This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related toKorea. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project and contribute to thediscussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage offood anddrink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please reviewWP:Trivia andWP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the{{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,select here.
Please use another picture. Kimbap is Japanese, not Korean. It's the Korean word for the Japanese food during the Colonial period, an era of Korean history where Japanese people try to assimilate and destroy Korean culture. There must be a more representative picture of Korean food than one withsushi.Curb Chain (talk)13:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the same thing. As far as I know, Gimbap is at best a Korean interpretation of maki-zushi. Even if that were not the case, the gimbap dish presented in the picture seemed quite haphazardly cut and served. I thought about changing it to File:Gimchi.jpg, File:Korean.cuisine-Bulgogi-01.jpg or File:Korean cuisine-Bibimbap-08.jpg, but File:Korean.food-Hanjungsik-01.jpg seemed to be the most aesthetically pleasing (personally). I'll gladly take any criticisms.Humorahead01 (talk)—Precedingundated comment added19:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]
In fact, the template used to be a rather massive nav box, until it was condensed to a side barin 2011. Unfortunately, the guy that did the rebuilding, did not move the side bar to a proper place.The Bannertalk19:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Exsqueze me? Whatch yu talkin' about Willis? I most certainly put it in the proper spot, at the head of the article. That is where these types of templates go. Stopping away in much maligned huff... --Jeremy(blah blah •I did it!)21:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you did, and somebody else reverted it. But the effect is quite unfortunate. I have done a few now but I don't know how many more has to be done. No worth fighting over.The Bannertalk22:10, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question about Staples: is there a good reason why Kimchi bokkeumbap is listed as a staple, when it seems to be a composed dish including two other items on the list? Kimchi, however, is not. I'm not Korean, so I won't change this, but is it possibly accurate?— Precedingunsigned comment added by69.86.48.255 (talk)03:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just put all the non-English text in transliteration templates. I'm not 100% confident this is correct (do these rules still apply in templates like these? I think they do?), but my understanding of theMOS:LANG andMOS:FOREIGNITALIC seems to suggest thistoobigtokale (talk)00:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
