Several DNA polymerases have been described with distinct properties that define their specific utilisation in a PCR, inreal-time PCR or in anisothermal amplification. Being DNA polymerases, the thermostable DNA polymerases all have a 5'→3' polymerase activity, and either a 5'→3' or a 3'→5' exonuclease activity.
Thermostable DNA polymerases of natural origin are found in thermophilicbacteria,archaea and their pathogens. Among the bacterial thermostable DNA polymerases,Taq polymerase, Tfl polymerase, Tma polymerase, Tne polymerase, Tth and Bst polymerase are used.[4][15][16][2]
In addition to 5'→3' polymerase activity, the bacterial thermostable DNA polymerases (belonging to the A-type DNA polymerases) have 5'→3' exonuclease activity and generate anadenosine overhang (sticky ends) at the 3' end of the newly generated strand. TheKlenow fragment of Bst (BF) has a strand displacement activity which allows for use in isothermal amplification without the necessity ofdenaturation of the DNA in athermocycler, and its 5'→3' exonuclease activity is deleted for higher yield.[2]
Pfu polymerase with two magnesium ions (grey spheres)
Frequently used B-type DNA polymerases are thePfu polymerase,[4] the Pwo polymerase,[17] the KOD polymerase,[3] the Tli polymerase (also called Vent), which originates from various archaea,[18] the Tag polymerase,[19] the Tce polymerase,[20] the Tgo polymerase,[8] the TNA1 polymerase,[21] the Tpe polymerase,[22] the Tthi polymerase,[23] the Neq polymerase[24] and the Pab polymerase.[25]
The archaeal variants (belonging to the B-type) produceblunt ends (the Tli polymerase produces an overhang in about 30% of the products) and instead of the 5'→3' exonuclease activity have an activity for correcting synthesis errors (proof-reading), the 3'→5' exonuclease activity.[26][27] In archaeal polymerases, the error rate suffers when a Klenow fragment analogue is generated, as the correcting exonuclease activity is removed in the process.[4] Some archaeal DNA polymerases are characterised less by their suitability for standard PCR than by their reduced inhibition in the amplification ofA-DNA[28] or DNA with modified bases.[29][30]
Variousfusion proteins with the low error rate of archaeal and the high synthesis rate of bacterial thermostable DNA polymerases (Q5 polymerase) were generated from various thermostable polymerases and theDNA clamp of the thermostable DNA-binding proteinSSo7d byprotein design.[31] A fusion protein of thePCNA homologue fromArchaeoglobus fulgidus was also generated with archaeal thermostable DNA polymerases.[32] Similarly, fusion proteins of thermostable DNA polymerases with the thermostable DNA-binding protein domain of atopoisomerase (type V, withhelix-hairpin-helix motif, HhH) fromMethanopyrus kandleri were generated (TopoTaq andPfuC2).[33][34] A modified Pfu polymerase was also generated by protein design (Pfu Ultra).[35] Similar effects are also achieved with mixtures of thermostable DNA polymerases of both types with a mixing ratio of the enzyme activities of type A and B polymerases of 30 to 1,[22][36] e.g.Herculase[8] andTaqPlus[10] as a commercial mixture of Taq and Pfu polymerase,Expand as a commercial mixture of Taq and Pwo,[37]Expand High Fidelity as a commercial mixture of Taq and Tgo,[10]Platinum Taq High Fidelity as a commercial mixture of Taq and Tli (Vent),[10] andAdvantage HF 2 as a commercial mixture of Titanium Taq and an unnamed proof-reading polymerase.[10] These mixtures can be used for long-range PCR to synthesize products of up to 35kb length.[36][38] Other additives are used to help against difficultGC-rich sequences, avoid or neutralise the negative effects ofPCR inhibitors (like blood components or detergents[39] ordUTP[40]), or alter thereaction kinetics.[41]
The baseline synthesis rates (speed, productivity) of various polymerases have been compared.[8] The synthesis rate of Taq polymerase is around 60 base pairs per second. Among the unmodified thermostable DNA polymerases, only the synthesis rate of KOD polymerase is above 100 base pairs per second (approx. 120 bp/s).[11] Among the modified thermostable DNA polymerases, various mutations have been described that increase the synthesis rate.[42][43][44] KOD polymerase and some modified thermostable DNA polymerases (iProof/Phusion,Pfu Ultra,Velocity orZ-Taq) are used as a PCR variant with shorter amplification cycles (fast PCR, high-speed PCR) due to their high synthesis rate. Processivity describes the average number of base pairs before a polymerase falls off the DNA template. The processivity of the polymerase limits the maximum distance between the primer and the probe in some forms of real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR).
The error rates of various polymerases (fidelity) have been described. The error rate of Taq polymerase is 8 × 10−6 errors per base, that ofAdvantage HF 6.1 × 10−6 errors per base, that ofPlatinum Taq High Fidelity 5.8 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling, that ofTaqPlus 4 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling, that of KOD polymerase 3.5 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling, that of Tli polymerase andHerculase 2.8 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling, that ofDeep Vent 2.8 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling, that of Pfu,Phusion DNA Polymerase (identical withiProof DNA Polymerase) andHerculase II Fusion 1.3 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling and that ofPfu Ultra andPfu Ultra II 4.3 × 10−7 errors per base and doubling.[4][8][10] A newer analysis found slightly different error rates:Deep Vent (exo-) polymerase (5.0 × 10−4 errors per base and doubling), Taq polymerase (1.5 × 10−4 errors per base and doubling),Kapa HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (1.6 × 10−5 errors per base and doubling), KOD (1.2 × 10−5 errors per base and doubling),PrimeSTAR GXL (8.4 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling), Pfu (5.1 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling),Deep Vent DNA polymerase (4.0 × 10−6) errors per base and doubling,Phusion (3.9 × 10−6 errors per base and doubling), andQ5 DNA polymerase (5.3 × 10−7 errors per base and doubling).[5] Yet another found error rates of 3–5.6 × 10−6 for Taq, 7.6 × 10−6 for KOD, 2.8 × 10−6 for Pfu, 2.6 × 10−6 forPhusion, and 2.4 × 10−6 for Pwo.[6] To reduce the number of mutations in the PCR product (e.g. formolecular cloning), more template DNA and less cycles can be used in the PCR.[10]
Bacterial thermostable DNA polymerases generally produce higher product concentrations than archaeal, but with more copy errors. In the bacterial thermostable DNA polymerases, a Klenow fragment (Klen-Taq) or aStoffel fragment can be generated by deleting the exonuclease domain in the course of protein design, analogous to the DNA polymerase fromE. coli, which results in a higher product concentration.[45][15] Twoamino acids required for the exonuclease function of Taq polymerase were identified bymutagenesis asarginines at positions 25 and 74 (R25 and R74).[46] Ahistidine toglutamic acid mutation at position 147 (short: H147E) in KOD polymerase lowers the relatively high exonuclease activity of KOD.[27]
The favouring of individualnucleotides by a thermostable DNA polymerase is referred to as nucleotide specificity (bias). In PCR-basedDNA sequencing with chain termination substrates (dideoxy method), their uniform incorporation and thus unbiased generation of all chain termination products is often desired in order to enable higher sensitivity and easier analysis. For this purpose, aKlenTaq polymerase was generated by deletion and aphenylalanine at position 667 was exchanged fortyrosine bysite-directed mutagenesis (short: F667Y) and namedThermo Sequenase.[47][48] This polymerase can also be used for the incorporation of fluorescence-labelled dideoxynucleotides.[49]
The template specificity of the polymerases is increased by using hot-start polymerases, to avoid binding of primers to unwanted DNA templates or to each other at low temperatures before the beginning of the PCR.[50] Examples are theantibody-inhibited Pfu polymerasePfu Turbo, thePlatinum Pfx as a commercial KOD polymerase with an inhibiting antibody and thePlatinum Taq as an antibody-inhibited Taq polymerase.[8] Hot-start polymerases are either inhibited by inactivation withformaldehyde[51][52] (ormaleic anhydride, exo-cis-3,6-endoxo-Δ4-tetrahydropthalic anhydride, citraconic anhydride, 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride, cis-aconitic anhydride, or 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride),[53] by complexing the magnesium with phosphates[54] or by binding an antibody to their active site.[55][56] Upon heating to 95 °C, the formaldehyde dissociates from proteins,[57][58][59] or the magnesium ions are released,[54] or the antibody is denatured and released in the process.[60][61] Furthermore, polymerases can be inhibited withaptamers that denature upon heating.[62][63] A fifth variant is a polymerase adsorbed onlatex beads viahydrophobic effects, which dissolves with increasing temperature. In the sixth and oldest variant, the reaction mixture without polymerase is coated withwax and the polymerase is added on top of the cooled wax. When heated, the wax layer melts and the polymerase mixes with the reaction mixture.[64]
The standardreverse transcriptases (RNA-dependent DNA polymerases) ofretroviral origin used forRT-PCR, like theAMV- and theMoMuLV-Reverse-Transcriptase, are not thermostable at 95 °C. At the lower temperatures of areverse transcription unspecifichybridisation ofprimers to wrong sequences can occur, as well as unwantedsecondary structures in the DNA template, which can lead to unwanted PCR products and less desired PCR products. The AMV reverse transcriptase may be used up to 70 °C.[66] Also, some thermostable DNA-dependent DNA polymerases can be used as RNA-dependent DNA polymerases by exchanging Mg2+ ascofactors withMn2+, so that they may be used for an RT-PCR.[67] But since the synthesis rate of Taq with Mn2+ is relatively low, Tth was increasingly used for this approach.[68] The use of Mn2+ also increases the error rate and the necessary amount of template, so that this method is rarely used. These problems can be avoided with the thermostable3173-Polymerase from a thermophilicbacteriophage, which can withstand the high temperatures of a PCR and prefers RNA as a template.[69]
In addition to the choice of thermostable DNA polymerase, other parameters of a PCR are specifically changed in the course of PCR optimisation.
In addition to PCR, thermostable DNA polymerases are also used forRT-PCR variants, qPCR in different variants, site-specific mutagenesis and DNA sequencing. They are also used to producehybridisation probes forSouthern blot andNorthern blot by random priming. The 5'→3' exonuclease activity is used fornick translation andTaqMan, among other things, without DNA replication (amplification).
Alice Chien and colleagues were the first to characterise the thermostable Taq polymerase in 1976.[70] The first use of a thermostable DNA polymerase was byRandall K. Saiki and colleagues in 1988, introducing Taq polymerase for PCR.[71][72] The thermostability of Taq polymerase obliviated the need to add a non-thermostable DNA polymerase to the reaction after everymelting phase of the PCR, because the Taq polymerase is not denatured by heating to 95 °C during the melting phase of each cyle. In 1989, the Taq polymerasegene was cloned and the Taq polymerase was produced inEscherichia coli as arecombinant protein.[73][72] DNA of up to 35,000 basepairs was synthesized byWayne M. Barnes by using different mixtures of A and B type polymerases,[36][72] thereby creating the long-range PCR. The high synthesis rate of KOD polymerase was published in 1997 byMasahiro Takagi and colleagues,[3][72][14] thereby creating the fundamentals of high speed PCR. Other optimisations to the PCR were developed in the following years, e.g. circumventing PCR inhibitors and amplifying difficult GC-rich DNA sequences,[41] as well as modifying thermostable DNA polymerases by protein design. In 1998 the loop-mediated isothermal amplification was developed by Tsugunori Notomi and colleagues atEiken Chemical Company, using Bst polymerase at 65 °C.[74][75]
F. Akram, F. I. Shah, R. Ibrar, T. Fatima, I. U. Haq, W. Naseem, M. A. Gul, L. Tehreem, G. Haider:Bacterial thermophilic DNA polymerases: A focus on prominent biotechnological applications. In:Analytical biochemistry. Volume 671, June 2023, p. 115150,doi:10.1016/j.ab.2023.115150,PMID37054862.
^abcdefghijM. Takagi, M. Nishioka, H. Kakihara, M. Kitabayashi, H. Inoue, B. Kawakami, M. Oka, T. Imanaka:Characterization of DNA polymerase from Pyrococcus sp. strain KOD1 and its application to PCR. In:Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 63, Issue 11, 1997, p. 4504–4510.PMID9361436;PMC168769.
^abcdefghJ. Cline, J. C. Braman, H. H. Hogrefe:PCR fidelity of pfu DNA polymerase and other thermostable DNA polymerases. In:Nucleic Acids Res., Volume 24, Issue 18, 1996, p. 3546–3551.PMID8836181;PMC146123.
^abcdP. McInerney, P. Adams, M. Z. Hadi:Error Rate Comparison during Polymerase Chain Reaction by DNA Polymerase. In:Molecular biology international. 2014, p. 287430,doi:10.1155/2014/287430,PMID25197572,PMC4150459.
^abEuropean Patent 1752534A1:Hochgeschwindigkeits-PCR unter Verwendung von Hochgeschwindigkeits-DNA-Polymerase, 2005-05-12 / 2007-02-14 by Toyo Boseki (applicant) & Masaya Segawa et al. (inventors).
^P. J. Rothwell, G. Waksman:Structure and mechanism of DNA polymerases. In:Advances in protein chemistry. Volume 71, 2005, p. 401–440,doi:10.1016/S0065-3233(04)71011-6,PMID16230118.
^abH. Hashimoto, M. Nishioka, P. Fujiwara, M. Takagi, T. Imanaka, T. Inoue, Y. Kai:Crystal structure of DNA polymerase from hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus kodakaraensis KOD1. In:Journal of molecular biology. Volume 306, issue 3, February 2001, p. 469–477,doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4403,PMID11178906.
^abB. Villbrandt, H. Sobek, B. Frey, D. Schomburg:Domain exchange: chimeras of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and Thermotoga neapolitana DNA polymerase. In:Protein Eng., Vol. 13, Issue 9, 2000, p. 645–654.PMID11054459.
^W. Abu Al-Soud, P. Râdström:Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases to mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-inhibiting samples. In:Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Vol. 64, Issue 10, 1998, p. 3748–3753.PMID9758794;PMC106538.
^A. Ghasemi, A. H. Salmanian, N. Sadeghifard, A. A. Salarian, M. K. Gholi:Cloning, expression and purification of Pwo polymerase from Pyrococcus woesei. In:Iranian journal of microbiology. Volume 3, issue 3, September 2011, p. 118–122,PMID22347593,PMC3279813.
^H. Kong, R. B. Kucera, W. E. Jack:Characterization of a DNA polymerase from the hyperthermophile archaea Thermococcus litoralis. Vent DNA polymerase, steady state kinetics, thermal stability, processivity, strand displacement, and exonuclease activities. In:J Biol Chem., Volume 268, Issue 3, 1993, p. 1965–1975.PMID8420970.
^K. Böhlke, F. M. Pisani, C. E. Vorgias, B. Frey, H. Sobek, M. Rossi, G. Antranikian:PCR performance of the B-type DNA polymerase from the thermophilic euryarchaeon Thermococcus aggregans improved by mutations in the Y-GG/A motif. In:Nucleic Acids Res., Volume 28, Issue 20, 2000, p. 3910–3917.PMID11024170;PMC110800.
^K. P. Kim, H. Bae, I. H. Kim, p. T. Kwon: Cloning, expression, and PCR application of DNA polymerase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Thermococcus celer. In:Biotechnol Lett. (2011), Volume 33(2), p. 339–46.PMID20953664.
^Y. Cho, H. p. Lee, Y. J. Kim, p. G. Kang, p. J. Kim, J. H. Lee:Characterization of a dUTPase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 and its application in polymerase chain reaction amplification. In:Mar Biotechnol (NY), Volume 9, Issue 4, 2007, p. 450–458.PMID17549447.
^abJ. I. Lee, Y. J. Kim, H. Bae, p. p. Cho, J. H. Lee, p. T. Kwon:Biochemical properties and PCR performance of a family B DNA polymerase from hyperthermophilic euryarchaeon Thermococcus peptonophilus. In:Appl Biochem Biotechnol., Volume 160, Issue 6, 2010, p. 1585–1899.PMID19440663.
^D. Marsic, J. M. Flaman, J. D. Ng:New DNA polymerase from the hyperthermophilic marine archaeon Thermococcus thioreducens. In:Extremophiles, Volume 12, Issue 6, 2008, p. 775–788.PMID18670731.
^J. G. Song, E. J. Kil, p. p. Cho, I. H. Kim, p. T. Kwon:An amino acid residue in the middle of the fingers subdomain is involved in Neq DNA polymerase processivity: enhanced processivity of engineered Neq DNA polymerase and its PCR application. In:Protein Eng. Des. Sel., Volume 23, Issue 11, 2010, p. 835–842.PMID20851826.
^J. Dietrich, P. Schmitt, M. Zieger, B. Preve, J. L. Rolland, H. Chaabihi, Y. Gueguen:PCR performance of the highly thermostable proof-reading B-type DNA polymerase from Pyrococcus abyssi. In:FEMS Microbiol Lett., Volume 217, Issue 1, 2002, p. 89–94.PMID12445650.
^E. M. Kennedy, C. Hergott, p. Dewhurst, B. Kim: The mechanistic architecture of thermostable Pyrococcus furiosus family B DNA polymerase motif A and its interaction with the dNTP substrate. In:Biochemistry (2009), Volume 48(47), p. 11161–8.PMID19817489;PMC3097049.
^abT. Kuroita, H. Matsumura, N. Yokota, M. Kitabayashi, H. Hashimoto, T. Inoue, T. Imanaka, Y. Kai: Structural mechanism for coordination of proofreading and polymerase activities in archaeal DNA polymerases. In:J Mol Biol. (2005), Volume 351(2), p. 291–8.PMID16019029.doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.015.
^J. P. McDonald, A. Hall, D. Gasparutto, J. Cadet, J. Ballantyne, R. Woodgate: Novel thermostable Y-family polymerases: applications for the PCR amplification of damaged or ancient DNAs. In:Nucleic Acids Res. (2006), Volume 34(4), p. 1102–11.PMID16488882;PMC1373694.
^E. Eremeeva, P. Herdewijn:PCR Amplification of Base-Modified DNA. In:Current protocols in chemical biology. Volume 10, issue 1, March 2018, p. 18–48,doi:10.1002/cpch.33,PMID30040232.
^X. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, G. Chen, X. Wang:Enzymatic synthesis of modified oligonucleotides by PEAR using Phusion and KOD DNA polymerases. In:Nucleic acid therapeutics. Volume 25, issue 1, February 2015, p. 27–34,doi:10.1089/nat.2014.0513,PMID25517220,PMC4296748.
^Y. Wang, D. E. Prosen, L. Mei, J. C. Sullivan, M. Finney, P. B. Vander Horn: A novel strategy to engineer DNA polymerases for enhanced processivity and improved performance in vitro. In:Nucleic Acids Res. (2004), Volume 32(3), p. 1197–207.PMID14973201;PMC373405.
^M. Motz, I. Kober, C. Girardot, E. Loeser, U. Bauer, M. Albers, G. Moeckel, E. Minch, H. Voss, C. Kilger, M. Koegl:Elucidation of an archaeal replication protein network to generate enhanced PCR enzymes. In:J Biol Chem. (2002), Volume 277(18), p. 16179–88.PMID11805086.PDF.
^A. R. Pavlov, N. V. Pavlova, S. A. Kozyavkin, A. I. Slesarev:Recent developments in the optimization of thermostable DNA polymerases for efficient applications. In: Trends in Biotechnology. Volume 22, issue 5, May 2004, p. 253–260,doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.02.011,PMID15109812.
^Holly H. Hogrefe, M. Borns:High fidelity PCR enzymes. In: C.W. Dieffenbach, G.p. Dveksler (Eds.):PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual,Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2003.
^abcW. M. Barnes: PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from lambda bacteriophage templates. In:Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1994), Volume 91(6), p. 2216–20.PMID8134376;PMC43341.
^R. Tellier, J. Bukh, S. U. Emerson, R. H. Purcell:Long PCR amplification of large fragments of viral genomes: a technical overview. In:Methods in molecular biology. Volume 226, 2003, p. 167–172,doi:10.1385/1-59259-384-4:167,PMID12958497.
^M. Miura, C. Tanigawa, Y. Fujii, S. Kaneko:Comparison of six commercially-available DNA polymerases for direct PCR. In:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. Volume 55, issue 6, 2013, p. 401–406,doi:10.1590/S0036-46652013000600005,PMID24213192,PMC4105087.
^abH. Karunanathie, P. S. Kee, S. F. Ng, M. A. Kennedy, E. W. Chua:PCR enhancers: Types, mechanisms, and applications in long-range PCR. In:Biochimie. Volume 197, June 2022, p. 130–143,doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2022.02.009,PMID35231536.
^US Patent 2013034879A1:DNA Polymerases, 2012-08-02 / 2007-02-14, Fermentas UAB et Al (applicant), Remigijus Skirgaila et al. (inventors).
^US Patent 2009280539A1:DNA Polymerases and related methods, 2009-04-16 / 2009-11-12, Roche Molecular Systems Inc (applicant), Keith A. Bauer (inventor).
^W. M. Barnes:The fidelity of Taq polymerase catalyzing PCR is improved by an N-terminal deletion. In:Gene (1992), Volume 112(1), p. 29–35.PMID1551596.
^L. p. Merkens, p. K. Bryan, R. E. Moses:Inactivation of the 5'-3' exonuclease of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. In:Biochim Biophys Acta (1995), Volume 1264(2), p. 243–8.PMID7495870.
^p. Tabor, C. C. Richardson:A single residue in DNA polymerases of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I family is critical for distinguishing between deoxy- and dideoxyribonucleotides. In:Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., Volume 92, Issue 14, 1995, p. 6339–6343.PMID7603992;PMC41513.
^P. B. Vander Horn, M. C. Davis, J. J. Cunniff, C. Ruan, B. F. McArdle, p. B. Samols, J. Szasz, G. Hu, K. M. Hujer, p. T. Domke, p. R. Brummet, R. B. Moffett, C. W. Fuller:Thermo sequenase DNA polymerase and T. acidophilum pyrophosphatase: new thermostable enzymes for DNA sequencing. In:Biotechniques, Volume 22, Issue 4, 1997, p. 758–762, 764–765.PMID9105629.
^J. M. Prober, G. L. Trainor, R. J. Dam, F. W. Hobbs, C. W. Robertson, R. J. Zagursky, A. J. Cocuzza, M. A. Jensen, K. Baumeister:A system for rapid DNA sequencing with fluorescent chain-terminating dideoxynucleotides. In:Science, Volume 238, Issue 4825, 1987, p. 336–341.PMID2443975.
^R. T. D'Aquila, L. J. Bechtel, J. A. Videler, J. J. Eron, P. Gorczyca, J. C. Kaplan:Maximizing sensitivity and specificity of PCR by pre-amplification heating. In:Nucleic acids research. Volume 19, issue 13, July 1991, p. 3749,doi:10.1093/nar/19.13.3749,PMID1852616,PMC328414.
^T. G. Graham, C. Dugast-Darzacq, G. M. Dailey, X. H. Nguyenla, E. Van Dis, M. N. Esbin, A. Abidi, S. A. Stanley, X. Darzacq, R. Tjian:Open-source RNA extraction and RT-qPCR methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection. In:PLOS ONE. Volume 16, issue 2, 2021, p. e0246647,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246647,PMID33534838,PMC7857565.
^abW. M. Barnes, K. R. Rowlyk:Magnesium precipitate hot start method for PCR. In:Molecular and cellular probes. Volume 16, issue 3, June 2002, p. 167–171,doi:10.1006/mcpr.2002.0407,PMID12219733.
^N. Paul, J. Shum, T. Le:Hot start PCR. In:Methods Mol Biol. (2010), Volume 630, p. 301–18.PMID20301005.
^M. F. Kramer, D. M. Coen:Enzymatic amplification of DNA by PCR: standard procedures and optimization. In:Curr Protoc Immunol. (2001), Chapter 10, Unit 10.20.PMID18432685.
^H. FRAENKEL-CONRAT, B. A. BRANDON, H. S. OLCOTT:The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins; participation of indole groups; gramicidin. In:The Journal of biological chemistry. Volume 168, issue 1, April 1947,ISSN0021-9258, p. 99–118,PMID20291066.
^H. FRAENKEL-CONRAT, H. S. OLCOTT:The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins; cross-linking between amino and primary amide or guanidyl groups. In:Journal of the American Chemical Society. Volume 70, issue 8, August 1948,ISSN0002-7863, p. 2673–2684,PMID18876976.
^H. FRAENKEL-CONRAT, H. S. OLCOTT:Reaction of formaldehyde with proteins; cross-linking of amino groups with phenol, imidazole, or indole groups. In:The Journal of biological chemistry. Volume 174, issue 3, July 1948,ISSN0021-9258, p. 827–843,PMID18871242.
^D. E. Kellogg, I. Rybalkin, S. Chen, N. Mukhamedova, T. Vlasik, P. D. Siebert, A. Chenchik:TaqStart Antibody: "hot start" PCR facilitated by a neutralizing monoclonal antibody directed against Taq DNA polymerase. In:BioTechniques. Volume 16, issue 6, June 1994, p. 1134–1137,PMID8074881.
^D. J. Sharkey, E. R. Scalice, K. G. Christy, S. M. Atwood, J. L. Daiss:Antibodies as thermolabile switches: high temperature triggering for the polymerase chain reaction. In:Bio/technology. Volume 12, issue 5, May 1994, p. 506–509,doi:10.1038/nbt0594-506,PMID7764710.
^O. Y. Yakimovich, Y. I. Alekseev, A. V. Maksimenko, O. L. Voronina, V. G. Lunin:Influence of DNA aptamer structure on the specificity of binding to Taq DNA polymerase. In:Biochemistry. Biokhimiia. Volume 68, issue 2, February 2003, p. 228–235,doi:10.1023/a:1022609714768,PMID12693970.
^T. Noma, K. Sode, K. Ikebukuro:Characterization and application of aptamers for Taq DNA polymerase selected using an evolution-mimicking algorithm. In:Biotechnology letters. Volume 28, issue 23, December 2006, p. 1939–1944,doi:10.1007/s10529-006-9178-4,PMID16988782.
^Q. Chou, M. Russell, D. E. Birch, J. Raymond, W. Bloch:Prevention of pre-PCR mis-priming and primer dimerization improves low-copy-number amplifications. In:Nucleic Acids Res. (1992), volume 20, issue 7, p. 1717–23.PMID1579465;PMC312262.
^B. Fuchs, K. Zhang, M. G. Rock, M. E. Bolander, G. Sarkar:High temperature cDNA synthesis by AMV reverse transcriptase improves the specificity of PCR. In:Molecular biotechnology. Volume 12, issue 3, October 1999, p. 237–240,doi:10.1385/MB:12:3:237,PMID10631680.
^A. M. Carothers, G. Urlaub, J. Mucha, D. Grunberger, L. A. Chasin:Point mutation analysis in a mammalian gene: rapid preparation of total RNA, PCR amplification of cDNA, and Taq sequencing by a novel method. In:BioTechniques. Volume 7, issue 5, May 1989, p. 494–6, 498,PMID2483818.
^T. W. Myers, D. H. Gelfand:Reverse transcription and DNA amplification by a Thermus thermophilus DNA polymerase. In:Biochemistry (1991), Band 30(31), S. 7661–6.PMID1714296.
^M. J. Moser, R. A. DiFrancesco, K. Gowda, A. J. Klingele, D. R. Sugar, S. Stocki, D. A. Mead, T. W. Schoenfeld:Thermostable DNA polymerase from a viral metagenome is a potent RT-PCR enzyme. In:PLoS One (2012), volume 7(6), p. e38371.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038371.PMID22675552;PMC3366922.
^R. K. Saiki, D. H. Gelfand, P. Stoffel, P. J. Scharf, R. Higuchi, G. T. Horn, K. B. Mullis, H. A. Erlich:Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. In:Science. Volume 239, issue 4839, January 1988, p. 487–491,doi:10.1126/science.2448875,PMID2448875.
^abcdP. Ishino, Y. Ishino:DNA polymerases as useful reagents for biotechnology - the history of developmental research in the field. In:Frontiers in Microbiology. Volume 5, 2014, p. 465,doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00465,PMID25221550,PMC4148896.
^F. C. Lawyer, P. Stoffel, R. K. Saiki, K. Myambo, R. Drummond, D. H. Gelfand:Isolation, characterization, and expression in Escherichia coli of the DNA polymerase gene from Thermus aquaticus. In:Journal of Biological Chemistry. Volume 264, issue 11, April 1989, p. 6427–6437,PMID2649500.
^M. Soroka, B. Wasowicz, A. Rymaszewska:Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP): The Better Sibling of PCR? In:Cells. Volume 10, issue 8, July 2021, p. ,doi:10.3390/cells10081931,PMID34440699,PMC8393631.