Stigler's law of eponymy, proposed byUniversity of Chicagostatistics professorStephen Stigler in his 1980 publication "Stigler's law ofeponymy",[1] states that "no scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." Examples includeHubble's law, which was derived byGeorges Lemaître two years beforeEdwin Hubble; thePythagorean theorem, whichwas known toBabylonian mathematicians before Pythagoras; andHalley's Comet, which was observed by astronomers since at least 240 BC (although its official designation is due to the first evermathematical prediction of such astronomical phenomenon in the sky, not to its discovery).
Stigler attributed the discovery of Stigler's law tosociologistRobert K. Merton, from whom Stigler stole credit so that it would be an example of the law. The same observation had previously also been made by many others.[2]
Historical acclaim for discoveries is often assigned to persons of note who bring attention to an idea that is not yet widely known, whether or not that person was its original inventor – theories may be named long after their discovery. In the case ofeponymy, the idea becomes named after that person, even if that person is acknowledged byhistorians of science not to be the one who discovered it. Often, several people willarrive at a new idea around the same time, as in the case ofcalculus. It can be dependent on the publicity of the new work and the fame of its publisher as to whether the scientist's name becomes historically associated.
There is a similar quote attributed toMark Twain:
It takes a thousand men to invent a telegraph, or a steam engine, or a phonograph, or a photograph, or a telephone or any other important thing—and the last man gets the credit and we forget the others. He added his little mite—that is all he did. These object lessons should teach us that ninety-nine parts of all things that proceed from the intellect are plagiarisms, pure and simple; and the lesson ought to make us modest. But nothing can do that.[3]
Stephen Stigler's father, the economistGeorge Stigler, also examined the process of discovery ineconomics. He said, "If an earlier, valid statement of a theory falls on deaf ears, and a later restatement is accepted by the science, this is surely proof that the science accepts ideas only when they fit into the then-current state of the science." He gave several examples in which the original discoverer was not recognized as such.[4] Similar arguments were made in regards to accepted ideas relative to the state of science by Thomas Kuhn inThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions.[5]
TheMatthew effect was coined by Robert K. Merton to describe how eminent scientists get more credit than a comparatively unknown researcher, even if their work is similar, so that credit will usually be given to researchers who are already famous. Merton notes:
This pattern of recognition, skewed in favor of the established scientist, appears principally
(i) in cases of collaboration and
(ii) in cases of independent multiple discoveries made by scientists of distinctly different rank.[6]
The effect applies specifically to women through theMatilda effect.
Boyer's law was named byHubert Kennedy in 1972. It says, "Mathematical formulas and theorems are usually not named after their original discoverers" and was named afterCarl Boyer, whose bookA History of Mathematics contains many examples of this law. Kennedy observed that "it is perhaps interesting to note that this is probably a rare instance of a law whose statement confirms its own validity".[7]
"Everything of importance has been said before by somebody who did not discover it" is anadage attributed toAlfred North Whitehead.[8]