This article iswritten inBritish English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,defence,artefact,analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus.
East India Company is aformer featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, checkthe nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofAfrica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofBangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofBritish Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject ofHistory on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcompanies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofEconomics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving allHong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited tojoin this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofIndia-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit theproject page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related toSingapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofSri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofTrade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theUnited Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
It's hard to think of company that has created so much misery and death over so many centuries, across its drug running, colonialism and slavery. And, yes, it's still proudly trading. Its current strapline is"400 Years Of Cultural Impact". Unbelievable. It's worth the article noting that the masters of destruction did not see fit to slink off under a rock of their own shame but still sell tea.Anna (talk)21:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense. The company you are referring to is a new company that has chosen to use the same name as the original company. Other than that, there is no connection between the two companies.Acad Ronin (talk)22:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Only changing the title as there were other companies too. As British one was most significant, the page will redirect to the British one.Prinaki (talk)15:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
EIC rule did not happen over night. It took nearly a century starting from the victory in Battle of Plassey, and then in historical important wars such as the Carnatic Wars, Anglo-Maratha Wars & Anglo-Sikh wars. To state that EIc established rule across the vast landscape at the end of Battle of Plassey is inaccurateKumarbala82 (talk)21:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A well presented historical sequence from University of Maryland
East India Company is about the trading company. For the rule, please seeCompany rule in India. The sentence, "Company rule in India effectively began in 1757 after theBattle of Plassey," doesn't mean that the Company had annexed, controlled, or subduedall of India with the victory at Plassey, or immediately after, but only that for all practical purpose, the Company first began to rule asubstantial tract of land in India, especially rural India, after its victory at Plassey. In other words, it had moved beyond controlling threePresidency towns on the coast and some small regions nearby.Fowler&fowler«Talk»00:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To an uninformed reader, they will not be able to make that distinction. This statement is too simplistic and reduces what is a complex transfer of power that took nearly a century.
This statement needs to be replaced with what you have described - i.e. the sequence.
Battle of Plassey is a small but significant victory for the British. But the more seminal events are the Carnatic Wars, Anglo-Maratha Wars & Anglo-Sikh Wars.Kumarbala82 (talk)04:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Let me think about this some more. I don't think we should mention the notable subsequent wars or treaties after Plassey inthis page's lead, but we can say something more general in the sentence that mentions Plassey andCompany rule in India. Best regards,Fowler&fowler«Talk»04:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Thank you.
I was thinking a brief mention in the page's lead.
Then potentially a larger dedicated section that talks about transfer of power in detail?
Hello, I was wondering if you had a chance to think about this? It will be great to add more details so it doesnt provide a wrong or one-sided view of history. ThanksKumarbala82 (talk)09:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't be. If you would like to chat about it at some-point, let me know. There are couple of more academics who are interested in this topic as well.Kumarbala82 (talk)11:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I do think there is a problem here. In my experience South Asian readers do tend to think EIC/British rule in particular places began much earlier than it did - theHistory of Pakistan article used to be like this, with paragraphs on 18th-century EIC expansion in Bengal. Perhaps instead of the current:
"Company rule in India effectively began in 1757 after the Battle of Plassey and lasted until 1858." we might go to something like:
"Company ruled areas in India gradually expanded after the Battle of Plassey in 1757 and by 1858 covered most of India and modern Pakistan"
Thanks @Johnbod That reads nicely. May be add a sentences of milestones or critical events like the Carnatic Wars, Polygar Wars, Anglo-Maratha Wars, Anglo-Sikh Wars & Ahom wars.Kumarbala82 (talk)15:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to agree with F&F that we don't need a list in the lead. Maybe a link, or add "after a series of wars" (linked somewhere) after 1858.Johnbod (talk)15:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you guys (meant gender neutrally) come up with something and add it to the article? This is not an article I edit much these days (though I did play a role in changing its name to the current one). Thanks.Fowler&fowler«Talk»13:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PS i.e. something short and sweet, not more than two sentences, I'd say. Basically, it should be passing the buck, in succinct prose and not lists (as Jb suggests), of different aspects of the Company's gradually expanding rule in South Asia to other pages.
How do we word this? From an Indian perspective, Carnatic Wars and Anglo-Maratha Wars are far more significant - as it took Britain a lot of time and effort to win compared to the relatively insignificant Battle of Plassey - thought symbolic from a British perspective.
it's important to acknowledge the complexity of this historical process. The assertion that the EIC established rule across India immediately after the Battle of Plassey is not entirely accurate. The Company's rule indeed began with Plassey, but it was a gradual expansion that took nearly a century to encompass a substantial part of India.
The University of Maryland's historical sequence provides a more comprehensive perspective on the consolidation of British rule in India between 1780 and 1820. It's essential to distinguish between the Company's initial control and the broader span of its rule over time.
While it's true that the Battle of Plassey holds significance, other events like the Carnatic Wars, Anglo-Maratha Wars, and Anglo-Sikh Wars played pivotal roles in shaping the Company's rule. Finding a balanced way to represent these perspectives in the article, perhaps with a brief mention in the lead followed by a dedicated section, could provide a more nuanced understanding of this historical process.
Ultimately, presenting the historical facts accurately and comprehensively is crucial to avoid a simplistic or one-sided view of history. Collaboration among contributors to the article can help achieve this goal.207.96.13.213 (talk)19:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, can we add a separate section below that explains the timeline and major conflicts resulting in the establishing of crown rule in 1857?Kumarbala82 (talk)16:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is quite telling of the British that the default named East India Company would be that of the English, despite the fact that there were several other contemporaries of the same name in history.Stevenmitchell (talk)11:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's a section on this above. The English and Dutch were by far the biggest, & the Dutch (TheUnited East India Company (Dutch:Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie) is almost always called the "VOC" in sources, both in English and Dutch. So not very "telling", nor "Pretentious". Needless to say, neither used their nationality in their actual names.Johnbod (talk)15:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I respectfully disagree as there is no VOC main page aside disambiguation and using that arguement to default EIC to British is by definition anglocentric. The Dutch EIC was literally the largest company in human history and should be default.2603:6010:C100:827B:6CFC:D31E:ABE8:5041 (talk)13:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from this user should be excluded from assessments ofconsensus.
Some time ago, there was information about the famines the EIC caused, how they seized control and looted the Indian subcontinent etc. Why was that removed?-Haani40 (talk)14:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between16 January 2024 and4 May 2024. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Bacchanaliaxd (article contribs).
I agree with Commander Keane; initially it appears that the title could be wrong, but when you think a bit more about it, this is likely the best title for the page. The next best known is probably the Dutch Company, which is almost always referred to by its (Dutch) initials, VOC, and i can't think of another which could possibly be confused with this. Thus, this is the simplest way to refer to it. If you look atthis page about titles, you will find thatWikipedia...generally prefers the name that is most commonly used..., and that would be "East India Company". Hope these responses help. ~LindsayHello11:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article on the VOC has a very detailed section about criticism of the Dutch India company, outlining in great detail some of the most serious colonialist crimes it committed. No such thing added here. Are we trying to protect fragile British patriotic memories or something?94.155.21.101 (talk)19:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No criticism? I don't think so. But the two companies followed very different strategies, in very different contexts. It helps that the alternative home-grown Indian polities were so unstable and of so little benefit to those they ruled.Johnbod (talk)05:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between16 January 2024 and4 May 2024. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Bacchanaliaxd (article contribs).
