Talk:Reeva Steenkamp
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theReeva Steenkamp article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| While thebiographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced orpoorly sourced contentious material about living personsmust be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please seethis noticeboard. |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article iswritten inSouth African English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,realise,analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
 | A fact fromReeva Steenkamp appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theDid you know column on 30 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in theTop 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
 Archives | |
| |
This page has archives. Sections older than365 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Please can we discussthe creation of this section. Including it in the career section is not only wrong it is insensitive. This media coverage relates to her death, and unless it is specifically about Steenkamp the person and not about the case in general I think it should be kept in the trial article alone which includes comprehensive media coverage of the trial in order to avoid inappropriateWP:CONTENTFORKING. Why only include that specific programme and not the others? (I am not suggesting we include them all as we have a whole other article for that, but we can't cherry pick what we include here for whatever reason as that leads to an unbalanced article.)HelenOnline05:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Added Tags to the article as it does not need all of the irrelevant info on the page.All of the irrelevant info make the page read like a resumé of everything she has done / accomplished in life.Viewpaste (talk)04:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added[undue weight? –discuss] Tag
The judges at the appeal court did find him guilty of murder. Does anyone who knows more about the SA legal system explain otherwise?PatGallacher (talk)17:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onReeva Steenkamp. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag tohttp://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/15/89351.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)21:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I realise that assigning people to a particular nationality may not be straightforward on Wikipedia. However I question if we should describe her as partly British even if she was technically entitled to apply for British citizenship. If you grant this approach e.g. we could describe all Jewish people as Israeli, since they are technically entitled to apply for Israeli citizenship. Resolving this could require detailed investigation of the citizenship laws of various countries, getting into OR.PatGallacher (talk)17:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]