} 01:05, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Where you try to log in, click the "E-mail new password" button. It will e-mail you a new password to your e-mail account. –Quadell^{(talk) (sleuth)} 14:51, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

"getting the bum's rush" (a) means nothing to probably a large portion of the encyclopedia's readers--it's a colloquialism and not necessarily a widely spread one, and (b) adds nothing at all to the understanding of the German Shepherd breed. The comment just doesn't belong in the caption in the article.It can be on the image's description page all you want, because that page is about the image, but I don't see how it adds value--and in fact confuses the issue--on the GSD page. Can you clarify why you think it does belong there? Thanks.Elf |Talk22:15, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When you set a tag like{{promophoto}} you are asserting that the source of the image is known, not just to you, but to Wikipedia as a whole. This is not the case in the images that you have recently added this tag to. Can you, please, cite the URL or other source from which you got those images? It's actually strong Wikipedia policy that all images must have source attribution. Thank you. -Harmil04:14, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, by adding that template, you added this text to those images:

If you believe that this image may be used by Wikipedia and by all other licensees under the fair use doctrine, then please add a detailed fair use rationale as described on Wikipedia:Image description page to justify this belief.

You have not done this. -Harmil04:18, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to do withImage:Orange_flight_suit.jpg being listed for deletion, other than having been the one to point out that it was listed without source information. I do imagine that it will be deleted, though. Generally Wikipedia has to be pretty strict about knowing the origin and copyright status of its images in order to comply with the applicable U.S. laws. -Harmil16:33, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We've discussed this before, but clearly it needs to be said again: I request that you review your recent image edits, and where the template that you are using suggests that a source is known, please list the source. Image sourcing is becoming an increasingly important topic on Wikipedia, and I can guarantee that any image that you do not source will be deleted at some point in the future (not by me) unless its source is painfully obvious, and even then there is substantial question around the legality of assumiung the source of the image.

If you are uploading / editing images because you want them to remain on Wikipedia, list the URLs, photographers, artists, scanned source material or whatever other information you can come up with for the source of the images. If you do not, you are acting in direct violation of Wikipedia policy, and there's very little chance that your work will remain. -Harmil13:28, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a fair use rationale for the two "safari jacket" images. Do not simply remove the "disputed" tag. The image talk page would be the ideal place to provide such a rationale. Please seeWikipedia:Fair use for details.The Uninvited Co.,Inc.16:28, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the "nosource" image tag from any image unlesss the source for the image has been identified. Proper identification of the source would ordinarily consist of the name and address of the photographer or copyright holder and the approximate date the photograph was taken.The Uninvited Co.,Inc.16:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus was (by others, not me) that there was weak fair use justification (See attached discussion) to keep the images and a free replacement could easily be made (although no one has stepped up to create one). I got tired of arguing about it and went with the consensus. Sorry --Nv8200p(talk)17:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Pgsafjak3.JPG Previously at IFD but moved here at request of the admin who closed the IFD discussion. This is clearly not fair use, since the object in the photo rather than thephoto itself is being discussed in the article where it is used.The Uninvited Co.,Inc.16:06, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't get this argument. Almost every fair use image we have is about the object in the image rather than thephoto itself --Nv8200p(talk)17:49, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The real question is not so much this object/subject stuff as, Can a freely licensed replacement be made? In this case it can, easily. Fair use should be resorted to when alternatives are absolutely unavailable or unreasonably impractical. --Michael Snow18:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whats the point of ifd if the images dont get deleted. As has been pointed out a free image would take someone no time to make, the fair use justification is dubious in the extreme, why do we have to go through PUI? The image is not free, so PUI shouldnt have to apply.Justinc15:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have a pretty weak fair use claim for this, sodelete.JYolkowski //talk23:48, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Número uno - tone it down three or four notches,BOLD CAPS and multiple exclaimation marks don't impress anyone, and don't take it so personally (and "do not deleteTHE image"? Huh?)

Número dos - I'm not listing it as "no source" or "no licence", so it being "uploaded with all the appropriate information!!!!" is irrelevant. And if I was, I would just tag it rather than sending it toWP:IFD.

Número tres - it IS washed out. The blacks are browns, the white is beige. And the red on his badge is yellow. -SoM19:07, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh so witty - did it take you a whole day to think up a way to "say" fuck you ('cause that's what the caps do) without actually "saying" it?

WP:FU -SoM21:17, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CLICK THE FRELLING LINK. It was intended as more than a clue.

And I really get the feeling I don't want to engage with you. NO, it was not "fuck you." I don't know you, I don't care about you, so WTH would I put the effort into a personal slight?

If you respond again, I won't respond back. -SoM16:43, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael. Sorry for the delay in replying. I think that when he wrote 'FU' he was actually referring to 'Fair Use' i.e., the tag under which the image was on Wikipedia (WP)

Sounds like you may have your wires crossed a little! :)

BTW, the image doesn't look too bad to me. I thinkUser talk:Mel Etitis may be an administrator but I'm not sure. Regards,Ian Dunster11:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am an admin., but you don't really need one; you just need to vote to keep the image (atWikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2005 October 31). You andSoM seem to have managed a series of escalating misunderstandings, in which you each thought the other was being abusive; it's clear, though, that neither of you was. If you can both take a few deep breaths and try again, you might still disagree over the image, but at least you can disagree in a friendly fashion. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης)21:27, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? --Nv8200p(talk)18:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Right where you uploaded it -Image:Vance Astro.JPG. If you are seeing a red x in a box in the upper left corner, it means the server is having trouble getting you the image, but I am seeing it. -Nv8200p(talk)18:27, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just concerning your many "it's 20 years old newsprint, what do you expect"s.

Done in about 5 mins using your scan in afreeware multi-platform program... (I watermarked it because I belatedly remembered theWPT:CMC discussions about Handbook images in the midst of this mess.).

http://tinypic.com/ff6zoj.jpg -SoM19:47, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the company that produced these images is defunct (which you have not documented), what makes you think the images have reverted to public domain? -Nv8200ptalk16:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just write it in the image description page. But that does not solve the issue of how you can claim their copyrights passed into the public domain. Some other company may have bought their intellectual property when Eaton folded -Nv8200ptalk17:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then whoever bought their intellectual property owns the copyright to those two images. You cannot just claim public domain. Maybe best just to let them be removed from Wikipedia unless their current copyright owner and copyright status can be verified. -Nv8200ptalk18:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This media may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Trenchcoatinuse.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use{{GFDL}} to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please readfair use, and then use a tag such as{{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -SCEhardT06:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This media may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Jamth.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use{{GFDL}} to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please readfair use, and then use a tag such as{{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -SCEhardT06:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This media may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Pwsafarijacket.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use{{GFDL}} to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please readfair use, and then use a tag such as{{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -SCEhardT06:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael - Thanks for getting back to me about these! I am confused as to why you have placed{{CopyrightedFreeUse}} on the two jacket photos. This tag has essentially the same meaning as{{PD-release}}. Did the authors waive their copyrights? -SCEhardT16:39, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are misunderstanding how copyright laws work. Take a look atPublic_domain#Expiration. Unless the work was published before 1923 or the author has been dead for 70 years, the work is not in public domain in the United States. Also, placing a picture on an eBay auction does not mean the author has released it into public domain. -SCEhardT21:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto forImage:Plfts.jpg. Thanks,JYolkowski //talk

This media may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Aa-lbp04.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under afair use license. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Additionally, please note that I removed this image from theAnne Archer article because film screenshots are not considered fair use on Wikipedia unless you are critiquing or otherwise discussing the film in question.cholmes75 (chit chat)16:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These terms refer toWikipedia's No Original Research policy. (OR = Original Research)David Bergan22:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Helena1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice byOrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions.12:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Pretty Lady Copy.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the{{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as{{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Fritz S. (Talk)10:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Barbara_Eden.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice byOrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions.06:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Spy2helena66.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok☠20:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Turasatana.jpg

—Chowbok☠22:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Susan Saint James.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Rossrs13:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:CatherineBellasLtColSarahMcKenzieUSMCJAG.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (seeour fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message fromBJBot08:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:PdPH2CC0001.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩19:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Hr_sptmz0002.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice byOrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions.07:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Anne archer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (seeour fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot03:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Barbara Eden.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot21:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Barbara_Bain,_Martin_Landau_and_Catherine_Schell.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the{{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under anon-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) thenthe image will be deleted48 hours after 08:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.MER-C08:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:BarbaraFeldon.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per ourFair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.MER-C08:51, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,Image:Vance Astro.JPG, has been listed atWikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.J Greb01:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your ease of finding the IfDWikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 October 2#Image:Vance Astro.JPG. If you want to start a discussion there, fine by me, but I'll respond to your post to my talk here instead of kicking off an awkward thread there.

And looking there you will note another 6 images clustered around your upload that have been IfDed for the same reason, with link. Again, for your convenience the link isWikipedia:WikiProject Comics/copyright#Images which cannot be "fair use". Please note this derives from an over all policy/guideline with clarifications for comic book articles.

As for a better idea. While keeping in mindWikipedia:WikiProject Comics/editorial guidelines#Superhero box images, look through the comics, including covers, where the character appeared in the story. There should be a number of good candidate images there for both the "classic" and Major Victory costumes. Just steer clear of the Handbooks and Handbook like pages. -J Greb16:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:SamanthaEggar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the{{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under anon-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) thenthe image will be deleted48 hours after 17:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Davepape17:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:SUZYPARKERANDCOLLINWILCOXPREOP.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Ricky81682 (talk)04:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I copied your pic of Samantha Eggar and imported it in Wikimedia Commons french (for Wikipedia french). But i received a warning about the license.

Van Rijn.—Precedingunsigned comment added by82.67.12.72 (talk)19:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Joanne Tranquille I saw the picture of your dog and actually took a double take for I thought it was a picture of my dog Jessie. They could be sisters for they look identical. Jessie is 14 going on 15. She came to us many years ago, she was badly abused. It took me 6 weeks to get near her but she has been such a fantastic dog and we love her dearly. We always thought that she was a shepard part wolf until I met a breeder and informed us that she might be related to another breed but diffenitly not shepard or wolf. When I came across the picture that you had posted of your dog I was so glad to find out her bread.I wish to thank you for posting Joanne—Precedingunsigned comment added by24.129.231.98 (talk)05:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Moonlighting-Shakespeare02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk)23:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Barbara2.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia'scriteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them atWikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.STBotI (talk)20:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Electric Blue Ski Jacket Snow Queen With Her Head Back E .jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set ofimage copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag fromthis list, click onthis link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message onWikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk)20:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:Safari Bush Jacket Baroness aka Susan Anton B.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takescopyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine thelicense and thesource of the file. If you know this information, then you can add acopyright tag to theimage description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.Polly (Parrot)00:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Fpckk.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe file description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L)21:20, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Helena Russell and John Koenig in Space 1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk)05:57, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Electric Blue Ski Jacket Snow Queen With Her Head Back E .jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ТимофейЛееСуда.20:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Yondu Udonta.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page, and edit it to include anon-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)19:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael Reiter. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.Mdann52 (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael Reiter. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael Reiter. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael Reiter. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians with public domain text contributions