Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Boeing C-40 Clipper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theBoeing C-40 Clipper article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMilitary history:Aviation /North America /United StatesStart‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
StartThis article has been rated asStart-class on the project'squality scale.
B checklist
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation:criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy:criterion not met
  3. Structure:criterion met
  4. Grammar and style:criterion met
  5. Supporting materials:criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Military aviation task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
WikiProject iconAviation:Aircraft
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of theAviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists ofopen tasks andtask forces. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
B checklist
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation:criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy:criterion not met
  3. Structure:criterion met
  4. Grammar and style:criterion met
  5. Supporting materials:criterion met
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe aircraft project.

Relation to Air force one article

[edit]

I believe that this article is somewhat related to the Air force one article so i have created a link from there to here and added picture of the nicknamedairforce three C-40B courtesy of USAF (Public domain).--Jsimeon75 19 Mar 2006

Payload data

[edit]

The payload data given is for the US Navy's C-40A. The USAF has their C-40B/C configured for VIP transport so there is no cabin cargo capacity, and less passengers are carried. The C-40B/C also has a greater fuel capacity for longer range. The CFM56 engines used have been derated to 24,000 pounds of thrust.—The precedingunsigned comment was added by68.112.4.233 (talk •contribs) 00:13, December 18, 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that is true. In many articles about aircraft in wikipedia, there may be many variant of that aircraft, all having different specs. In most cases, only one variant has the specs listed. In some cases, this is the most common variant, or perhaps it may be the only variant that has publicly available sources, or it just may be the one that the author picked to include here. I have changed the header to make clear the specs where about the "A" model.

Merger

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No contest. Consensus onTalk:C-40A Clipper was also to merge. -BillCJ (talk)02:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree- This is basically a small page split from a bigger page. Kevin Rutherford 01:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Concur. I am closing the discussion, and will merge shortly. I don't know how I missed this one, but it shouldn't have been created in the first place. Was done in apparent good faith tho. -BillCJ (talk)02:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onBoeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

checkYAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online05:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. (a bit late)Redalert2fan (talk)19:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unit listings

[edit]

wondering why bilcat takes it upon himself to revert properly formatted and referenced unit listings, there is no stated format specifying only squadrons; there are numerous aircraft articles on wiki that include parent units and home bases. Yet another example of how some editors misuse their power.Bob80q (talk)14:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links onBoeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)08:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links onBoeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)22:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onBoeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)06:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unit Listings

[edit]

updated the section on "Operators" to include better references and addition of USMC unit but someone continues to revert it. Any explanation?2601:149:8100:B951:9963:681A:552A:73A3 (talk)02:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bob80q, you aren't allowed to edit Wikipedia, as you've been blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts and IPs, just like you're doing right now. -BilCat (talk)05:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
don't know who that person is, editing and writing without logging in is allowed per wiki rules. Lame excuse for reverting an appropriate edit of course you have a long history of doing so and your reversion of appropriate posts and additions constitutes edit warring.— Precedingunsigned comment added by2601:149:8100:B951:9963:681A:552A:73A3 (talk)20:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please Bob, you're not fooling anyone. You edit the same types of articles as you did before you were blocked, with the same styles, among other things. Reverting socks is clearly not vandalism. -BilCat (talk)21:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boeing_C-40_Clipper&oldid=1200226430"
Categories:
Hidden categories:
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp