Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Mao Zedong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Skip to table of contents
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theMao Zedong article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:Index,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11Auto-archiving period:30 days 
Discussions on this pageoften lead toprevious arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in thearchives before commenting.
This article iswritten inBritish English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,defence,artefact,analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus.
While thebiographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced orpoorly sourced contentious material about living personsmust be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please seethis noticeboard.
This level-3 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography:Military /Politics and Government /Core
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe military biography work group (assessed asHigh-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe politics and government work group (assessed asTop-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is listed on the project'score biographies page.
WikiProject iconChina:HistoryTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofChina related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Chinese history (assessed asTop-importance).
WikiProject iconAsiaMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofAsia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDeathHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofDeath on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCold WarTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theCold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history:Biography /Asian /Chinese /World War II /Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation:criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy:criterion met
  3. Structure:criterion met
  4. Grammar and style:criterion met
  5. Supporting materials:criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Chinese military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
WikiProject iconPhilosophy:Philosophers /Social and political /Eastern /ContemporaryMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related tophilosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join thegeneral discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Philosophers
Taskforce icon
Social and political philosophy
Taskforce icon
Eastern philosophy
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy
WikiProject iconAtheismMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofatheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit theproject page.

To do

Join WikiProject atheism andbe bold.

Be consistent

  • Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (seelayout style,"The perfect article" andFeatured articles).
  • Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or seeinfo box)
  • Ensure atheism-related articles are members ofAtheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Articles to improve

Create

  • Articles on notable atheists


Expand

Immediate attention

  • State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
  • False choice intoFalse dilemma: discuss whether you arefor oragainst this mergehere
  • Clarify references inAtheism using footnotes.
  • Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.
WikiProject iconPoliticsHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSocialismTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsocialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
The subject of this article iscontroversial and content may be indispute. When updating the article,be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.Content must be written from aneutral point of view. Includecitations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Section sizes
Section size forMao Zedong (53 sections)
Section nameByte
count		Section
total
(Top)10,99410,994
English romanisation of name1,1291,129
Early life5211,413
Youth and the Xinhai Revolution: 1893–19116,8346,834
Fourth Normal School of Changsha: 1912–19194,5274,527
Early revolutionary activity3519,659
Beijing, anarchism, and Marxism: 1917–19193,1793,179
New Culture and political protests: 1919–19205,3395,339
Founding the Chinese Communist Party: 1921–19225,6885,688
Collaboration with the Kuomintang: 1922–19275,4185,418
Civil War7319,364
Nanchang and Autumn Harvest Uprisings: 19272,9642,964
Base in Jinggangshan: 1927–19286,2476,247
Jiangxi Soviet Republic of China: 1929–19345,6885,688
Long March: 1934–19354,3924,392
World War II7,7547,754
Leadership of China9642,519
Establishment of the People's Republic of China4,2834,283
Korean War1,7101,710
Social reform6,9726,972
Three-anti and Five-anti Campaigns2,5212,521
Five-year plans5,1025,102
Military projects2,3922,392
Great Leap Forward6,5576,557
Split from Soviet Union3,0813,081
Third Front3,8813,881
Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution5,9245,924
State visits1,4751,475
Death and aftermath8,9578,957
Legacy9,45941,375
In China7,6247,624
Outside China9,6529,652
Third World3,5203,520
Military strategy1,9901,990
Literature1,6301,630
Public image7,5007,500
Genealogy176,209
Ancestors792792
Wives666666
Siblings1,0641,064
Children3,6703,670
Personal life3,3793,379
Writings and calligraphy5,9517,382
Literary works1,4311,431
Portrayal in media2,9222,922
See also132132
Notes2626
References3030
Bibliography3,4613,461
Further reading924924
External links11610,426
General1,3981,398
Commentary8,9128,912
Total199,530199,530


Semi-protected edit request on 1 March 2025

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= or|ans= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

change

Yang Kaihui (1901–1930) of Changsha: married 1921 to 1927, executed by the KMT in 1930; mother to Mao Anying, Mao Anqing, and Mao Anlong

to

Yang Kaihui (1901–1930) of Changsha: married 1920 to 1927, executed by the KMT in 1930; mother to Mao Anying, Mao Anqing, and Mao Anlong

The marriage start time should be 1920, which was already mentioned in the summary panel, and here it creates conflicting information. Alsohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Kaihui states they married in 1920 winterNobodyxxxyyy (talk)08:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneWarriorglance(talk to me)10:41, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We need better infobox photo

[edit]

GreatLeader1945 TALK18:33, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Talk:Mao Zedong/Archive 11 § Lead photo
@Folly Mox, you said atCommons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mao Zedong in 1959 thatWP:URAAseems to show that the copyright term for URAAed photographs from the PRC as "50 pr", which would mean that these images are free as of 2009. Does anyone else have thoughts about this vis à vis potentially usingFile:Mao Zedong 1959 color.jpg as the lead image?Remsense ‥ 论19:56, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lead edits

[edit]

User:Y-S.Ko, can you be more specific about what exactly in these diffs (Special:Diff/1286602815/1286645330) that you object to? You reverted several improvements in my view, including:

  • Correction on the timeline of Mao's librarian job and the May Fourth Movement. As the article states, he had already left Beijing for Changsha when the movement began, and participated in it there.
  • More clear description of the Great Leap Foward: "aiming to transform China's economy fromagrarian toindustrial" vs. "aimed to rapidly collectivise agriculture and industrialise the country."
  • Opening the last paragraph with "Mao's legacy is deeply controversial." to prime the reader for the next sentences, which take both sides of the debate on his legacy.
  • Various link and wording improvements, like "introduced" instead of "exposed", a link to "Five-year plans of China" instead of "Industry of China", "which killed millions" to emphasize the catastrophe of the famine in the chronology, etc.

—Goszei (talk)21:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My worry is about the last two.
(1) "controversial" issue: InTalk:Mao_Zedong/Archive_10#Mao_controversial_figure?, there are readers who felt problematic to the word "controversial". Second, I don't think "controversial"do not summarize Legacy section. In Legacy section, there are opinions about Mao is somewhat right, and somewhat wrong. But the survey 85% in China have similar assessment is far from "controversial". I want more appropriate word. How about "diverse opinions" or something. But I cannot find appropriate word. ("Controversial" is not)
(2) InTalk:Mao_Zedong/Archive_11#Recent_change, there are consensus agreeing about "trimming deaths for Great Leap Forward, namely that we already have a good deal of millions of death material in the lead."
These are the last consensus about this article. Therefore, I reverted your edits.Y-S.Ko (talk)23:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can get on board with "controversial" not being the best word. What about describing his legacy as "deeply divisive" or "deeply contested"? In the future, I ask that you please only revert the specific parts which you object to. I have restored the changes besides the ones being discussed. —Goszei (talk)23:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the survey 85% in China have similar assessment makes even "divisive" or "contested" problematic. I once thought "ambivalent assessment", but I suspected even this word cannot summarize Legacy section properly. "Important and influential" is used in Legacy section. If you want opening sentence in last paragraph of lead, how about "important and influential"?Y-S.Ko (talk)00:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We aren't just talking about his legacy as perceived by people in modern-day China, but in general (historical, scholarly, within the international left, etc.). His legacy is unequivocally controversial/contested by these standards, just asChiang Kai-shek orJoseph Stalin's are, as noted in their respective leads. It goes without saying from the rest of the lead that his leadership was "important and influential". —Goszei (talk)19:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I often find "controversial" to be a bit of an empty statement in our articles. I am more interested in "contested legacy" although some might still say that is not very concrete.JArthur1984 (talk)20:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I revised your edit, explaining why in edit summary.Y-S.Ko (talk)00:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New infobox Photo

[edit]

On what grounds was the old photo removed? The new one is of a lower quality and at a funny angle.90.212.103.38 (talk)09:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mao_Zedong&oldid=1287449901"
Categories:
Hidden categories:
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp