Talk:Papal ban of Freemasonry
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to thePapal ban of Freemasonry article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12Auto-archiving period:6 months  |
 | Papal ban of Freemasonry was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet thegood article criteria at the time (August 21, 2006). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it,please do; it may then berenominated. |
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article had "multiple issues" templates on it from 2016 saying the article relied too much on primary sources and sources too close to the subject. Since we're now 6 years later, I don't know what the article looked like in 2016, but it now appears to have a reasonable number of third-party sources, keeping in mind that when discussing official Church position or teaching, it will probably be necessary and prudent to cite to some official Church sources such as canon law, papal encyclicals, catechism etc. In addition, the talk page contained no information about why the templates were there (for example, specific sections that were problematic). So, I removed the templates.TheBlinkster (talk)12:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcedhere andhere176.200.172.46 (talk)10:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer to call this article "Papal ban on Freemasonry" as placing a ban "on" something is more usual language, for example in the articleSmoking ban there are several references to a ban on smoking, none to a ban of smoking. Any thoughts?BobKilcoyne (talk)08:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
