Talk:Albino Farm
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can someone come up with a better summary of the plot? It's just not making any sense.Jedikaiti (talk)02:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just pasted a review I found herehttp://www.viewclips.net/albino-farm-2009/
I saw this movie last year, but I'm not very good at writing synopsis. but i suppose this is better than that broken-english synopsis that was before. I hope somebody will try to fix it into a more accurate less "from the back of the DVD" synopsis. ^^ sorry for the inconviniences.--189.173.97.174 (talk)01:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Who made this article? It should really be reviewed and modified.I'm checking them references and number six is just a commentary from somebody who saw the movie. It has no reference as to the movie being a true story.reference number five isn't even needed, since number four already states both directors; reference seven is a dead link, and from there on to 17 are either dead or from the same site. I think 18 is fine, 19 is dead, 20 is in german, 21 is fine I think, 22 is fine too, 23 is fine, 24 is dead, and 25 has no reference to "Redneck Slasher". Sorry again for bothering.--189.173.97.174 (talk)01:25, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article's lead section and production section are way too short and need to be expanded. The article is also missing important information on the film's reception which needs to be added to the article, with reviews from notable critics added in a reception section. All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk)16:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The production section is way too short and needs to be expanded. There are some references already established in the article that could have its information added or moved to this section. These references that contain more information on the film's production are found in the cast section and should be used in the production section rather than its current placement. The plot is also way too long, taking up most of the article. It needs to be trimmed with more detailed portions reworded so that it's shorter or otherwise removed. More information on the article, including information on the film's production and reception, needs to be added in order to balance the article.--Paleface Jack (talk)15:45, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
