Talk:Konrad von Hochstaden
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
http://failblog.org/2010/02/04/stone-sculpture-fail/—Precedingunsigned comment added by98.229.177.239 (talk)14:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
this is a re-touched photograph. This awful carving is the support for the statue of the bishop. They have jiggered with the photo to remove the bishop & just show the support. This creates the false impression the carving is of the bishop, which it is not.—Precedingunsigned comment added by116.48.71.75 (talk)14:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The photo is authentic, the statue was being mended elsewhere at that time. It is from the town hall, though, as stated below the other image.Benito (talk)14:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why is that the base of the statue?--Keesto (talk)02:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Seriously, how has this not been addressed? How is that not in the article proper? Someone with actual information on this subject, please elucidate us on the matter. -- Random Internet Person Checking Up On Facebook Image Only To Find Next To No Information On Wikipedia 20:30, 11 January 2015
What reason/history is the vulgar demented base of the statue???continued silence is admitting that he was being publicly shamed . For all time ??38.178.83.52 (talk)13:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
