This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to theoccult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county ofKent inSouth East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofscience,pseudoscience,pseudohistory andskepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Magic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofmagic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagicWikipedia:WikiProject MagicTemplate:WikiProject MagicMagic
Reading David Wootton's effort to ascribe Family of Love membership to R Scot, it strikes me as a valiant academic effort, but in the end it comes across as rather groping. It is speculative: the evidence offered is Wootton's own debatable interpretation of certain overlapping ideas. Wootton doesn't seem to consider enough beyond the English Channel whereas the majority of Scot's argument is for or against numerous sources from the continent. To me it seems best to focus on a fuller understanding of Scot's actual citations before going too far into speculation about mysterious maybe-sources.Lewismr (talk)17:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.png)
