This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Trains:in New Zealand Trains Portal This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide torail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion. See also:WikiProject Trains to do list and theTrains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Associated projects or task forces: /  This template is supported byWikiProject New Zealand Railways.

It appears that changes toTemplate:Dynamic navigation box has broken this template, used on all the New Zealand railway line pages. Not sure how to fix it, but I will try in a day or two if no one else does. --Lee Begg01:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed that! I was quite baffled. I'd fix it if I knew how, but I honestly wouldn't have a clue how to do it. I'd be very appreciative of the work of anyone who tries to fix it! -Axver03:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chochopk has fixed the problem...

• Template talk:Dynamic navigation box#Problem with Template:NZR Lines

Many thanXNevilleDNZ19:47, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that there is a red link for Lyttelton, but no link for Ferrymead. Why does there need to be a separate article for Lyttelton? What was envisaged for it? It is on theMain South Line, so surely it should be mentioned in that article? Also, there is an article on theFerrymead Railway, should it not be listed in this template? --Matthew2518701:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrymead certainly needs a link and I'll add it now. As for Lyttelton, I'm not sure what to do there, as some sources deal with it separately - especially as until recently, its operations were distinct from the Main South Line, e.g. its commuter services. I'm not sure whether it should simply be dealt with as a subsection of the Main South Line or with its own article. Currently, I'm thinking the best idea is a small blurb on the main article with a larger dedicated article, like how a small blurb on the NIMT page then leads to a fullParaparaumu Line article. -Axver08:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It occurred to me that the proposals for a North Shore line and an Airport line in Auckland should probably be listed under the "Significant proposals" section. If so, what should they be called in the absence of "official" names? –Matthew25187 (talk)23:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the airport lines might actually have official names - I recently read something about official designations being put in place? --LJ Holden 02:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Why has the link for the North Shore line been removed? I don't see how it could seriously be suggested that it isn't a significant proposal, and is even still occasionally mentioned in the news media. If it was removed for being a red link (no article yet), then this would probably be a violation ofWP:REDLINK. —Matthew25187 (talk)12:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These should really be added to the template; especially with theSanson Tramway already being listed.LJ Holden02:13, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've started aBush tramway article --LJ Holden04:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class rail transport pages
• NA-importance rail transport pages
• Template-Class New Zealand Railways pages
• NA-importance New Zealand Railways pages
• All WikiProject Trains pages