![]() | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Admittedly I missed that specific issue but care should be taken in declaring something not canon over the Joker's origin story. As I recall, the Joker himself has said that he enjoys making up differing origins for himself and at least once, declaring that he has a hard time remembering which one is true.Lots42 (talk)16:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing....since Superman Confidential, followed by Superman:Secret Origins is supposed to be the new Superman canon, you can pretty much guess the same thing with Batman Confidential.—Precedingunsigned comment added by24.17.118.100 (talk)11:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given atWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contactthe Comics WikiProject.Comics-awb (talk)15:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visitWikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article.HidingT14:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is a possibility that this is either a tip-of-the-hat to or a retelling of "Joker:Devil's Advocate."—Precedingunsigned comment added by24.17.118.100 (talk)09:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the new canon, doesn't it trump the continuity of Ledgends of the Dark Knight?—Precedingunsigned comment added by24.17.118.100 (talk)04:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]