Talk:History of Japan
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Cite error:There are<ref> tags on this page without content in them (see thehelp page).
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theHistory of Japan article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17Auto-archiving period:28 days  |
 | History of Japan was one of thegood articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet thegood article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can berenominated. Editors may also seek areassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status:Delisted good article | |||||||||||||
 | This level-4 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than28 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
There are two paragraphs on Oda Nobunaga and Tokugawa Ieyasu in the Muromachi period section that seem out of place as they discussed people and events of the Azuchi–Momoyama period. They also duplicate the content of that period in relation to the two individuals. I would suggest they be deleted.Nengoro (talk)18:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The values in the last paragraph of Reiwa period seem to be wrong. The paragraph states that Japan aims to increase its defence spending to 2% of GDP, which is calculated as ¥43 trillion ($315 billion). This amount is, according to the sources, the total sum that the Japanese government intends to invest during a five-year period (2023-2027), not a yearly defence expenditure. In my opinion, the wording is misleading.Jogurtik123 (talk)21:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Depending which page I look, I see different years for the ending date of the Jōmon period, leading into Yayoi period. This inset of this page and all other related pages says the date is 1000 BC, but the text of the Jōmon and Yayoi pages say it's 300 BC. The corresponing Japanese pages seem to agree that the date should be 1000BC.Momotaro Ichiban (talk)15:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
