 | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
 | |
| Geographical range | Ukraine, Russia |
|---|---|
| Period | Chalcolithic Europe |
| Dates | mid 5th – mid 4th mill. BCE[1] |
| Preceded by | Dnieper-Donets culture,Mariupol culture |
| Followed by | Cernavodă culture,Repin culture,Suvorovo culture,Novodanilovka group,Yamnaya culture |
| Part ofa series on |
| Indo-European topics |
|---|
 |
Extant Extinct Reconstructed Hypothetical
Grammar Other |
Archaeology Chalcolithic (Copper Age) Pontic Steppe Caucasus East Asia Eastern Europe Northern Europe Bronze Age Northern/Eastern Steppe Europe
South Asia Iron Age Europe Caucasus Central Asia India |
Peoples and societies Bronze Age Iron AgeIndo-Aryans Iranians Nuristanis East Asia Europe Middle Ages Europe Indo-Aryan Iranian |
Religion and mythology |
 Category |
TheSredny Stog culture (Russian:Среднесто́говская культу́ра,romanized: Srednestogovskaja kul'tura,Ukrainian:Середньостогівська культура,romanized: Serednʹostohivsʹka kulʹtura) orSerednii Stih culture[2][3] is a pre-Kurgan archaeological culture from the mid. 5th – mid. 4th millennia BC. It is named after theDnieper river islet of today'sSerednii Stih (Ukrainian:Середній Стіг;Russian:Средний Стог,romanized: Sredny Stog),Ukraine, where it was first located.[4]
Culture features appear across a wide territory in theBlack Sea steppe from theDnipro River, the upperDonets River, the lowerDon region, and theSea of Azov in the east to the delta of theDanube River in the west.[1]
It seems to have had contact with the agriculturalCucuteni–Trypillian culture in the west, centered in modern-dayMoldova,[5][6] Romania and Ukraine,[7] and was a contemporary of theKhvalynsk culture in the north-east, located in the middleVolga region.[8]
One of the sites most associated with this culture isDeriivka (Ukrainian: Деріївка,Russian: Дериевка), located on the right bank of the Omelnik, a tributary of theDnieper, and is the largest site within the Sredny Stog culture complex, being about 2,000 square metres (22,000 sq ft) in area. The Eneolithic part of the Deriivka archaeological complex includes a settlement and a cemetery. Other Sredny Stog sites include Igren-8 and Moliukhiv Buhor (Ukrainian:Молюхів Бугор,Russian:Молюхов Бугор,romanized:Molyukhov Bugor) on the Dnieper River, as well as Oleksandriia (Ukrainian:Олександрія,Russian:Александрия,romanized:Aleksandriya) on theOskil River in east Ukraine.
The Sredny Stog people lived rather mobile lives. This was seen in their temporary settlements, particularly their dwellings, which were simple rectilinear structures.[9]
Dmytro Telegin has divided the chronology of Sredny Stog into two distinct phases.[4]Phase I (middle 4th millennium BC, according to Telegin) included Sredny Stog complexes of the Strilcha Skelia-Sredny Stog II type that contained pottery without the corded ornament.Phase II (according to Telegin, middle 3rd millennium BC) is represented by the Sredny Stog complexes of the Deriivka-Moliukhovyi Buhor type that usedcorded ware pottery which may have originated there, and stone battle-axes of the type later associated with expanding Indo-European cultures to the West. Most notably, it has perhaps the earliest evidence ofhorse domestication, with finds suggestive of cheek-pieces (psalia). However, there is no conclusive proof that those horses were used for riding since they were mainly employed for gathering food.[10] Sredny Stog periodization and chronology have undergone a revision in recent years.
Mobile steppe communities of the Sredny Stog archaeological complex likely emerged from the Azov-Dnipro-Donets area in the first half of the 5th millennium BCE.[3]
In its three largest cemeteries, Oleksandriia (39 individuals), Igren (17) and Deriivka II (14), evidence ofburial in flat graves (ground level pits) has been found.[11][12] This parallels the practice of theCucuteni-Trypillia culture, and is in contrast with the laterYamnaya culture, which practicedtumuli burials.
In Sredny Stog culture, the deceased were laid to rest on their backs with the legs flexed. The use ofochre in the burial was practiced, as with thekurgan cultures. For this and other reasons,Yuri Rassamakin suggests that the Sredny Stog culture should be considered as a real term, with at least four distinct cultural elements co-existing inside the same geographical area.
In the context of the modifiedKurgan hypothesis ofMarija Gimbutas, this pre-kurgan archaeological culture could represent theUrheimat (homeland) of theProto-Indo-European language which others associate with the laterYamnaya culture.
It has been theorized thatCernavodă culture, together with the Sredny Stog culture, was the source ofAnatolian languages and introduced them to Anatolia through the Balkans after Anatolian split from the Archaic-Proto-Indo-European language, which some linguists and archaeologists place in the area of the Sredny Stog culture.[13][14][15] Other studies have suggested that the Indo-European language family may have originated not in Eastern Europe, but among West Asian populations south of the Caucasus.[16]
Guus Kroonen et al. 2022 found that the "basal Indo-European stage", also known asIndo-Anatolian or Archaic-Proto-Indo-European language, largely but not totally, lacked agricultural-related vocabulary, and only the later "coreIndo-European languages" saw an increase in agriculture-associated words. According to them, this fits a homeland of early core Indo-European within the westernmost Yamnaya horizon, around and west of theDnieper, while its basal stage, Indo-Anatolian, may have originated in the Sredny Stog culture, as opposed to the eastern Yamnaya horizon. They also argue that this new data contradicts a possible earlier origin of Archaic-PIE among agricultural societies South of the Caucasus, rather "this may support a scenario of linguistic continuity of local non-mobile herders in the Lower Dnieper region and their genetic persistence after their integration into the successive and expansive Yamnaya horizon". Furthermore the authors mention that this scenario can explain the difference in paternal haplogroup frequency between the Yamnaya and Corded Ware cultures, while both sharing similar autosomal DNA ancestry.[17]
Examination of physical remains of the Sredny Stog people has determined that they wereEuropoid. A similar physical type prevails among theYamnaya, who were tall and powerfully built. People of the neighboringKhvalynsk culture were less powerfully built.[a] People of the precedingDnieper–Donets culture were even more powerfully built than the Sredny Stog andYamnaya.[19]
Sredny Stog culture individuals had highly variable genetic ancestry.[3][20] Lazaridis et al. (2024) identified the 'Dnipro' Eneolithic genetic cline, involving populations with both Caucasus Neolithic and Lower Volga ancestry. As these populations moved westward and acquired Ukraine Neolithic hunter-gatherer (UNHG) ancestry, they formed the Sredny Stog culture.[20]
Mathieson et al. (2018) included a genetic analysis of a male buried at Olexandria (Ukraine) and dated to 4153-3970 calBC,[21] ascribed to the Sredny Stog culture.[22] He was found to be carrying the paternalhaplogroup R1a1a1, and the maternal haplogroupH2a1a.[21] He carried about 80%Western Steppe Herder (WSH) ancestry and about 20%Early European Farmer (EEF) ancestry.[22] This Sredny Stog male was thought to be the first steppe individual found to have been carrying EEF ancestry. As a carrier of the13910 allele, he was supposed to be the earliest individual ever examined who has had a genetic adaptation tolactase persistence.[23] However, the recent publication byDavid Reich Lab, October 2021, presented another date from a different sample of the same individual, 2134–1950 cal BC,[24] which could actually belong toSrubnaya culture period, as Haplotree Information Project considers this sample I6561 is from around 3650 ybp (c. 1700 BC), and belongs to Y-DNA R1a-F2597*, corresponding to R1a-Y3.[25] The WSH genetic cluster was a result of mixing betweenEastern Hunter-Gatherers (EHGs) from Eastern Europe andCaucasus hunter-gatherers (CHGs). This mixing appears to have happened on the easternPontic–Caspian steppe starting around 5,000 BC.[22]
Matilla et al. (2023) presented whole-genome analysis of a Sredny Stog individual, dated to 4320-4052 calBC, from the Deriivka II archaeological site in the Middle Dnieper Valley.[26] The authors conclude that a third of the genetic ancestry of the individual was derived from the local Neolithic Dnieper Valley ancestry, while the rest was of the Yamnaya-related steppe ancestry.
Another Eneolithic individual (4049-3945 calBC) carrying steppe ancestry, potentially from a Sredny Stog population, was identified at the Trypillian settlement of Kolomyitsiv Yar Tract (KYT) near Obykhiv in central Ukraine.[2] At the whole genome level, the KYT individual was close to the Yamnaya from Ukraine and Russia, without forming a clade with Yamnaya. The authors suggested that genetic ancestry of the KYT individual was plausibly derived from a proto-Yamnaya population, with admixture fromIron Gates Mesolithic.
The steppe ancestry, otherwise known asWestern Steppe Herder WSH ancestry, found in the Sredny Stog culture is similar to that of theKhvalynsk culture, among whom there was no EEF admixture. Males of the Khvalynsk culture carried primarily the paternalhaplogroup R1b, although a few samples of R1a,I2a2,Q1a andJ have been detected. Succeeding Yamnaya males however, have been found to have carried only R1b andI2. This is similar to the males of the earlier Dnieper-Donets culture, who carriedR andI only and were almost exclusively EHGs withWestern Hunter-Gatherer (WHG) admixture. The results suggest, as a possible yet highly simplified scenario, that the Yamnaya emerged through mixing between EHG and WHG males, and EEF and CHG females. This implies that the leading clans of the Yamnaya were of EHG paternal origin.[23] On this basis,David W. Anthony argues that theIndo-European languages were originally spoken by EHGs.[27] Another hypothesis about the origin of the Indo-European (IE) languages links them with the Eneolithic circum-Pontic trade network and suggests the emergence of the ancestral IE tongue in the North Pontic steppe.[28]
Recent genetic research found the Yamnaya to be a result of admixture between EHGs, CHGs, Anatolian Neolithic farmers and Levantine Neolithic farmers, with the mixture happening between an EHG + CHG population (Sredny Stog-like) and a CHG-like (CHG + Anatolia Neolithic + Levant Neolithic) population with the admixture occurring around 4000BCE.[29][30][31]
The culture ended at around 3500 BC, when theYamnaya culture expanded westward replacing Sredny Stog, and coming into direct contact with theCucuteni–Trypillia culture culture in westernUkraine.
{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)