 First edition cover | |
| Author | Alan Dershowitz |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Publisher | John Wiley & Sons |
Publication date | 2003 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | Print (hardcover) |
| Pages | 264 |
| ISBN | 978-0-471-46502-7 |
The Case for Israel is a 2003 book byAlan Dershowitz, a law professor atHarvard University. The work is a response to commoncriticisms of Israel.The Case for Israel was aNew York Times bestseller.[1]
Thecase has been made thatThe Case for Israel plagiarized central claims fromJoan Peters's widely discredited bookFrom Time Immemorial.[2]
The book is divided into several chapters, each of which addresses what Dershowitz identifies as being particularly strong accusations and myths about Israel, such as "Israel is the 'prime' human rights violator in the world" and "Israel is the cause of theArab–Israeli conflict." Each chapter is divided into several sections. "The Accusation" states a common criticism of Israel, "The Accusers" lists several quotations from critics supporting the accusation, "The Reality" contains a short statement contradicting the accusation, and "The Proof" contains Dershowitz's explanation of his viewpoint.Edward Said andNoam Chomsky are among the critics that he quotes the most heavily. The research assistants mentioned in the book's acknowledgements include Natalie Hershlag, the birthname ofIsraeli-American actressNatalie Portman.[3][4][5]
Dershowitz has released a sequel in 2005 championing thetwo-state solution. The book,The Case for Peace, explains what he believes is needed to be done in order to achieve peace in theIsraeli–Palestinian conflict.
The political scientistNorman Finkelstein has claimed the book is a "hoax"[6] and that some of its citations areplagiarized fromFrom Time Immemorial, a 1984 book byJoan Peters.[7]
After a heated exchange between the two onDemocracy Now!, in which Finkelstein repeatedly accused Dershowitz of plagiarism and questioned his credentials to teach at Harvard University,[8] Finkelstein released a book,Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, whose second part is aboutThe Case for Israel. The book lists many examples of text that Finkelstein claims Dershowitz to have lifted from Peters. A Harvard Law School investigation led by former Harvard presidentDerek Bok found the plagiarism charges to be without merit. Finkelstein later agreed to delete all references to "plagiarism" from his book, instead writing that Dershowitz "lifted" or "appropriated" text from Peters, but said he only did it to avoid a lawsuit.[9][10]
According toAvi Shlaim, Finkelstein's charge of plagiarism "is proved in a manner that would stand up in court."[11] In response to the feud between Dershowitz and Finkelstein, Frank Menetrez, a former editor-in-chief of theUCLA Law Review, published an analysis of the charges made against Finkelstein by Dershowitz, finding no merit in any single charge, and that, on the contrary, "Dershowitz is deliberately misrepresenting what Finkelstein wrote".[12] In a follow-up analysis he concluded that he could find "no way of avoiding the inference that Dershowitz copied the quotation from Twain from Peters'sFrom Time Immemorial, and not from the original source", as Dershowitz claimed.[12]
The political scientist Michael Desch wrote:
Not only did Dershowitz improperly present Peters's ideas, he may not even have bothered to read the original sources she used to come up with them. Finkelstein somehow managed to get uncorrected page proofs ofThe Case for Israel in which Dershowitz appears to direct his research assistant to go to certain pages and notes in Peters's book and place them in his footnotes directly (32, col. 3).[13]
Although repeatedly being approached by third parties to debate the book, Dershowitz refused on the ground that he had a "longstanding policy against debatingHolocaust deniers, revisionists, trivializers or minimizers".[14]