Talk:Lewisite
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The two models show different geometries for the same molecule, as the geometry surrounding the arsenic different. I would imagine the ball-and-stick model is correct, because the arsenic atom has a lone pair.Jed 20012 (talk)03:40, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onLewisite. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online07:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left atTalk:Lewisite/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Followingseveral discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
|---|---|
| The article asserts that "stockpiles of Lewisite were neutralized with bleach and dumped into the Gulf of Mexico" citing Code Red - Weapons of Mass Destruction [Online Resource - Blister Agents]. I strongly suspect that this is incorrect. The total amount of Lewisite dumped in the ocean by the U.S. exceeds 11,000 tons; see: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment (ODUSD[I&E])). Defense Environmental Programs Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Report to Congress, March 2007. Appendix R, Figure R-1. Professor Joel Vilensky describes the sea disposal operations on pages 108-111 of his book (Vilensky, J. A. Dew of death: the story of Lewisite, America’s WorldWar I weapon of mass destruction; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN, 2005). He indicates that the agent was dumped untreated, which is also supported by the ODUSD[I&E] report. I would suggest deleting the reference to neutralization and the Gulf of Mexico. 65.216.138.253 (talk)18:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] | |
Last edited at 18:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC).Substituted at 21:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onLewisite. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)07:14, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
