Virginia Tech shooting is aformer featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, checkthe nomination archive) and why it was removed.
While thebiographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced orpoorly sourced contentious material about living personsmust be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please seethis noticeboard.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofCrime and Criminal Biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofDisaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofDeath on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofVirginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Virginia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofVirginia Tech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Virginia TechWikipedia:WikiProject Virginia TechTemplate:WikiProject Virginia TechVirginia Tech
I just reverted some minor vandalism. Someone changed the first sentence to: "TheVictoria Tech shooting was a shooting that occurred onFebruary 5, 2020, atLos Leones 2015, Providencia, in Santiago, Chile.Christian Flores, an undergraduate student at the university..."
I hope this is just a prank. Just in case it is not: is there some precedent on Wikipedia how to react to this? I guess this is not the first time such a thing has happened.— Precedingunsigned comment added byKaffeekantate (talk •contribs)16:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The main body of the article focused on the attacks wildly fluctuates between past and present tense, as well as formal and casual language. Unsure what direction to take it, but my familiarity with similar timelined articles is to use present tense (Person then walks to so and so and does so and so). I might come back when I have more time and rework things, but if anyone else wants to take the time, I think the body could benefit from some tweakingEquirax (talk)18:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, looking through the article again, it is RIFE with typos and poor grammar. I read this page a few months ago and everything is fine, there is a lot of cleaning up that needs to be done.Equirax (talk)19:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I looked through the revision history, an anonymous editor did a complete rewrite of much of the section I’m talking about. I’m on mobile so I don’t know how to revert edits, but the November 11th revisions are awfulEquirax (talk)19:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. The entire body is a mess, it reads like a high schooler wrote it. Too many intermediary edits have been made, so someone will have to undo all of this manually23.240.245.227 (talk)23:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I edited the entire article to alter the past and present-tense issues on the 24th of November. I decided to apply past-tense in the article as I have seen it used in other historical articles, but if you would like to change it feel free to. I found the way it was previously structured to be abhorrent. Really bloody poor effort on behalf of whoever had been editing it.N2O Calico (talk)00:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Motive of cho are possibily retaliation to bullying , misantrophy, and mental illnessIs there any instance that this shoot is retaliation to misantrophy and retaliation to mental illness.This is confusing because the motice states he retaliates to three things not one.2404:8000:1027:85F6:895F:B539:A4E:C2ED (talk)06:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
