![]() | This![]() It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it a tonal language? The article should mention this.Badagnani07:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone here has any Herero proficiency, please take a look at this proposal and at the small Herero encyclopedia itself to see what should be done with this wikipedia (keep it or delete it.) Keeping it implies more than a sentimental commitment ("it would be nice to have a wikipedia in every language ...") but also that it can be something more than a 10 or 20-article spam and vandalism trap and not just "someday" but in the here and now.
Please do not respond here but rather at that discussion (meta:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Herero Wikipedia). --A. B.(talk)12:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dothese edits represent nonsense? What is "Wikiherero"?Badagnani09:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This articleis missing information about orthography and phonology. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on thetalk page. |
The internal capitalization in particular is very interesting. --Beland (talk)03:48, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onHerero language. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)12:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]