Talk:Edinburgh Rugby
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Edinburgh Rugby received apeer review by Wikipedia editors, which on April 2008 wasarchived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
|
Image:Edinburgh rugby badge.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot08:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:EdinburghBadge.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot08:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:EdinburghBadge.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot12:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the 06/07 Magners League gone over in such detail here? It's horribly out of date, we're nearly at the end of the 07/08 season for goodness sake!J.R., 14.39, 29 March 2008
As Edinburgh is one of Scotland's only two professional teams I feel it needs to be improved greatly. As a fairly new Wikipedian though I'm a little lost as to where to start. I've therefore submitted it to get a gauge from the more experienced among you on how to improve this. CheersPeemJim86 (talk)22:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FromUser:Shudde
I have a few things that I can list. I'm not going to go into overwhelming detail, rather the broad stuff. If you want more detail do let me know:
at the moment.
That's all I have at the moment. You may want to have a look atCrusaders (rugby) for an FA quality article on a domestic rugby team. It should be able to give you some ideas. If you need any help let me know on my talk page. -Shuddetalk05:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FromUser:MacRusgail (copied from talk page -PeemJim86 (talk)14:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]
I think it's highly questionable that the current team dates back to 1872.--MacRusgail (talk)22:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FromUser:Alistairjh
The results from 2006/07 won't really help in 2008. Also, more pictures would be useful - I'll try and find what I can!Alistairjh or2o-DeMoN-o8 (talk)19:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's highly questionable that the current team dates back to 1872.--MacRusgail (talk)22:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've copied this to the peer review sectionPeemJim86 (talk)14:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BBC Sport Archives seem fairly goodEuropean (Hc and ECC):[1]Celtic (Celtic League):[2]—Precedingunsigned comment added byPeemJim86 (talk •contribs)00:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Might want to update them for 2008?2o-DeMoN-o8 (talk)19:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC) (Copied to PR page by User)[reply]
The article currently include details of Magner's League Fixtures, Results and Table. The details currently given are out-of-date (they are for 2008/09) and will need continually updating after every match, and at the end of each season. Accurate and up-to-date details are available on the Magner's League website so. I propose that, rather than persist with a page of outdated information, the results and table be removed and a link to the Magner's website be left in their place. (Although the ideal situtation would obviously be for to do the updates after each round of fixtures, this isn't happening now and I think it unlikely that it will happen reliably in the future.)
Alternatively, the article could have the results and table from the lastcomplete season - updated on this page at the end of that season.
Any thoughts? (The same would apply to the Heineken Cup fixtures and group tables)
I would take away the fixtures and table altogether, and just leave a link to the article on the current Magners League or Heineken Cup seasons. (talk)07:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Karmstro (talk)10:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As there were no dissenting voices, I have removed the old tables. Links for Heineken and Magners are at the foot of the page.Karmstro (talk)14:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onEdinburgh Rugby. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online22:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
