This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Military history:South Pacific This article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation:criterion not met Coverage and accuracy:criterion met Structure:criterion met Grammar and style:criterion met Supporting materials:criterion met Associated task forces: /  Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force Australia:Canberra /Military historyLow‑importance Fairbairn, Canberra is within the scope ofWikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofAustralia andAustralia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit theproject page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byWikiProject Canberra (assessed asMid-importance). This article is supported bythe Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed asLow-importance). Need help improving this article?Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at theNational Library of Australia. TheWikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email tohelpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Have feet and metres been mixed up here? IainFastinternet (talk)17:15, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 203.17.154.218

I would be greatful if you could explain your latest set of edits toDefence Establishment Fairbairn. They look a bit like vandalism. Even taken in the best possible light, they contain errors.

Canberra International Airport is a place, not an entity. Places don't own things. It's entities that own things. "Canberra International Airport" do not own the lease; the lease is owned by "Canberra International Airport Pty Ltd".

Similarly, "Canberra International Airport" do not manage or control the Canberra International Airport. It is "Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd" that manage and control the Canberra International Airport.

Similarly, "Canberra International Airport" did not release the "Fairbairn" prospectus. The prospectus was jointly released by Canberra International Airport Pty Ltd and Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd.

Your edit now says "embarked on an ambitious building program in Fairbairn". I'm not aware of any place officially named "Fairbairn". Is there such a place? If so, where is it, and when was it officially named?

You don't seem to like:

"Many of these new buildings have already been leased to the (Australian) Department of Defence (and others), and some are already occupied. By the end of 2007 the new buildings will be completed and occupied."

You've changed that twice now. Can you explain what it is that you don't like about it, and why you keep changing it?

And you have you twice removed the link:National Trust concerns (PDF). Can you explain why you deleted it?

Awaiting, with interest, the receipt of your reply.Pdfpdf04:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notwithstanding the comments above, I have altered the page to address the issues that I'm guessing were upsetting you, without introducing the errors of fact. As you won't communicate, at best this can only be a guess.Pdfpdf10:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onFairbairn, Canberra. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20050615133820/http://www.nationaltrust.org.au/documents/EP2003RCACT-Fairbairn.pdf tohttp://www.nationaltrust.org.au/documents/EP2003RCACT-Fairbairn.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}20:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class military history articles
• C-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
• Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
• C-Class Australia articles
• Low-importance Australia articles
• C-Class Canberra articles
• Mid-importance Canberra articles
• WikiProject Canberra articles
• Low-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
• WikiProject Australia articles

• Military history articles needing attention to referencing and citation
• Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles needing attention to referencing and citation
• Military history articles needing attention only to referencing and citation
• Talk pages with comments before the first section