Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Ontario Highway 132

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlesOntario Highway 132 has been listed as one of theEngineering and technology good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it.
Review: October 14, 2017. (Reviewed version).
This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCanada:OntarioLow‑importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofCanada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Ontario.
WikiProject iconCanada Roads:OntarioMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of theCanada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide toroads inCanadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Topics:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Ontario
Note icon
This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.
Note icon
This article needs aKML file. If it already has one, add|needs-kml=no to the Canada Roads banner.

The following discussion is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review istranscluded fromTalk:Ontario Highway 132/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:Jackdude101 (talk·contribs)18:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – seeWP:WIAGA for criteria

Passes the threshold "immediate failure" criteria: no cleanup banners, no obvious copyright infringements, etc.Jackdude101 talk cont18:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is itwell written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Sticks to the well-sourced facts.
    B. It complies with themanual of style guidelines forlead sections,layout,words to watch,fiction, andlist incorporation:
    Remove the period in the caption for the first thumbnail. Also, there is a period missing in the first paragraph of the History section.Jackdude101 talk cont18:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is itverifiable withno original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance withthe layout style guideline:
    B. Allin-line citations are fromreliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged orlikely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow thescientific citation guidelines:
    C. It containsno original research:
    D. It contains nocopyright violations norplagiarism:
  3. Is itbroad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses themain aspects of the topic:
    B. It staysfocused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (seesummary style):
  4. Is itneutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is itstable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoingedit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, byimages?
    A. Images aretagged with theircopyright status, andvalid fair use rationales are provided fornon-free content:
    B. Images arerelevant to the topic, and havesuitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    @Floydian: This article is a short-and-sweet affair, and is ship-shape overall. Simply address the minor issues above to get this review passed.Jackdude101 talk cont18:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixes have been implemented. Review passed.Jackdude101 talk cont18:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ontario_Highway_132&oldid=1202287790"
Categories:
Hidden categories:
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp