There isn't anything in this article that demonstrates how ashow dog differs from any other registeredpurebred dog that may or may not be taken to a dog show. A show dog isn't a type of dog or anything separate from any other dog of a specific breed, and any registered dog can be shown in conformation shows sponsored by its registry. Purebred dog isn't even a separate type of dog either, it is just another way of saying dog from a registered breed. I think what is in this article now is adequately covered in other articles, and that it is misleading to imply that there is a separate special type of dog calledshow dog.--Hafwyn (talk)17:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have rearranged some of the information and replaced some vague statements with quotes based on the same footnotes. Added more references and removed the banner requesting more references.
This article should have more information specific to show (space) dogs (why is it written like that? Normally it is written as one word, is there some reason why it is written as two words here?) If there is a reason for a separate article, it should have separate information, not just information from other articles. Perhaps detailing the life or use or whatever it is that makes show (space) dogs different from regular (space) dogs, besides just being purebred (lots of pets and working dogs are purebred.)
Sections that should be added might include these topics--
--Hafwyn (talk)19:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Never ever start an article with a negative claim. Show dogs are ____ not, show dogs are not, x, y, z, p, q. Don't lead an article with a criticism section. Why is there a "dog shows" section without the relationship actually stated? Show dog in common parlance refers to the ones that show up at the Westminster whatever its called. Come on people, anyone?--Tznkai (talk)03:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions atTemplate:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! --Khazar2 (talk)00:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]