Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21

This page has archives. Sections older than30 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

It has been suggested as to whetherhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_David_Amess#Should_this_article_reflect_trial_accounts_of_the_attack/Ali%E2%80%99s_behaviour? |date=December 2023}} we should expand with full on accounts of the attack in the church, especially with what emerged during the trial, much like how various terrorist attack articles go into detail as to what happened. If it is felt that the article is fine with no need to expand, all is well.78.150.8.113 (talk)19:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was reverted - rightly in my view - byMartinevans123 because it contained too much extraneous detail. Wikipedia articles are not news stories and should leave this to the citations at the foot of the article. This is best raised atTalk:Murder of David Amess for further input.♦IanMacM♦^{(talk to me)}20:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your help to make minor edits to the article "Djan Khoe". I am the subject of the article and started to do the edits myself but the actions were not appreciated. So I am looking for an editor who has the time and motivation to that for me.Khoe0005 (talk)20:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The biggest problem atGiok Djan Khoe is that it is almost entirely a list of his works and awards, and does not contain any background material about him as a person. Giok Djan Khoe meetsWP:NPROF, but the article scope needs to be widened so that it reads more like a biography.--♦IanMacM♦^{(talk to me)}07:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Vincent Price Thriller.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]