Template talk:Wycombe
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
The editor who decided to pen articles for eachhamlet in the county has not come acrossWP:UKCITIES.
Really could we not do as others do and combine hamlets under aLocalities heading of the main parish? That is after all how most are found: it provides a ready-made commune in the European model for how communities (supposedly, and commonly) operate with say a football team or an arts society for the whole parish, and many other features in common usually based on thecivil parish council. While this multi-article mania is indicative of growing compartmentalisation of every community, I do not support departing from the guidance, even if quite justifiably you can purport a rural neighbourhood as having more to it "visually at least" than every urban neighbourhood. The underlying reason behind this guidance seems to beWP:Notability andWhat Wikipedia is not This comment is replicated onWP:BUCKS so please add your thoughts there. -Adam37 (talk)19:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
