This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Christianity:JesusTop‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofChristianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Top This article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is within the scope of theJesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to beinactive. Religious texts (defunct) This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to bedefunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts BibleTop‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theBible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible Top This article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Somebody should check Nestle-Alland maybe, but it seems that Vaticanus is *not* complete, but lacks 17:21 (as does Sinaiticus).https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Vaticanus and some other googling affirm thi, at least.Adam.gibson (talk)17:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the digitized manuscripts directly. No surprise that 17:21 is omitted from the text of Vaticanus as Sinaiticus. Not a missing piece of vellum, but simply not included in the text, passing from 20 to 22 directly. This wouldn't have to be mentioned at this point in the article. But, rather than remove the comment from Sinaiticus I made a parallel comment for Vaticanus. The issue probably *should* be discussed later in the article ashttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_18#Verse_11 . Many modern translations in English omit v21 on this basis.Adam.gibson (talk)14:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class Christianity articles
• Top-importance Christianity articles
• WikiProject Christianity articles
• C-Class Bible articles
• Top-importance Bible articles
• WikiProject Bible articles

• Talk pages with comments before the first section