![]() | This page isnot a forum for general discussion aboutLoma Linda, California. Any such commentsmay be removed orrefactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions aboutLoma Linda, California at theReference desk. |
![]() | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
when you read the article, it puts down its neighboring towns. i thought that a encyclopedia has to be neutral. this article is not neutral. needs to be revised in order to have neutrality75.16.41.60 (talk)20:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are also good parts of Colton and San Bernardino, plus when you get down toGrand Terrace, California towardsRiverside rated one of the 100-150 best places to live in the early 2010's according to two quality of living standards surveys of all of the US' major cities and suburban communities, and Loma Linda falls in the same list (I read at #85, while Grand Terrace was at #114) including considerations for local climate, property values and closeness to good-paying jobs.71.102.21.238 (talk)22:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here are some resources for anyone who'd like to take a crack at writing up a history section:
--TorriTorri(Talk to me!)22:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onLoma Linda, California. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online09:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm skeptical about this claim. None of the three footnotes following it reference this claim directly. Loma Linda Market (to which I guess the claim refers) doesn't sell meat at all, but Staters and Wal-Mart certainly do, and I'm pretty sure that Clark's sells a very small range of organic, non-GMO meat as well. All three have a much larger square footage than Loma Linda Market. Remember - only around 40% of the city's population are Adventists, and not all Adventists are strictly and totally vegetarian.LDGE (talk)05:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onLoma Linda, California. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)10:18, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onLoma Linda, California. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)10:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]