This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oftechnology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofbusiness articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Is there a reason this shouldn't be merged intoOPPO? It seems a bit frivolous to have a seperate page for the products, evenApple Inc. leaves the product descriptions on the main page.Xevus11 (talk)06:01, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Xevus11: It was my idea. The reasoning is that Oppo has alot of different phones and it would be irrelevant and make theOppo article too long and unreadable taking into account for future phones. An example where I have done this is theXiaomi article where we have been shortening it lately and separating info in separate articles for readability, no one seems to have objections so far. My reasoning forApple Inc. not having a separate page is they have fewer products and or product lines so it is possible to summarise each product line in the main article and go in depth for each product separately. Since each individual phone from Oppo does not have it's separate page, I was thinking this would be a better place to put them all and let the Oppo article concern more about the company rather than phones.Araratic |talk06:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I don't think you understood what this page move was talking about. It is regarding the capitalisation or not of "Oppo", not whether this article should exist. Anyways, the arguments for that are above in the previous discussion. ~Araratic|talk12:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
