Hi, you recently undid my merge of theUndeclared episode list in the main article, stating "I beg to differ. This should be discussed first". I started adiscussion, and would like to hear your opinion. Another editor has weighed in, and agreed it should be merged. Thank you.Drovethrughosts (talk)21:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you plan on responding? I'll let it go another couple of days, then I'm just going to undo the edits and re-merge, as another editor has agreed with the merge, and you've yet to explain your reasons against it. Thank you.Drovethrughosts (talk)21:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I just checked back on the 90s Disney cartoon episode guides, to find they had been screwed up again. I am convinced that 74.199.8.30 and 76.112.31.81 are the same person. They keep citing the incorrect dates on TV.com and IMDB - I'm also an IMDB contributor, and I've fixed those dates TWICE and someone keeps changing them back to the wrong ones - I have a hunch it's the same person!

I don't know how to report incidents or sockpuppetry, but I know you've had to deal with this guy, so if you know anyone who could file a report, I'd love to put this madness to an end.

--TServo2050 (talk)18:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toThe Avengers: United They Stand may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• a few of them already worked on this show, and [[Hulk (comics)|Bruce Banner/The Incredible Hulk]]) was supposed to appear to help the team when Henry Pym/Ant Man fell ill to gamma radiation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)07:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think I did that link fully, but when I went back to fix it, it had already been, although I'm the last one to edit the page. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)08:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedList of Ultimate Spider-Man episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMidtown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you take the movie Masters of the Universe of the DC Movie list, He-Man is a DC Comic character therefore the movie is a DC Movie and needs to be on that list.— Precedingunsigned comment added byJmatt41494 (talk •contribs)17:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link that will show you that He-Man is a DC Comic characterhttp://www.comicvine.com/he-man/4005-16423/— Precedingunsigned comment added byJmatt41494 (talk •contribs)17:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That link only proved they are one of few publishers.Mattel owns the franchise. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)20:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well obviously you don't know anything about He-Man. By Wikipedia's own information He-Man and the Masters of the Universe is only done now by DC Comics, Marvel and Image don't publish He-Man anymore as it says herehttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masters_of_the_Universe_(comics). Image Comics (MV Creations): November 2002 - December 2004, Marvel Comics: May 1986 - May 1988, DC Comics: December 1982 - February 1983 July 2012 - ongoing. Therefore He-Man is DC.Mattel, DC Comics, and Filmation got together in the 1980s to come up with a new superhero that could explain to kid the lessons of right from wrong. So in 1982 Mattel came up with He-Man and the Masters of the Universe toys so DC could have a feel of what the characters and world would look like, and so in December 1982 DC did there first He-Man comic and in 1983 Filmation did the first cartoon series.— Precedingunsigned comment added byJmatt41494 (talk •contribs)20:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, DC is one of few publishers that have doneMasters of the Universe comics in the past, and now are thecurrent licencee from a property thatMattel wholly owns. DC has nothing whatsoever to do withHe-Man andMasters of the Universe outside of their own comics, which they could always stop doing. Saying that DC ownsHe-Man is like saying they ownLooney Tunes andScooby-Doo simply because they're giving the license to run a comic book based on them. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)22:24, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TheMasters of the Universe (film) page itself also makes no mention of DC. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)22:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'll let you believe what ever you want, I'm not going to argue with you, but if He-Man is DC and DC doesn't own rights then why is DC making a reboot movie of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe?— Precedingunsigned comment added byJmatt41494 (talk •contribs)23:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They're not making a reboot. What's your source? --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)06:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedList of Jonny Quest episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesSouth Pacific andAmazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The list ofJonny Quest episodes should not have its own page if the original series only ran for one season. --StewieBaby05 (talk)20:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem? The fact that there's only 1 season or 26 episodes? --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)21:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anythingspossibleforapossible. You have new messages atTalk:Scooby-Doo!_Mystery_Incorporated#Character.2FCast_section.
Message added 17:51, 27 February 2015 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, you are invited to weigh in on a discussion surrounding the inclusion of an expanded Character list in the related article.Cyphoidbomb (talk)17:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when you get a moment, can you please go toTalk:Inspector Gadget (2015 TV series) and write up a clear explanation for the dispute you're having with Gatordragon? All I see are two people edit-warring, neither has taken the initiative to open a discussion, and you both are at risk of violating 3RR. The more detail you can provide for why you object to his edits, the better. Much appreciated, thanks.Cyphoidbomb (talk)16:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I was going to do next anyway. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)17:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Cyphoidbomb (talk)19:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to insist on adding horizontal rules, then please do it for all seasons, not just one, otherwise it is inconsistent, which is why it was reverted in the first place. There is no valid reason to do it only for one season. --AussieLegend (✉)13:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. But you also said it was unnecessary when it was. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)14:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. At least one ofyour recent edits, such as the edit you made toList of What's New, Scooby-Doo? episodes, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will bereverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please usethe sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.
You made an unexplained revert that removed the DISPLAYTITLE magic word, violatedWP:TVOVERVIEW, and added non-compliant colours according toWP:COLOR.Alex|The|Whovian^?00:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained revert? I wasn't explicit, no. But I did say something. I didn't waste my time for nothing. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)00:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, to remove one or two things that you could remove manually yourself, you instead revert the article to a state of disrepair? That is extremely lazy editing.Alex|The|Whovian^?00:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did itreally look like it was in a state of disrepair? I don't think so. Keep it vandalised if you wish. It's just nice to get thanked. Oh, wait... --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)01:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I did, per what I added above on the end of my first post on your talk page. Is it truly so hard to remove them manually, instead of reverting valid edits as well?Alex|The|Whovian^?01:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same can be said about what you want done. It just proves the point that Wikipedia will always be a joke to the general public. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)09:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well. Minus the fact that the edits I have made comply affect the article on a greater scale, and make the article comply with multiple guidelines given for television episode articles. And by removing everything, you violate these guidelines. If you're too lazy to help fix this "joke", then tell me what needs removing, and I'll do the hard work myself.Alex|The|Whovian^?09:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You make it make sound like it looked perfect. Well, it wasn't. I really think you'd prefer that vandalism for the sake of a few superficial layout issues, that like I said didn't make the page look any better than it already did. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)11:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, great work!Alex|The|Whovian^?12:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was worried I might have worked back from a previous version again. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)14:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really relevant, so moving this to your talk page.

Well, yeah, but if the One-Shot isn't valid and the TV show has superseded it, then aren't the other One-Shots equally invalid and equally superseded by the other TV shows (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., for example)? We then have severe problems with, say,The Consultant (without which nothing in 2008'sIncredible Hulk film appears to be in continuity with the rest of the MCU, as Secretary Ross in the new film might as well be a different character from General Ross who happens to have the same name and be played by the same character) andAll Hail the King (without which the life is a lot less fun ;) ), and we have Joss Whedon apparently (haven't double-checked this) saying that in his mindAgents isn't canon and Coulson is still dead; it's also alot easier to synchronize the films' history of HYDRA with the One-Shots (which don't even touch on it) than with season 3 ofAgents; and it seems very likely that none of the movies willever tie anything back to the Netflix shows.

This shit gets really messy when one starts thinking about it too much, which I can understand making other users reluctant to cite any coverage of it that doesn't come from "official" sources in the articles proper, but it sure is a lot of fun to talk about.

Frankly, I can see the whole MCU falling apart and needing to be rebooted not long afterInfinity War. I think it's quite likely that at some point in the near future Marvel will get back the rights to everything in theFantastic Four universe, and it would be easier at that point to just reboot than try to incorporate it all retroactively.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや)15:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hijiri88, I see your point about not discussing there. Your side is interesting. I remember Joss saying how he was glad the Avengers didn't find out Coulson was alive inAge of Ultron, as that would've ruined his death in the first film, but I don't think I ever saw read about him thinkingAgents is non-canon. But considering the problems with theAgent Carter one-shot, what's canon and what's not canon causes all kinds of issues. It's likeAll Hail the King setting up a possible appearance from the real Mandarin, except it's just a one-shot, like what they did for Carter. And like I said forCarter, that film was set five years (I think) afterFirst Avenger, which conflicts with what was done in the TV series. I also think another problem will be that the films and TV shows are done by different departments. The TV shows seem to be able to make some connections to the films, which can sometimes heavily affect it, like the Solovia Accords (did I spell that right), but what does that mean for SHIELD in the films? It seems like time is factor, because they can't put these things in the films, because the TV series would've already moved onto something else.

Some of the reason why I hadn't replied sooner was because I didn't want to go in discussion about something I wasn't completely knowledgeable about, since I hadn't seenCivl War at that point. So regarding General Ross' new was described by him having a heart attack or a stroke something, and can be retconned. But it does leave other problems that was set up inHulk, where the Leader was a possibility. I think the some of the tie-in comics are supposed to be "canon," and I think the Leader had some interaction with Black Widow, but again it's just the comics, so is anybody supposed to take that seriously? It's kind of a shame that they set these things up, but can't follow on, and if they did they'd probably have to retcon all of that. And, finally, there's the mention of Stephen Strange inWinter Soldier. Why was SHIELD keeping an eye on Strange? Had he become Doctor Strange at that point? They put in a geeky nod to him, but have just intentionally forgotten that ever happened. (BTW, I haven't seenDoctor Strange, but I was never too sure about that to begin with). --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)12:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind weighing inhere. Thanks,LLArrow (talk)22:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anythingspossibleforapossible. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasedo not change Waldo's year of birth, which was 1920. She was 96 at the time of her death per allreputable and reliable sources (see[1],[2],[3]). You are free to open a discussion on the talk page, of course.Quis separabit?06:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quis separabit, Voice Chasers makes it their business to know about the voice actors they cover (a lot more than Behind the Voice Actors). And just like Behind the Voice Actors just because you've found some "reliable" sources that don't give the time of day to do proper research because they cover all kinds of news, you think you can use that in your argument that you are right, and that she was born in 1920. It's not something I really want to discuss; an edit has been made, unless an admin deletes that entry from ever existing, I'm satisfied that I tried to help. True, I didn't even post a link, but you can look up Voice Chasers' post when she died and they talk about it. Wikipedia can do whatever it wants regarding the date of Janet Waldo's birth. --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)11:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re:these edits and specificallythis one where you express a concern that an episode summary is a major spoiler, you should probably be aware ofWP:SPOILER. Basically, we don't warn users about spoilers, nor do we remove content simply because it is a spoiler. The purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information, not to suppress it. That said, I have no interest in reverting you. Though a claim was made that those episodes have already aired in South Korea and that would reasonably be the source of the summaries, no indication has been provided yet that the episodes did in fact air in South Korea. Regards,Cyphoidbomb (talk)15:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe expressing my frustrating in them being spoiled didn't help, but the fact that there's been pages such asBe Cool, Scooby-Doo! (and I thinkList of Ultimate Spider-Man episodes), where descriptions have been removed based on episodes airing outside of the US, led me to believe this should be done forTMNT season 4 (I also did the same forList of Avengers Assemble episodes). --Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk)22:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun atTalk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk)01:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, I rearranged the location of your recent comment on theTalk:Marvel Cinematic Universe page since it looked like you were replying to the other conversation. Feel free to move it back if I got that wrong. -DinoSlider (talk)22:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anythingspossibleforapossible. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of TaleSpin episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageThe Idle Rich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anythingspossibleforapossible. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anythingspossibleforapossible. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]