This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

GeologyLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-usegeology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit theproject page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

On 9 February 2012Pseudofusulina removed theQuaternary template, indicating that "a period is divided into epochs and stages, it's an eratherm that's dividied into systems, series, stages, in spite of the wikipedia article to the contrary - and you can't reference it if it's wrong.

I have restored the template because it is useful. Maybe I don't understandPseudofusulina's point, did he meanepochs and ages? If there is a problem with the template, particularly the note at the bottom, would it not be better to discuss that on thetemplate talk page and to fix the template? --Bejnar (talk)06:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would really rank the Early Pleistocene as of upper mid level of importance rather than low. Obviously the current state of this stub is not emblematic of its importance, but see the articles on theGelasian and theCalabrian ages for a fuller view. --Bejnar (talk)06:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class Geology articles
• Low-importance Geology articles
• Low-importance Start-Class Geology articles
• WikiProject Geology articles