Talk:Christian right
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has beendesignated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related toabortion, which has beendesignated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has beendesignated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theChristian right article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6Auto-archiving period:30 days  |
 | This article iswritten inAmerican English, which has its own spelling conventions (color,defense,traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives | ||||||
| ||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than30 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)15:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)12:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this should just be "Associated political parties."
To the extent that all these parties are minor, this seems like a pretty pointless section.
Moreover, some of these parties are not minor--for example, the list includes the PolishLaw and Justice party, which is the dominant party in Polish politics (largest bloc in the Sejm and Senate, and the party of the current president and prime minister).69.30.188.35 (talk)06:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
One paragraph here ends with the claim, "Beginning around thepresidency of Donald Trump, Christian conservatives have largely refrained from engaging in debates about sexual morality." This links to an article from 2018 stating that Christian conservatives had largely seemed to have given up on overturning gay marriage. However, by this point five years later, it seems abundantly clear that after Trump's loss in 2000, Christian conservatives pivoted strongly back towards an anti-homosexuality message, particularly aimed at transgender people. The number of prominent figures who have engaged in "groomer" rhetoric and who have assisted in passing laws targeting the rights of trans people in multiple states certainly seems to indicate that this sentence no longer holds true and that sexuality is once again a major, if not the central, plank of the religious right's campaigning in the US.2601:840:4480:30:11F2:3A82:AEF:E6C0 (talk)12:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
