Talk:REC Limited
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theREC Limited article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article was originally written by several now banned sockpupetts presumable paid editors. There were previous attempts at cleanup, but not only were they unwisely reverted, but more drastic work is necessary. (This is not unusual in articles that had their origin in a succession of several undeclared paid editors--they each add their own share of the promotionalism ) I have removed extensive duplciation from the initial sections, and reorganized them logically. I also removed various phrases of praise and importance that should have been removed much earlier. This is a partial edit only- I have not yet gotten to the history section and later parts of the article.
I suppose I should mention that if it can not be successfully cleaned, only alternative to deletion will be stubbification. DGG ( talk)03:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
