Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Timeline of quantum mechanics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See also:history of quantum mechanics andtimeline of particle physics
This articlepossibly containsoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(April 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Thetimeline of quantum mechanics is a list of key events in thehistory of quantum mechanics,quantum field theories andquantum chemistry.

19th century

[edit]
Image of Becquerel's photographic plate that has been fogged by exposure to radiation from a uranium salt. The shadow of a metalMaltese Cross placed between the plate and the uranium salt is clearly visible.
  • 1801 –Thomas Young establishes that light made up of waves with hisDouble-slit experiment.
  • 1859 –Gustav Kirchhoff introduces the concept of ablackbody and proves that its emission spectrum depends only on its temperature.[1]
  • 1860–1900 –Ludwig Eduard Boltzmann,James Clerk Maxwell and others develop the theory ofstatistical mechanics. Boltzmann argues thatentropy is a measure of disorder.[1]
  • 1877 – Boltzmann suggests that the energy levels of a physical system could be discrete based on statistical mechanics and mathematical arguments; also produces the first circle diagram representation, or atomic model of a molecule (such as an iodine gas molecule) in terms of the overlapping terms α and β, later (in 1928) called molecular orbitals, of the constituting atoms.
  • 1885 –Johann Jakob Balmer discovers a numerical relationship between visible spectral lines ofhydrogen, theBalmer series.
  • 1887 –Heinrich Hertz discovers the photoelectric effect, shown by Einstein in 1905 to involvequanta of light.
  • 1888 – Hertz demonstrates experimentally that electromagnetic waves exist, as predicted by Maxwell.[1]
  • 1888 –Johannes Rydberg modifies the Balmer formula to include all spectral series of lines for the hydrogen atom, producing the Rydberg formula that is employed later byNiels Bohr and others to verify Bohr's first quantum model of the atom.
  • 1895 –Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discovers X-rays in experiments with electron beams in plasma.[1]
  • 1896 –Antoine Henri Becquerel accidentally discoversradioactivity while investigating the work ofWilhelm Conrad Röntgen; he finds that uranium salts emit radiation that resembled Röntgen's X-rays in their penetrating power. In one experiment, Becquerel wraps a sample of a phosphorescent substance, potassium uranyl sulfate, in photographic plates surrounded by very thick black paper in preparation for an experiment with bright sunlight; then, to his surprise, the photographic plates are already exposed before the experiment starts, showing a projected image of his sample.[1][2]
  • 1896–1897 –Pieter Zeeman first observes theZeeman splitting effect by applying a magnetic field to light sources.[3]
  • 1896–1897 –Marie Curie (née Skłodowska, Becquerel's doctoral student) investigates uranium salt samples using a very sensitiveelectrometer device that was invented 15 years before by her husband and his brother Jacques Curie to measure electrical charge. She discovers that rays emitted by the uranium salt samples make the surrounding air electrically conductive, and measures the emitted rays' intensity. In April 1898, through a systematic search of substances, she finds thatthorium compounds, like those of uranium, emitted "Becquerel rays", thus preceding the work ofFrederick Soddy andErnest Rutherford on the nuclear decay of thorium toradium by three years.[4]
  • 1897:
  • 1899–1903 –Ernest Rutherford investigates radioactivity. He coins the termsalpha andbeta rays in 1899 to describe the two distinct types of radiation emitted bythorium anduranium salts. Rutherford is joined at McGill University in 1900 byFrederick Soddy and together they discovernuclear transmutation when they find in 1902 that radioactive thorium is converting itself intoradium through a process ofnuclear decay and a gas (later found to be4
    2
    He
    ); they report their interpretation of radioactivity in 1903.[8] Rutherford becomes known as the "father ofnuclear physics" with hisnuclear atom model of 1911.[9]

20th century

[edit]

1900–1909

[edit]
Einstein, in 1905, when he wrote theAnnus Mirabilis papers
  • 1900 – To explainblack-body radiation (1862),Max Planck suggests that electromagnetic energy could only be emitted in quantized form, i.e. the energy could only be a multiple of an elementary unitE =, whereh is thePlanck constant andν is the frequency of the radiation.
  • 1902 – To explain theoctet rule (1893),Gilbert N. Lewis develops the "cubical atom" theory in which electrons in the form of dots are positioned at the corner of a cube. Predicts that single, double, or triple "bonds" result when two atoms are held together by multiple pairs of electrons (one pair for each bond) located between the two atoms.
  • 1903 – Antoine Becquerel, Pierre Curie and Marie Curie share the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physics for their work onspontaneous radioactivity.
  • 1904 –Richard Abegg notes the pattern that the numerical difference between the maximum positive valence, such as +6 for H2SO4, and the maximum negative valence, such as −2 for H2S, of an element tends to be eight (Abegg's rule).
  • 1905 :
  • 1907 to 1917 – Ernest Rutherford: To test hisplanetary model of 1904, later known as theRutherford model, he sent a beam of positively chargedalpha particles onto a gold foil and noticed that some bounced back, thus showing that an atom has a small-sized positively chargedatomic nucleus at its center. However, he received in 1908 the Nobel Prize in Chemistry "for his investigations into the disintegration of the elements, and the chemistry of radioactive substances",[10] which followed on the work of Marie Curie, not for his planetary model of the atom; he is also widely credited with first "splitting the atom" in 1917. In 1911 Ernest Rutherford explained theGeiger–Marsden experiment by invoking anuclear atom model and derived theRutherford cross section.
  • 1909 –Geoffrey Ingram Taylor demonstrates that interference patterns of light were generated even when the light energy introduced consisted of only one photon. This discovery of thewave–particle duality of matter and energy is fundamental to the later development ofquantum field theory.
  • 1909 and 1916 – Einstein shows that, ifPlanck's law of black-body radiation is accepted, the energy quanta must also carrymomentump =h /λ, making them full-fledgedparticles.

1910–1919

[edit]
A schematic diagram of the apparatus for Millikan's refined oil drop experiment
  • 1911:
    • Lise Meitner andOtto Hahn perform an experiment that shows that the energies ofelectrons emitted bybeta decay had a continuous rather than discrete spectrum. This is in apparent contradiction to the law of conservation of energy, as it appeared that energy was lost in the beta decay process. A second problem is that the spin of thenitrogen-14 atom was 1, in contradiction to the Rutherford prediction of12. These anomalies are later explained by the discoveries of theneutrino and theneutron.
    • Ștefan Procopiu performs experiments in which he determines the correct value of electron's magnetic dipole moment,μB =9.27×10−21 erg·Oe−1 (in 1913 he is also able to calculate a theoretical value of theBohr magneton based on Planck's quantum theory).
    • John William Nicholson is noted as the first to create an atomic model that quantized angular momentum ash/2π.[11][12]Niels Bohr quoted him in his 1913 paper of theBohr model of the atom.[13]
  • 1912 –Victor Hess discovers the existence ofcosmic radiation.
  • 1912 –Henri Poincaré publishes an influential mathematical argument in support of the essential nature of energy quanta.[14][15]
  • 1913:
    • Robert Andrews Millikan publishes the results of his "oil drop" experiment, in which he precisely determines theelectric charge of the electron. Determination of the fundamental unit of electric charge makes it possible to calculate theAvogadro constant (which is the number of atoms or molecules in onemole of any substance) and thereby to determine theatomic weight of the atoms of eachelement.
    • Niels Bohr publishes his 1913 paper of theBohr model of the atom.[16]
    • Ștefan Procopiu publishes a theoretical paper with the correct value of the electron's magnetic dipole momentμB.[17]
    • Niels Bohr obtains theoretically the value of the electron's magnetic dipole momentμB as a consequence of his atom model
    • Johannes Stark andAntonino Lo Surdo independently discover the shifting and splitting of the spectral lines of atoms and molecules due to the presence of the light source in an external static electric field.
    • To explain theRydberg formula (1888), which correctly modeled the light emission spectra of atomic hydrogen, Bohr hypothesizes that negatively charged electrons revolve around a positively charged nucleus at certain fixed "quantum" distances and that each of these "spherical orbits" has a specific energy associated with it such that electron movements between orbits requires "quantum" emissions or absorptions of energy.
  • 1914 –James Franck andGustav Hertz report theirexperiment on electron collisions with mercury atoms, which provides a new test of Bohr's quantized model of atomic energy levels.[18]
  • 1915 – Einstein first presents to thePrussian Academy of Science what are now known as theEinstein field equations. These equations specify how the geometry of space and time is influenced by whatever matter is present, and form the core of Einstein'sGeneral Theory of Relativity. Although this theory is not directly applicable to quantum mechanics, theorists ofquantum gravity seek to reconcile them.
  • 1916 –Paul Epstein[19] andKarl Schwarzschild,[20] working independently, derive equations for the linear and quadraticStark effect in hydrogen.
  • 1916 –Gilbert N. Lewis conceives the theoretical basis ofLewis dot formulas, diagrams that show thebonding betweenatoms of amolecule and thelone pairs of electrons that may exist in the molecule.[21]
  • 1916 – To account for theZeeman effect (1896), i.e. that atomic absorption or emission spectral lines change when the light source is subjected to a magnetic field,Arnold Sommerfeld suggests there might be "elliptical orbits" in atoms in addition to spherical orbits.
  • 1918 – Sir Ernest Rutherford notices that, whenalpha particles are shot intonitrogen gas, hisscintillation detectors shows the signatures of hydrogen nuclei. Rutherford determines that the only place this hydrogen could have come from was the nitrogen, and therefore nitrogen must contain hydrogen nuclei. He thus suggests that the hydrogen nucleus, which is known to have anatomic number of 1, is anelementary particle, which he decides must be theprotons hypothesized byEugen Goldstein.
  • 1919 – Building on the work of Lewis (1916),Irving Langmuir coins the term "covalence" and postulates thatcoordinate covalent bonds occur when two electrons of a pair of atoms come from both atoms and are equally shared by them, thus explaining the fundamental nature of chemical bonding and molecular chemistry.

1920–1929

[edit]
A plaque at theUniversity of Frankfurt commemorating theStern–Gerlach experiment

1930–1939

[edit]
Electron microscope constructed by Ernst Ruska in 1933
  • 1930
    • Dirac hypothesizes the existence of the positron.[1]
    • Dirac's textbookThe Principles of Quantum Mechanics is published, becoming a standard reference book that is still used today.
    • Erich Hückel introduces theHückel molecular orbital method, which expands on orbital theory to determine the energies of orbitals ofpi electrons in conjugated hydrocarbon systems.
    • Fritz London explainsvan der Waals forces as due to the interacting fluctuatingdipole moments between molecules
    • Pauli suggests in a famous letter that, in addition to electrons and protons, atoms also contain an extremely light neutral particle that he calls the "neutron". He suggests that this "neutron" is also emitted during beta decay and has simply not yet been observed. Later it is determined that this particle is actually the almost massless neutrino.[1]
  • 1931:
  • 1932:
    • Irène Joliot-Curie andFrédéric Joliot show that if the unknown radiation generated by alpha particles falls on paraffin or any other hydrogen-containing compound, it ejectsprotons of very high energy. This is not in itself inconsistent with the proposedgamma ray nature of the new radiation, but detailed quantitative analysis of the data become increasingly difficult to reconcile with such a hypothesis.
    • James Chadwick performs a series of experiments showing that the gamma ray hypothesis for the unknown radiation produced by alpha particles is untenable, and that the new particles must be theneutrons hypothesized by Fermi.[1]
    • Werner Heisenberg appliesperturbation theory to the two-electron problem to show howresonance arising from electron exchange can explainForce carriers.
    • Mark Oliphant: Building upon the nuclear transmutation experiments of Ernest Rutherford done a few years earlier, observes fusion of light nuclei (hydrogen isotopes). The steps of the main cycle of nuclear fusion in stars are subsequently worked out by Hans Bethe over the next decade.
    • Carl D. Anderson experimentally proves the existence of the positron.[1]
  • 1933 – Following Chadwick's experiments, Fermi renames Pauli's "neutron" to neutrino to distinguish it from Chadwick's theory of the much more massive neutron.
  • 1933 –Leó Szilárd first theorizes the concept of a nuclear chain reaction. He files a patent for his idea of a simple nuclear reactor the following year.
  • 1934:
    • Fermi publishes a very successfulmodel of beta decay in which neutrinos are produced.
    • Fermi studies the effects of bombardinguranium isotopes with neutrons.
    • N. N. Semyonov develops the total quantitative chain chemical reaction theory, later the basis of various high technologies using the incineration of gas mixtures. The idea is also used for the description of the nuclear reaction.
    • Irène Joliot-Curie and Frédéric Joliot-Curie discoverartificial radioactivity and are jointly awarded the 1935 Nobel Prize in Chemistry[29]
  • 1935:
    • Einstein,Boris Podolsky, andNathan Rosen describe theEPR paradox, which challenges the completeness of quantum mechanics as it was theorized up to that time. Assuming thatlocal realism is valid, they demonstrated that there would need to behidden parameters to explain how measuring the quantum state of one particle could influence the quantum state of another particle without apparent contact between them.[30]
    • Schrödinger develops theSchrödinger's cat thought experiment. It illustrates what he saw as the problems of theCopenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics if subatomic particles can be in two contradictory quantum states at once.
    • Hideki Yukawa predicts the existence of thepion, stating that such a potential arises from the exchange of a massivescalar field, as it would be found in the field of the pion. Prior to Yukawa's paper, it was believed that the scalar fields of thefundamental forces necessitated massless particles.
  • 1936 –Alexandru Proca publishes prior toHideki Yukawa his relativistic quantum field equations for a massivevector meson ofspin-1 as a basis fornuclear forces.
  • 1936 –Garrett Birkhoff andJohn von Neumann introduceQuantum Logic[31] in an attempt to reconcile the apparent inconsistency of classical, Boolean logic with the HeisenbergUncertainty Principle of quantum mechanics as applied, for example, to the measurement of complementary (noncommuting)observables in quantum mechanics, such asposition and momentum;[32] current approaches to quantum logic involvenoncommutative andnon-associativemany-valued logic.[33][34]
  • 1936 –Carl D. Anderson discoversmuons while he is studying cosmic radiation.
  • 1937 –Hermann Arthur Jahn andEdward Teller prove, usinggroup theory, that non-linear degenerate molecules are unstable.[35] The Jahn–Teller theorem essentially states that any non-linear molecule with adegenerate electronic ground state will undergo a geometrical distortion that removes that degeneracy, because the distortion lowers the overall energy of the complex. The latter process is called theJahn–Teller effect; this effect was recently considered also in relation to the superconductivity mechanism inYBCO and otherhigh temperature superconductors. The details of the Jahn–Teller effect are presented with several examples and EPR data in the basic textbook by Abragam and Bleaney (1970).
  • 1938 –Charles Coulson makes the first accurate calculation of a molecular orbitalwavefunction with thehydrogen molecule.
  • 1938 –Otto Hahn and his assistantFritz Strassmann send a manuscript to Naturwissenschaften reporting they have detected the element barium after bombarding uranium with neutrons. Hahn calls this new phenomenon a 'bursting' of the uranium nucleus. Simultaneously, Hahn communicates these results toLise Meitner. Meitner, and her nephewOtto Robert Frisch, correctly interpret these results as being anuclear fission. Frisch confirms this experimentally on 13 January 1939.
  • 1939 –Leó Szilárd and Fermi discover neutron multiplication in uranium, proving that a chain reaction is indeed possible.

1940–1949

[edit]
AFeynman diagram showing the radiation of a gluon when an electron and positron are annihilated

1950–1959

[edit]

1960–1969

[edit]
The baryon decuplet of theEightfold Way proposed by Murray Gell-Mann in 1962. TheΩ
particle at the bottom had not yet been observed at the time, but a particle closely matching these predictions was discovered[48] by aparticle accelerator group atBrookhaven, proving Gell-Mann's theory.
  • 1961 –Claus Jönsson performsYoung'sdouble-slit experiment (1909) for the first time with particles other than photons by using electrons and with similar results, confirming that massive particles also behaved according to the wave–particle duality that is a fundamental principle of quantum field theory.
  • 1961 –Anatole Abragam publishes the fundamental textbook on the quantum theory ofNuclear Magnetic Resonance entitledThe Principles of Nuclear Magnetism;[49]
  • 1961 –Sheldon Glashow extends theelectroweak interaction models developed by Julian Schwinger by including a short rangeneutral current, the Zo. The resulting symmetry structure that Glashow proposes, SU(2) × U(1), forms the basis of the accepted theory of the electroweak interactions.
  • 1962 –Leon M. Lederman,Melvin Schwartz andJack Steinberger show that more than one type of neutrino exists by detecting interactions of themuon neutrino (already hypothesised with the name "neutretto")
  • 1962 –Jeffrey Goldstone,Yoichiro Nambu,Abdus Salam, andSteven Weinberg develop what is now known asGoldstone's Theorem: if there is a continuous symmetry transformation under which the Lagrangian is invariant, then either the vacuum state is also invariant under the transformation, or there must be spinless particles of zero mass, thereafter calledNambu–Goldstone bosons.
  • 1962 to 1973 –Brian David Josephson, predicts correctly the quantum tunneling effect involving superconducting currents while he is a PhD student under the supervision of Professor Brian Pippard at the Royal Society Mond Laboratory in Cambridge, UK; subsequently, in 1964, he applies his theory to coupled superconductors. The effect is later demonstrated experimentally at Bell Labs in the USA. For his important quantum discovery he is awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973.[50]
  • 1963 –Eugene P. Wigner lays the foundation for the theory of symmetries in quantum mechanics as well as for basic research into the structure of the atomic nucleus; makes important "contributions to the theory of the atomic nucleus and the elementary particles, particularly through the discovery and application of fundamental symmetry principles"; he shares half of his Nobel prize in Physics withMaria Goeppert-Mayer andJ. Hans D. Jensen.
  • 1963 –Maria Goeppert Mayer andJ. Hans D. Jensen share withEugene P. Wigner half of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1963 "for their discoveries concerningnuclear shell structure theory".[51]
  • 1964 –John Stewart Bell puts forthBell's theorem, which used testableinequality relations to show the flaws in the earlierEinstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox and prove that no physical theory oflocal hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics. This inaugurated the study ofquantum entanglement, the phenomenon in which separate particles share the same quantum state despite being at a distance from each other.
  • 1964 –Nikolai G. Basov andAleksandr M. Prokhorov share the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1964 for, respectively,semiconductor lasers andQuantum Electronics; they also share the prize withCharles Hard Townes, the inventor of the ammoniummaser.
  • 1969 to 1977 – SirNevill Mott andPhilip Warren Anderson publish quantum theories for electrons in non-crystalline solids, such as glasses and amorphous semiconductors; receive in 1977 a Nobel prize in Physics for their investigations into the electronic structure of magnetic and disordered systems, which allow for the development of electronic switching and memory devices in computers. The prize is shared withJohn Hasbrouck Van Vleck for his contributions to the understanding of the behavior of electrons in magnetic solids; he established the fundamentals of the quantum mechanical theory of magnetism and the crystal field theory (chemical bonding in metal complexes) and is regarded as the Father of modern Magnetism.
  • 1969 and 1970 –Theodor V. Ionescu, Radu Pârvan and I.C. Baianu observe and report quantum amplified stimulation of electromagnetic radiation in hot deuterium plasmas in a longitudinal magnetic field; publish a quantum theory of the amplified coherent emission of radiowaves and microwaves by focused electron beams coupled to ions in hot plasmas.

1971–1979

[edit]
  • 1971 –Martinus J. G. Veltman andGerardus 't Hooft show that, if the symmetries ofYang–Mills theory are broken according to the method suggested byPeter Higgs, then Yang–Mills theory can be renormalized. The renormalization of Yang–Mills Theory predicts the existence of a massless particle, called thegluon, which could explain the nuclearstrong force. It also explains how the particles of theweak interaction, theW and Z bosons, obtain their mass viaspontaneous symmetry breaking and theYukawa interaction.
  • 1972 –Francis Perrin discovers "natural nuclear fission reactors" in uranium deposits inOklo,Gabon, where analysis of isotope ratios demonstrate that self-sustaining, nuclear chain reactions have occurred. The conditions under which a natural nuclear reactor could exist were predicted in 1956 by P. Kuroda.
  • 1973 –Peter Mansfield formulates the physical theory ofnuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI) akamagnetic resonance imaging (MRI).[52][53][54][55]
  • 1974 – Pier Giorgio Merli performs Young's double-slit experiment (1909) using a single electron with similar results, confirming the existence ofquantum fields for massive particles.
  • 1977 –Ilya Prigogine develops non-equilibrium,irreversible thermodynamics andquantum operator theory, especially the timesuperoperator theory; he is awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1977 "for his contributions to non-equilibrium thermodynamics, particularly the theory of dissipative structures".[56]
  • 1978 –Pyotr Kapitsa observes new phenomena in hot deuterium plasmas excited by very high power microwaves in attempts to obtain controlled thermonuclear fusion reactions in such plasmas placed in longitudinal magnetic fields, using a novel and low-cost design of thermonuclear reactor, similar in concept to that reported by Theodor V. Ionescuet al. in 1969. Receives a Nobel prize for early low temperature physics experiments on helium superfluidity carried out in 1937 at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, UK, and discusses his 1977 thermonuclear reactor results in his Nobel lecture on December 8, 1978.
  • 1979 – Kenneth A. Rubinson and coworkers, at theCavendish Laboratory, observe ferromagneticspin wave resonant excitations in metallic glasses and interpret the observations in terms of two-magnon dispersion and aspin exchangeHamiltonian, similar in form to that of aHeisenberg ferromagnet.[57]

1980–1999

[edit]
  • 1980 to 1982 –Alain Aspect verifies experimentally thequantum entanglement hypothesis; hisBell test experiments provide strong evidence that a quantum event at one location can affect an event at another location without any obvious mechanism for communication between the two locations.[58][59] This remarkable result confirmed the experimental verification of quantum entanglement byJohn F. Clauser. and.Stuart Freedman in 1972.[60] Aspect later shared the 2022Nobel Prize in Physics with Clauser andAnton Zeilinger "for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science".[61]
  • 1982 to 1997 –Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) atPPPL, Princeton, USA: Operated since 1982, produces 10.7 MW of controlled fusion power for only 0.21 s in 1994 by using T–D nuclear fusion in a tokamak reactor with "a toroidal 6T magnetic field for plasma confinement, a 3 MA plasma current and an electron density of1.0×1020 m−3 of 13.5 keV"[62]
  • 1983 –Carlo Rubbia andSimon van der Meer, at theSuper Proton Synchrotron, see unambiguous signals ofW particles in January. The actual experiments are calledUA1 (led by Rubbia) andUA2 (led by Peter Jenni), and are the collaborative effort of many people.Simon van der Meer is the driving force on the use of the accelerator. UA1 and UA2 find theZ particle a few months later, in May 1983.
  • 1983 to 2011 – The largest and most powerful experimental nuclear fusion tokamak reactor in the world,Joint European Torus (JET) begins operation at Culham Facility in UK; operates with T-D plasma pulses and has a reported gain factorQ of 0.7 in 2009, with an input of 40MW for plasma heating, and a 2800-ton iron magnet for confinement;[63] in 1997 in a tritium-deuterium experiment JET produces 16 MW of fusion power, a total of 22 MJ of fusion, energy and a steady fusion power of 4 MW, which is maintained for 4 seconds.[64]
  • 1985 to 2010 – TheJT-60 (Japan Torus) begins operation in 1985 with an experimental D–D nuclear fusion tokamak similar to the JET; in 2010 JT-60 holds the record for the highest value of thefusion triple product achieved:1.77×1028 K·s·m−3 =1.53×1021 keV·s·m−3.[65] JT-60 claims it would have an equivalent energy gain factor,Q of 1.25 if it were operated with a T–D plasma instead of the D–D plasma, and on May 9, 2006, attains a fusion hold time of 28.6 s in full operation; moreover, a high-power microwavegyrotron construction is completed that is capable of 1.5 MW output for 1 s,[66] thus meeting the conditions for the plannedITER, large-scale nuclear fusion reactor. JT-60 is disassembled in 2010 to be upgraded to a more powerful nuclear fusion reactor—the JT-60SA—by using niobium–titanium superconducting coils for the magnet confining the ultra-hot D–D plasma.
  • 1986 –Johannes Georg Bednorz andKarl Alexander Müller produce unambiguous experimental proof ofhigh temperature superconductivity involvingJahn–Tellerpolarons in orthorhombic La2CuO4,YBCO and other perovskite-type oxides; promptly receive a Nobel prize in 1987 and deliver their Nobel lecture on December 8, 1987.[67]
  • 1986 –Vladimir Gershonovich Drinfeld introduces the concept ofquantum groups asHopf algebras in his seminal address on quantum theory at theInternational Congress of Mathematicians, and also connects them to the study of theYang–Baxter equation, which is a necessary condition for the solvability ofstatistical mechanics models; he also generalizes Hopf algebras toquasi-Hopf algebras, and introduces the study of Drinfeld twists, which can be used to factorize theR-matrix corresponding to the solution of theYang–Baxter equation associated with aquasitriangular Hopf algebra.
  • 1988 to 1998 –Mihai Gavrilă discovers in 1988 the new quantum phenomenon ofatomic dichotomy in hydrogen and subsequently publishes a book on the atomic structure and decay in high-frequency fields of hydrogen atoms placed in ultra-intense laser fields.[68][69][70][71][72][73][74]
  • 1991 –Richard R. Ernst develops two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (2D-FT NMRS) for small molecules in solution and is awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1991 "for his contributions to the development of the methodology of high resolution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy".[75]
  • 1995 –Eric Cornell,Carl Wieman andWolfgang Ketterle and co-workers atJILA create the first "pure" Bose–Einstein condensate. They do this by cooling a dilute vapor consisting of approximately two thousand rubidium-87 atoms to below 170 nK using a combination of laser cooling and magnetic evaporative cooling. About four months later, an independent effort led by Wolfgang Ketterle atMIT creates a condensate made of sodium-23. Ketterle's condensate has about a hundred times more atoms, allowing him to obtain several important results such as the observation of quantum mechanical interference between two different condensates.
  • 1997 –Peter Shor publishesShor's algorithm, a quantum computing algorithm for findingprime factors of integers.[76] The algorithm is one of the few known quantum algorithms with immediate potential applications, which likely leads to asuperpolynomial improvement over known non-quantum algorithms.[77]
  • 1999 to 2013 – NSTX—TheNational Spherical Torus Experiment at PPPL, Princeton, USA launches a nuclear fusion project on February 12, 1999, for "an innovative magnetic fusion device that was constructed by the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) in collaboration with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Columbia University, and the University of Washington at Seattle"; NSTX is being used to study the physics principles of spherically shaped plasmas.[78]

21st century

[edit]
Graphene is a planaratomic-scale honeycomb lattice made of carbon atoms, which exhibits unusual and interesting quantum properties.
This section needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(April 2024)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrPeacock 2008, pp. 175–183
  2. ^Becquerel, Henri (1896). "Sur les radiations émises par phosphorescence".Comptes Rendus.122:420–421.
  3. ^"Milestone 1 : Nature Milestones in Spin".www.nature.com. Retrieved2018-09-09.
  4. ^Marie Curie and the Science of Radioactivity: Research Breakthroughs (1897–1904)Archived 2015-11-17 at theWayback Machine. Aip.org. Retrieved on 2012-05-17.
  5. ^Histories of the Electron: The Birth of Microphysicsedited by Jed Z. Buchwald, Andrew Warwick
  6. ^Larmor, Joseph (1897),"On a Dynamical Theory of the Electric and Luminiferous Medium, Part 3, Relations with material media" ,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,190:205–300,Bibcode:1897RSPTA.190..205L,doi:10.1098/rsta.1897.0020
  7. ^Larmor, Joseph (1897),"On a Dynamical Theory of the Electric and Luminiferous Medium, Part 3, Relations with material media" ,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,190:205–300,Bibcode:1897RSPTA.190..205L,doi:10.1098/rsta.1897.0020 Quotes from one of Larmor's voluminous work include: "while atoms of matter are in whole or in part aggregations of electrons in stable orbital motion. In particular, this scheme provides a consistent foundation for the electrodynamic laws, and agrees with the actual relations between radiation and moving matter."
    • "A formula for optical dispersion was obtained in § 11 of the second part of this memoir, on the simple hypothesis that the electric polarization of the molecules vibrated as a whole in unison with the electric field of the radiation."
    • "... that of the transmission of radiation across a medium permeated by molecules, each consisting of a system of electrons in steady orbital motion, and each capable of free oscillations about the steady state of motion with definite free periods analogous to those of the planetary inequalities of the Solar System"
    • "'A' will be a positive electron in the medium, and 'B' will be the complementary negative one…We shall thus have created two permanent conjugate electrons 'A' and 'B'; each of them can be moved about through the medium, but they will both persist until they are destroyed by an extraneous process the reverse of that by which they are formed."
  8. ^Soddy, Frederick (December 12, 1922)."The origins of the conceptions of isotopes"(PDF).Nobel Lecture in Chemistry. Retrieved25 April 2012.
  9. ^Ernest Rutherford, Baron Rutherford of Nelson, of Cambridge. Encyclopædia Britannica on-line. Retrieved on 2012-05-17.
  10. ^The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1908: Ernest Rutherford. nobelprize.org
  11. ^J. W. Nicholson, Month. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. lxxii. pp. 49,130, 677, 693, 729 (1912).
  12. ^The Atomic Theory of John William Nicholson, Russell McCormmach, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 2 (25.8.1966), pp. 160–184 (25 pages), Springer.
  13. ^On the Constitution of Atoms and MoleculesNiels Bohr, Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, Volume 26 July 1913, pp. 1–25
  14. ^McCormmach, Russell (Spring 1967). "Henri Poincaré and the Quantum Theory".Isis.58 (1):37–55.doi:10.1086/350182.S2CID 120934561.
  15. ^Irons, F. E. (August 2001). "Poincaré's 1911–12 proof of quantum discontinuity interpreted as applying to atoms".American Journal of Physics.69 (8):879–884.Bibcode:2001AmJPh..69..879I.doi:10.1119/1.1356056.
  16. ^On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules, Niels Bohr, Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, Volume 26 July 1913, pp. 1–25
  17. ^Procopiu, Ştefan (1913). "Determining the Molecular Magnetic Moment by M. Planck's Quantum Theory".Bulletin Scientifique de l'Académie Roumaine de Sciences.1: 151.
  18. ^Pais, Abraham (1995). "Introducing Atoms and Their Nuclei". In Brown, Laurie M.; Pais, Abraham; Pippard, Brian (eds.).Twentieth Century Physics. Vol. 1. American Institute of Physics Press. p. 89.ISBN 9780750303101.Now the beauty of Franck and Hertz's work lies not only in the measurement of the energy lossE2-E1 of the impinging electron, but they also observed that, when the energy of that electron exceeds 4.9 eV, mercury begins to emit ultraviolet light of a definite frequencyν as defined in the above formula. Thereby they gave (unwittingly at first) the first direct experimental proof of the Bohr relation!
  19. ^P. S. Epstein,Zur Theorie des Starkeffektes, Annalen der Physik, vol.50, pp. 489–520 (1916)
  20. ^K. Schwarzschild, Sitzungsberichten der Kgl. Preuss. Akad. d. Wiss. April 1916, p. 548
  21. ^Lewis, G. N. (1916),"The Atom and the Molecule",J. Am. Chem. Soc.,38 (4):762–85,doi:10.1021/ja02261a002,S2CID 95865413
  22. ^H. A. Kramers, Roy. Danish Academy,Intensities of Spectral Lines. On the Application of the Quantum Theory to the Problem of Relative Intensities of the Components of the Fine Structure and of the Stark Effect of the Lines of the Hydrogen Spectrum, p. 287 (1919);Über den Einfluß eines elektrischen Feldes auf die Feinstruktur der Wasserstofflinien (On the influence of an electric field on the fine structure of hydrogen lines), Zeitschrift für Physik, vol.3, pp. 199–223 (1920)
  23. ^Lewis, G.N. (1926)."The conservation of photons".Nature.118 (2981):874–875.Bibcode:1926Natur.118..874L.doi:10.1038/118874a0.S2CID 4110026.
  24. ^P. S. Epstein, "The Stark Effect from the Point of View of Schroedinger's Quantum Theory",Physical Review, vol28, pp. 695–710 (1926)
  25. ^John von Neumann. 1932.The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey, reprinted in 1955, 1971 and 1983 editions
  26. ^Van Hove, Léon (1958)."Von Neumann's Contributions to Quantum Theory".Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.64 (3):95–100.doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1958-10206-2.
  27. ^Peter, F.; Weyl, H. (1927). "Die Vollständigkeit der primitiven Darstellungen einer geschlossenen kontinuierlichen Gruppe".Math. Ann.97:737–755.doi:10.1007/BF01447892.S2CID 120013521.
  28. ^Brauer, Richard;Weyl, Hermann (1935). "Spinors in n dimensions".American Journal of Mathematics.57 (2):425–449.doi:10.2307/2371218.JSTOR 2371218.
  29. ^Frédéric Joliot-Curie (December 12, 1935)."Chemical evidence of the transmutation of elements"(PDF).Nobel Lecture. Retrieved25 April 2012.
  30. ^Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N; Podolsky; Rosen (1935)."Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?".Phys. Rev.47 (10):777–780.Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. ^Birkhoff, Garrett & von Neumann, J. (1936). "The Logic of Quantum Mechanics".Annals of Mathematics.37 (4):823–843.doi:10.2307/1968621.JSTOR 1968621.
  32. ^Omnès, Roland (8 March 1999).Understanding Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press.ISBN 978-0-691-00435-8. Retrieved17 May 2012.
  33. ^Dalla Chiara, M. L.; Giuntini, R. (1994). "Unsharp quantum logics".Foundations of Physics.24 (8):1161–1177.Bibcode:1994FoPh...24.1161D.doi:10.1007/BF02057862.S2CID 122872424.
  34. ^Georgescu, G. (2006). "N-valued Logics and Łukasiewicz-Moisil Algebras".Axiomathes.16 (1–2):123–136.doi:10.1007/s10516-005-4145-6.S2CID 121264473.
  35. ^H. Jahn andE. Teller (1937)."Stability of Polyatomic Molecules in Degenerate Electronic States. I. Orbital Degeneracy".Proceedings of the Royal Society A.161 (905):220–235.Bibcode:1937RSPSA.161..220J.doi:10.1098/rspa.1937.0142.
  36. ^Dyson, F. (1949). "The S Matrix in Quantum Electrodynamics".Phys. Rev.75 (11):1736–1755.Bibcode:1949PhRv...75.1736D.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.1736.
  37. ^Stix, Gary (October 1999)."Infamy and honor at the Atomic Café: Edward Teller has no regrets about his contentious career".Scientific American:42–43. Archived fromthe original on 2012-10-18. Retrieved25 April 2012.
  38. ^Hans A. Bethe (May 28, 1952).Memorandum on the History of Thermonuclear Program (Report). Reconstructed version from only partially declassified documents, with certain words deliberately deleted.
  39. ^Bloch, F.; Hansen, W.; Packard, Martin (1946)."Nuclear Induction".Physical Review.69 (3–4): 127.Bibcode:1946PhRv...69..127B.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.69.127.
  40. ^Bloch, F.; Jeffries, C. (1950). "A Direct Determination of the Magnetic Moment of the Proton in Nuclear Magnetons".Physical Review.80 (2):305–306.Bibcode:1950PhRv...80..305B.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.80.305.
  41. ^Bloch, F. (1946)."Nuclear Induction".Physical Review.70 (7–8):460–474.Bibcode:1946PhRv...70..460B.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.460.
  42. ^Gutowsky, H. S.; Kistiakowsky, G. B.; Pake, G. E.; Purcell, E. M. (1949). "Structural Investigations by Means of Nuclear Magnetism. I. Rigid Crystal Lattices".The Journal of Chemical Physics.17 (10): 972.Bibcode:1949JChPh..17..972G.doi:10.1063/1.1747097.
  43. ^Gardner, J.; Purcell, E. (1949). "A Precise Determination of the Proton Magnetic Moment in Bohr Magnetons".Physical Review.76 (8):1262–1263.Bibcode:1949PhRv...76.1262G.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.76.1262.2.
  44. ^Carver, T. R.; Slichter, C. P. (1953). "Polarization of Nuclear Spins in Metals".Physical Review.92 (1):212–213.Bibcode:1953PhRv...92..212C.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.92.212.2.
  45. ^Hugh EverettTheory of the Universal Wavefunction, Thesis, Princeton University, (1956, 1973), pp 1–140
  46. ^Everett, Hugh (1957)."Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics".Reviews of Modern Physics.29 (3):454–462.Bibcode:1957RvMP...29..454E.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454. Archived fromthe original on 2011-10-27.
  47. ^Jacek W. Hennel; Jacek Klinowski (2005). "Magic Angle Spinning: A Historical Perspective". In Jacek Klinowski (ed.).New techniques in solid-state NMR. Topics in Current Chemistry. Vol. 246. Springer. pp. 1–14.doi:10.1007/b98646.ISBN 978-3-540-22168-5.PMID 22160286.(New techniques in solid-state NMR, p. 1, atGoogle Books)
  48. ^Barnes, V.E.; Connolly, P.; Crennell, D.; Culwick, B.; Delaney, W.; Fowler, W.; Hagerty, P.; Hart, E.; Horwitz, N.; Hough, P.; Jensen, J.; Kopp, J.; Lai, K.; Leitner, J.; Lloyd, J.; London, G.; Morris, T.; Oren, Y.; Palmer, R.; Prodell, A.; Radojičić, D.; Rahm, D.; Richardson, C.; Samios, N.; Sanford, J.; Shutt, R.; Smith, J.; Stonehill, D.; Strand, R.; et al. (1964)."Observation of a Hyperon with Strangeness Number Three"(PDF).Physical Review Letters.12 (8):204–206.Bibcode:1964PhRvL..12..204B.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.204.OSTI 12491965.
  49. ^Abragam, Anatole (1961).The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.OCLC 242700.
  50. ^Brian David Josephson (December 12, 1973)."The Discovery of Tunnelling Supercurrents"(PDF).Nobel Lecture. Retrieved25 April 2012.
  51. ^Maria Goeppert Mayer (December 12, 1963)."The shell model"(PDF).Nobel Lecture. Retrieved25 April 2012.
  52. ^Mansfield, P; Grannell, P K (1973). "NMR 'diffraction' in solids?".Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics.6 (22): L422.Bibcode:1973JPhC....6L.422M.doi:10.1088/0022-3719/6/22/007.S2CID 4992859.
  53. ^Garroway, A N; Grannell, P K; Mansfield, P (1974). "Image formation in NMR by a selective irradiative process".Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics.7 (24): L457.Bibcode:1974JPhC....7L.457G.doi:10.1088/0022-3719/7/24/006.S2CID 4981940.
  54. ^Mansfield, P.; Maudsley, A. A. (1977). "Medical imaging by NMR".British Journal of Radiology.50 (591):188–94.doi:10.1259/0007-1285-50-591-188.PMID 849520.S2CID 26374556.
  55. ^Mansfield, P (1977). "Multi-planar image formationusing NMR spin echoes".Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics.10 (3):L55 –L58.Bibcode:1977JPhC...10L..55M.doi:10.1088/0022-3719/10/3/004.S2CID 121696469.
  56. ^Prigogine, Ilya (8 December 1977)."Time, Structure and Fluctuations"(PDF).Science.201 (4358):777–85.doi:10.1126/science.201.4358.777.PMID 17738519.S2CID 9129799. Retrieved25 April 2012.
  57. ^Rubinson, K.A.; Rubinson, Kenneth A.; Patterson, John (1979). "Ferromagnetic resonance and spin wave excitations in metallic glasses".J. Phys. Chem. Solids.40 (12):941–950.Bibcode:1979JPCS...40..941B.doi:10.1016/0022-3697(79)90122-7.
  58. ^Aspect, Alain; Grangier, Philippe; Roger, Gérard (1982)."Experimental Realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities".Physical Review Letters.49 (2):91–94.Bibcode:1982PhRvL..49...91A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91.
  59. ^Aspect, Alain; Dalibard, Jean; Roger, Gérard (1982)."Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers"(PDF).Physical Review Letters.49 (25):1804–1807.Bibcode:1982PhRvL..49.1804A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804.
  60. ^"Physical Review Letters – Volume 28 Issue 14".
  61. ^"The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022".NobelPrize.org. Retrieved2024-04-20.
  62. ^TFTR Machine Parameters. W3.pppl.gov (1996-05-10). Retrieved on 2012-05-17.
  63. ^JET's Main Features-EFDA JETArchived 2011-11-20 at theWayback Machine. Jet.efda.org. Retrieved on 2012-05-17.
  64. ^European JET websiteArchived 2012-03-20 at theWayback Machine. (PDF) . Retrieved on 2012-05-17.
  65. ^Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Naka Fusion InstituteArchived 2015-12-08 at theWayback Machine
  66. ^Fusion Plasma Research (FPR), JASEA, Naka Fusion InstituteArchived 2015-12-08 at theWayback Machine. Jt60.naka.jaea.go.jp. Retrieved on 2012-05-17.
  67. ^Müller, KA; Bednorz, JG (1987). "The discovery of a class of high-temperature superconductors".Science.237 (4819):1133–9.Bibcode:1987Sci...237.1133M.doi:10.1126/science.237.4819.1133.PMID 17801637.S2CID 34578587.
  68. ^Pont, M.; Walet, N.R.; Gavrila, M.; McCurdy, C.W. (1988). "Dichotomy of the Hydrogen Atom in Superintense, High-Frequency Laser Fields".Physical Review Letters.61 (8):939–942.Bibcode:1988PhRvL..61..939P.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.939.PMID 10039473.
  69. ^Pont, M.; Walet, N.; Gavrila, M. (1990). "Radiative distortion of the hydrogen atom in superintense, high-frequency fields of linear polarization".Physical Review A.41 (1):477–494.Bibcode:1990PhRvA..41..477P.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.41.477.PMID 9902891.
  70. ^Mihai Gavrila:Atomic Structure and Decay in High-Frequency Fields, inAtoms in Intense Laser Fields, ed. M. Gavrila, Academic Press, San Diego, 1992, pp. 435–510.ISBN 0-12-003901-X
  71. ^Muller, H.; Gavrila, M. (1993). "Light-Induced Excited States in H".Physical Review Letters.71 (11):1693–1696.Bibcode:1993PhRvL..71.1693M.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1693.PMID 10054474.
  72. ^Wells, J.C.; Simbotin, I.; Gavrila, M. (1998). "Physical Reality of Light-Induced Atomic States".Physical Review Letters.80 (16):3479–3482.Bibcode:1998PhRvL..80.3479W.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3479.
  73. ^Ernst, E; van Duijn, M. Gavrila; Muller, H.G. (1996). "Multiply Charged Negative Ions of Hydrogen Induced by Superintense Laser Fields".Physical Review Letters.77 (18):3759–3762.Bibcode:1996PhRvL..77.3759V.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3759.PMID 10062301.
  74. ^Shertzer, J.; Chandler, A.; Gavrila, M. (1994). "H2+ in Superintense Laser Fields: Alignment and Spectral Restructuring".Physical Review Letters.73 (15):2039–2042.Bibcode:1994PhRvL..73.2039S.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2039.PMID 10056956.
  75. ^Richard R. Ernst (December 9, 1992)."Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Fourier Transform (2D-FT) Spectroscopy"(PDF).Nobel Lecture. Retrieved25 April 2012.
  76. ^Shor, P.W. (1994)."Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring".Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Comput. Soc. Press. pp. 124–134.doi:10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700.ISBN 978-0-8186-6580-6.
  77. ^Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac L. (2010-12-09).Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511976667.ISBN 978-1-107-00217-3. Retrieved2024-04-20.{{cite book}}:|website= ignored (help)
  78. ^PPPL, Princeton, USAArchived 2011-06-07 at theWayback Machine. Pppl.gov (1999-02-12). Retrieved on 2012-05-17.
  79. ^Vandersypen, Lieven M. K.; Steffen, Matthias; Breyta, Gregory; Yannoni, Costantino S.; Sherwood, Mark H.; Chuang, Isaac L. (December 2001)."Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance".Nature.414 (6866):883–887.arXiv:quant-ph/0112176.Bibcode:2001Natur.414..883V.doi:10.1038/414883a.ISSN 1476-4687.PMID 11780055.
  80. ^Vainerman, Leonid (2003).Locally Compact Quantum Groups and Groupoids: Proceedings of the Meeting of Theoretical Physicists and Mathematicians, Strasbourg, February 21–23, 2002. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 247–.ISBN 978-3-11-020005-8. Retrieved17 May 2012.
  81. ^Cho, Adrian (2010-12-17)."Breakthrough of the Year: The First Quantum Machine".Science.330 (6011): 1604.Bibcode:2010Sci...330.1604C.doi:10.1126/science.330.6011.1604.PMID 21163978.
  82. ^"Coherent Population". Defense Procurement News. 2010-06-22. Retrieved2013-01-30.
  83. ^"The Higgs boson | CERN".home.cern. Retrieved2020-08-26.
  84. ^Johanna L. Miller (2016). "Three groups close the loopholes in tests of Bell's theorem".Physics Today.69 (1):14–16.doi:10.1063/PT.3.3039.
  85. ^"Nobel Prize in Physics 2022".nobel.org. Retrieved2025-03-07.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Peacock, Kent A. (2008).The Quantum Revolution: A Historical Perspective. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.ISBN 9780313334481.
  • Ben-Menahem, A. (2009). "Historical timeline of quantum mechanics 1925–1989".Historical Encyclopedia of Natural and Mathematical Sciences (1st ed.). Berlin: Springer. pp. 4342–4349.ISBN 9783540688310.

External links

[edit]
Background
Fundamentals
Formulations
Equations
Interpretations
Experiments
Science
Technology
Extensions
Related
Classical physics
Modern physics
Recent developments
On specific discoveries
By periods
By groups
Scientific disputes
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_of_quantum_mechanics&oldid=1285953287"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp