Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Jon Moxley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlesJon Moxley has been listed as one of theSports and recreation good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it.
Review: May 7, 2020. (Reviewed version).
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theJon Moxley article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1,2Auto-archiving period:3 months 
This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page.
This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography:Sports and Games
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe sports and games work group (assessed asLow-importance).
WikiProject iconProfessional wrestlingMid‑importance
WikiProject iconJon Moxley is within the scope ofWikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related toprofessional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit theproject to-do page, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and contribute todiscussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconOhio:CincinnatiLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Ohio, which collaborates onOhio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to currentdiscussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Cincinnati (assessed asLow-importance).

Tip: Anchors arecase-sensitive in most browsers.

This article containsbroken links to one or more targetanchors:

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking thepage history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed |Report an error

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review istranscluded fromTalk:Jon Moxley/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:Lee Vilenski (talk·contribs)10:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status,over the next couple of days.Thank you for nominating the article forGA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors couldrefrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed.Lee Vilenski(talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

[edit]
  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links

[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

General

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (seehere for what the criteria are, andhere for what they are not)
  1. It isreasonably well written.
    a(prose, spelling, and grammar): b(MoS forlead,layout,word choice,fiction, andlists):
  2. It isfactually accurate andverifiable.
    a(reference section): b(citations toreliable sources): c(OR): d(copyvio andplagiarism):
  3. It isbroad in its coverage.
    a(major aspects): b(focused):
  4. It follows theneutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It isstable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated byimages and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a(images are tagged and non-free content havefair use rationales): b(appropriate use withsuitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]

Thanks for the reply. I believe I have dealt all of the issues in the best manner possible, let me know when you can get around to having a look,@Lee Vilenski:.DTH89(sexy talk page)10:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did a couple small edits and I'm happy to pass now. Best Wishes,Lee Vilenski(talkcontribs)11:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much.DTH89(sexy talk page)12:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jon_Moxley&oldid=1275979424"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp