Talk:Hijab
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theHijab article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:Index,1,2,3Auto-archiving period:5 months  |
 | This level-5 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asummary of this article appears inWomen and Islam. |
A) In Surah 24 Verse 31: “And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their chastity, and not to reveal their adornments except what normally appears. Let them draw their Khimars over their chests, and not reveal their ˹hidden˺ adornments except to their husbands, their fathers, their fathers-in-law, their sons……”
People who claim that the Hijab is mandatory for women are assuming that the Khimar in this case means a “headscarf” when in reality the actual definition of a Khimar is a “cloth/cover”.
There's even evidence from an authentic Hadith that supports this claim.
“Narrated Anas Bin Malik: “Abu Talha said to Umm Sulaim: 'I heard the voice of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) sounding weak and I sensed some hunger in it. Do you have anything? She said: 'Yes.' So she got some loaves of wheat bread, then she took out a Khimar of hers, and put the bread in it. Then she put it under my arm, and wrapped my upper body with part of it, and she sent me to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ)." He said: "So I brought it to him, and I found the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) sitting in the Masjid, and there were people with him. So I stood among them, and the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: 'Has Abu Talhah sent you?' I said: 'Yes.' He said: 'With food?' I said: 'Yes.' So the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said to those with him: 'Stand up.'" So they left, and I left in front of them, until I came to Abu Talhah, and I told him (that they were coming). Abu Talhah said: 'O Umm Sulaim! The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) is coming with people, and we don't have anything to feed them.' Umm Sulaim said: 'Allah and His Messenger know best.'" He said: "So Abu Talhah departed until he met up with the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). The Messenger of Allah came, while Abu Talhah was with him, until they entered, when the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: 'Come O Umm Sulaim! What do you have?' So she brought him that bread, and he (ﷺ) ordered that it be broken into pieces. Umm Sulaim poured some butter from an oil-skin upon them, then the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) recited whatever Allah willed for him to say over it. Then he said: 'Let ten come.' So ten were admitted, and they ate until they were full, and then they left. Then he said: 'Let ten come.' So ten were admitted, and they ate until they were full, and they left. Then he said: 'Let ten come.' So ten were admitted, and they ate until they were full, and there were seventy or eighty men."Grade: Sahih (Darussalam) Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3630https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:3630”
Logically speaking, if the Khimar only meant a headscarf, why is Umm Sulaim (RA) wrapping bread in a Khimar?
B) So scholars who claim the Hijab is mandatory cite a supposed historical backstory about how this verse was directed towards women who already wore the headscarf. According to them, “the Quran is assuming that every woman at the time of the revelation of these verses was already covering their hair to begin with, hence it contains a de-facto order for all Muslim women to wear a headscarf “. Hence the only way it would make sense is if EVERY SINGLE Muslim women at that time were wearing a headscarf to begin with, because they are the only women this verse is directed towards.However, it's a well known fact that only the elite and upper class women covered their hair. In fact classical scholars prescribed different awras based on the social status of women, and slave women were prohibited from covering their hair.So what seems more likely, that the Quran is referencing some obscure 7th century custom that only the elite women at that time practiced, for the purpose of establishing a universal injunction on “covering the head”, OR that the command simply means “cover your chest using a piece of cloth”?
C) Looking at images of Muslim women in the periods of the Islamic Golden age (the era shortly after the death of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH when Islamic civilisation flourished), even when free women wore head scarfs on their head, they had bits and strands of hair showing. If hair is actually something women are obligated to cover, these women would have been careful to make sure there's no hair showing.ChickenSoup54 (talk)16:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should change the map of Saudi arabia and Afghanistan; Saudi should be yellow or Orange that it is widespread but no longer mandatory by law and Afghanistan should be red like Iran because it is now mandatory since the Taliban takeover in 2021 and should also be stated they require the Niqab/ BurqaRickyBlair668 (talk)05:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@StarkReport You removed a reference to journal "Violence Against Women" and in revert mentionWP:PARTISAN. I agree that the other reverted reference from "womensmediacenter.com" might not meetWP:Reliable sources. But, I believe returning the journal "Violence Against Women" after rephrasing the sentence is notWP:PARTISAN, do you agree?
Furthermore you claimed in your revert that Hijab article scope "not specific to harassment or controversies", yet the article contains other places mentioning harassment. Section Qur'an: "as a recommendation to meet current needs such as sexual harassment in Medina." And subsection Modern history: "It is seen as a way to avoid harassment and unwanted sexual advances in public". Discussing harassment seems to be within the scope of this article, if not which article do you believe is more relevant for discussing harassment and hijab?HudecEmil (talk)09:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have some doubts as to whether this picture is representative of women who wear hijab. They look highly westernised and anything but 'modest', 'conservative' and 'traditional' in terms of everything besides the hijab itself. It is almost like an advertisement with the message 'Look, it's possible to look cool, youthful, informal, liberated, emancipated, even united in feminist solidarity while still dutifully obeying every single commandment conveyed by the Prophet Muhammad, Messenger of Allah, Peace Be Upon Him'. Really, covering yourhair while having a picture of a face sticking out itstongue on your body? Very modest indeed.62.73.72.3 (talk)16:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, it seems that there is actually hostility against Islam from the way the article was written.109.107.225.228 (talk)07:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
