This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Television:British /StationsLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles abouttelevision programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you canjoin the discussion.To improve this article, please refer to thestyle guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported bythe British television task force. This article is supported bythe Television stations task force (assessed asLow-importance).

It's not aimed at any age. It's who ever wants to watch it.MJN SEIFER23:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a few Edits:

1. Changed "British" to "English" as that is the prefered term.

2. Removed the statement it is "Aiming" Tiny Pop because it's not. It's who ever wants to watch it.

3. Updated the tiny pop section

4. Removed the statement that tiny pop is finished, because it hasn't.

5. Removed the word "Children's" as films and music are amined at fans not ages.MJN SEIFER 19:56, 26 November 2006 (HIT)

Should the phrase "It's brother channel is Pop" should be "It's sister channel is Pop", as this is what channels owned by the same people are generally referred to as?Garej09:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo-tinypop.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk)13:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been tagged since Sept 2010 for lack of references. The main culprit for this was the long list of programmes which was completely unverified and quite likely to have been subject to vandalism (addition of incorrect information). Once tagged, material cannot be allowed to stay indefinitely: there has been plenty of opportunity for any of the regular editors of this article to fix the problem, but none has done so. Hence I have removed the unverified content, per our policy onverifiability.

From now on, please do not reinstate or add any information to the article without providing a reference to areliable source. I'll be watching this article for a while, and will be happy to engage in reasoned discussion about this issue. Thanks,  —SMALLJIM 12:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It may be worth having the discussion in one place -Talk:Pop_(UK_and_Ireland)#Removal_of_unverified_informationBonusballs (talk)09:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'll reply to your message there as soon as I can (though it may take a while). I wonder if anyone else, e.g. the person/people behind the IPs that are reinstating the unreferenced material, will make their case. To him/her/them: the use of discussion to resolve problems is a basic principle of Wikipedia, and if you're not prepared to explain your reasons when asked, then your continued edits will hold no weight and the assumption ofediting in good faith will eventually turn to consideration ofdisruptive editing.  —SMALLJIM 10:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

86.138.156.214 - It's ridiculous having a list of non notable/redlinked programmes, Anyway the programmeLearn to Dance doesn't have its own article because it's not notable yet .... You could always delink it & add some sort of cite next it :),
Cheers,→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→18:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tell that toSMALLJIM . The admin talked me in to adding it back in.86.138.156.214 (talk)18:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well ignore him, You make your own edits and not what others tell you :)→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→18:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can I when that admin talked me in to adding them back in the first place?86.138.156.214 (talk)18:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Davey2010,86.138.156.214. I hope we can sort out this dispute here. See if these bullets help.

1. Notability is a criterion that we use to determine whether a topic can have its own article. It's not relevant to the content of existing articles.
2. There's no doubt thatLearn to Dance should be included in a list of Tiny Pop's "defining programmes" (if that's going to be our criterion for inclusion), because it is indisputably there on the web page athttp://cscmediagroup.com/showreels/322/Tiny-Pop.
3. However, itis debatable whetherLearn to Dance should have a red link. An editor typically adds such a link if they think there is a likelihood that the topic could be notable enough to have its own article in the future. Now I don't know anything about this programme, but the fact that it's included among the channel owner's "defining programmes" is some indication that it might be, though third-party reliable sources would be required to confirm it (per the Notability guideline).
4. As I said on IP's talk page (regarding the similar content atPop (UK and Ireland)), I don't think we should include the other programmes that are only shown in the showreel (about a minute of Flash animation on the same page which, I believe includesMy Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic,The Adventures of Chuck and Friends, andMaya the Bee). There are two reasons for this: there's no indication that they are also considered by the channel owner as "defining programmes", and also a reader of our article who checks the web page wouldn't see these in the list. Hence my suggested change to Pop (UK and Ireland).[1] which I think we should adopt here too. We have to report what the references actually say: we don't overlay them with our own interpretations.

I hope this helps,  —SMALLJIM 19:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smalljim - Ah I wasn't aware it was on the showreel thing/there website, I did suggest above the IP could instead add a cite instead :) Thanks for your help→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→20:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm glad that you can see the reasonable path. Now hoping to get a comment from the IP. Hello!  —SMALLJIM 23:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well there's been no response from the IP so I've implemented the more accurate referencing as set out in bullet 4 above. No problem if someone wants to remove the redlink fromLearn to Dance on the basis that it's not likely to warrant its own article.  —SMALLJIM 23:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a message for you Tiny Pop: please add Bluey to your channel

Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= or|ans= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

editDylan6765 (talk)21:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide areliable source if appropriate.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)21:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sureGigantosaurus andPJ Masks are on Disney+ internationally, so shouldn't they both have a thing in parenthesis that says "Also onDisney+ as an acquired programme?"2601:280:C600:CFA0:B494:FAD9:BFC7:FF04 (talk)23:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they should. So yeah.2601:280:CA7F:9490:280F:9E3A:85B6:F644 (talk)21:12, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while, but I still say thatGigantosaurus andPJ Masks should have "Also on Disney+ as an acquired programme" written in parenthesis.2601:280:CA7F:F690:F0AB:D6B7:713C:E514 (talk)20:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= or|ans= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Can you also the grammar of this page? Can you add these links to this page? filmon.com/channel/tiny-pop, dubdb.fandom.com/wiki/Tiny_Pop. Thank you.2601:205:C002:D1E0:65C7:D311:D9E1:6839 (talk)03:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide areliable source if appropriate. What about the grammar? As for the links, seeWP:ELNOCannolis (talk)04:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean these links.filmon.com/channel/tiny-pop [dubdb.fandom.com/wiki/Tiny_Pop] . You should add it in references and history.

 Not done: The links are not appropriate as external links, please read what Cannolis wrote above. --Ferien(talk)07:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a Message for you Please Add The Shows

• Sea of Love
• Kit and Kate
• Toot! Toot! Cory Carson90.194.207.234 (talk)19:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add the 3 Shows Now They Airing on 2 January 2023 they called

• Sea of Love (A 2022 Netflix Series)
• Kit and Kate (A 2014 French Series)
• Toot! Toot! Cory Carson (A 2020 Netflix Series)90.194.207.234 (talk)10:46, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Just Think That 3 Shows Arriving on Tiny Pop called Sea of Love Kit and Kate and Toot! Toot! Cory Carson airing from 10AM to 10:30AM and 4PM to 4:30PM on Tiny Pop's New Schedule Coming Out 1 Day After New Year's Day arriving on 2 January 2023 times on Mornings

• 10:00 Sea of Love
• 10:10 Kit and Kate
• 10:15 Toot Toot! Cory Carson

and Afternoons

• 16:00 Sea of Love
• 16:10 Kit and Kate
• 16:15 Toot! Toot! Cory Carson

Arriving for Tiny Pop's School Block and Playtime Block90.194.207.234 (talk)13:36, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry But They Are Removed from the Schedule Update on Monday 1 January 202390.194.207.234 (talk)10:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You missingJeremy and Vine can you add it please it's Missing. 🤔94.3.50.136 (talk)21:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please addGrizzy and the Lemmings it is airing on the channel94.3.50.136 (talk)20:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add the two missing shows, They called

• Jeremy & Vine (Joined 2 January 2023)
• Grizzy and the Lemmings (Joined March 2023)

2A02:C7C:C826:3A00:BCBC:DC1F:B229:1A02 (talk)03:16, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi InsertChannelNameHere, Why is Tiny Pop going to cease operations on 20 March.2A02:C7C:C826:3A00:5D62:A63C:91:4329 (talk)14:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This year, Tiny POP is shutting down on 20 March 2024 but shows will move to the POP Player and daytime shows will move to POP to air from 6AM to 4PM every weekend.

POP and POP MAX will still air on TV, But without Tiny POP.

On 20 March 2024, The channel will cease operations at 12AM and the final show will beGrizzy and the Lemmings on 19 March at 11:50PM.

Shows like Sea of Love, Kit & Kate and other upcoming shows have to be cancelled.

Thank You!

InsertChannelNameHere will talk to me soon!2A02:C7C:C826:3A00:5D62:A63C:91:4329 (talk)16:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny pop kids channel2A02:C7C:6B9F:2500:3571:3DE:8299:D2FC (talk)07:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny Pop Changing to Pop90.221.184.163 (talk)07:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class television articles
• Low-importance television articles
• Start-Class British television articles
• Unknown-importance British television articles
• British television task force articles
• Start-Class Television stations articles
• Low-importance Television stations articles
• Television stations task force articles
• WikiProject Television articles