Talk:Heinkel He 176
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theHeinkel He 176 article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Some of the article content, in particular the test-flight preparations and descriptions, seem to be partial copies or too-close a paraphrasis ofthis non-free content. The tone in the test flight sections is promotional, non-neutral and oddly peacockish. How much of this material is a straight lift from Warsitz' son's book on his father's career? I can't say, as I've no access to a preview ofthis English Edition, but I've an idea it would be worth checking.Haploidavey (talk)15:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, have done a little checking. The questionable content was added in August 2009 byUser:Firstjetpilot, a currently inactive user who could also have authoredthe firstjetpilot website which in turn is copyright of Lutz Warsitz, who also holds author's copyright of his test-pilot father'sbiography. If the wikipedian Firstjetpilot and Lutz Warsitz are one and the same, is this a COI issue, a copyright issue, or a bit of both? And do the website and book count asWP:RS. Or must we lose the lot?Haploidavey (talk)23:43, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:http://www.firstjetpilot.com/history.html (et seq.);http://www.pen-and-sword.co.uk/?product_id=1762. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) Forlegal reasons, we cannot acceptcopyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences orphrases. Accordingly, the materialmay be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the originalorplagiarize from that source. Please see ourguideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.Moonriddengirl(talk)20:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
