Movatterモバイル変換

Talk:9th century BC

Page contents not supported in other languages.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to the9th century BC article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

This article is ratedList-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

ListsLow‑importance

	This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize alllist pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

TimeLow‑importance

	This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofTime on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
Low	This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

YearsLow‑importance

	This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofYears on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

HistoryLow‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope ofWikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject ofHistory on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

i think adena date is incorrect, see article and information in other wikis --83.60.66.69 (talk)11:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]