TheParty of Socialist-Revolutionaries (theSRs,СР, orEsers,эсеры,esery;Russian:Па́ртия социали́стов-революционе́ров,romanized: Pártiya sotsialístov-revolyutsionérov,[a]ПСР,PSR), also known as theSocialist Revolutionary Party, was a majorpolitical party in the lateRussian Empire, during both phases of theRussian Revolution, and in earlySoviet Russia.
By November 1917, the Provisional Government had been widely discredited by its failure to withdraw fromWorld War I, implementland reform or convene aConstituent Assembly to draft a Constitution, leaving thesoviet councils inde facto control of the country. The Bolsheviks thus moved to hand power to the 2nd Congress of Soviets in theOctober Revolution. After a few weeks of deliberation, the Left SRs ultimately formed acoalition government with the Bolsheviks – the Council of People's Commissioners – from November 1917 to March 1918 while the Right SRs boycotted the Soviets and denounced the Revolution as an illegalcoup. The SRs obtained a majority in the subsequentelections to theRussian Constituent Assembly. Citing outdated voter-rolls which did not acknowledge the party split, and the Assembly's conflicts with the Congress of Soviets, the Bolshevik-Left SR government moved to dissolve the Constituent Assembly by force in January 1918.[6]
The SRs supported theWhites during theRussian Civil War of 1917–1922, but the White movement'santi-socialist leadership increasingly marginalized and ultimately purged them. A small SR remnant continued to operate in exile from 1923 to 1940 as a member of theLabour and Socialist International.
The party's ideology was built upon the philosophical foundation of Russia'sNarodnik–populist movement of the 1860s–1870s and its worldview developed primarily byAlexander Herzen andPyotr Lavrov. After a period of decline and marginalisation in the 1880s, the Narodnik–populist school of thought about social change in Russia was revived and substantially modified by a group of writers and activists known asneonarodniki (neo-populists), particularlyViktor Chernov. Their main innovation was a renewed dialogue with Marxism and integration of some of the key Marxist concepts into their thinking and practice. In this way, with the economic spurt and industrialisation in Russia in the 1890s, they attempted to broaden their appeal in order to attract the rapidly growing urban workforce to their traditionally peasant-oriented programme. The intention was to widen the concept of the people so that it encompassed all elements in society that opposed theTsarist regime.
The party was established in 1902 out of the Northern Union of Socialist Revolutionaries (founded in 1896), bringing together many local socialist revolutionary groups established in the 1890s, notably the Workers' Party of Political Liberation of Russia created byCatherine Breshkovsky andGrigory Gershuni in 1899. A primary party theorist emergedViktor Chernov, the editor of the first party organ,Revolutsionnaya Rossiya (Revolutionary Russia). Later party periodicals includedZnamia Truda (Labour's Banner),Delo Naroda (People's Cause) andVolia Naroda (People's Will). Party leaders included Grigori Gershuni, Catherine Breshkovsky,Andrei Argunov,Nikolai Avksentiev,Mikhail Gots,Mark Natanson, Rakitnikov (Maksimov),Vadim Rudnev,Nikolay Rusanov,Ilya Rubanovich andBoris Savinkov.
The party's programme wasdemocratic andsocialist – it garnered much support among Russia's ruralpeasantry, who in particular supported their programme of land-socialization as opposed to the Bolshevik programme of land-nationalization – division of land into peasant tenants rather than collectivization into state management. The party's policy platform differed from that of theRussian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) – bothBolshevik andMenshevik – in that it was not officiallyMarxist (though some of its ideologues considered themselves such). The SRs agreed with Marx's analysis of capitalism, but not with his proposed solution. The SRs believed that both the labouring peasantry as well as the industrial proletariat were revolutionary classes in Russia. Whereas RSDLP defined class membership in terms of ownership of the means of production, Chernov and other SR theorists defined class membership in terms of extraction of surplus value from labour. On the first definition, small-holding subsistence farmers who do not employ wage labour are – as owners of their land – members of the petty bourgeoisie, whereas on the second definition, they can be grouped with all who provide rather than purchase labour-power, and hence with the proletariat as part of the labouring class. Chernov considered the proletariat as vanguard and the peasantry as the main body of the revolutionary army.[7]
Kampf un kempfer, aYiddish pamphlet published by the SRs exile branch inLondon, 1904
The party played an active role in the1905 Russian Revolution and in theMoscow andSaint Petersburg Soviets. Although the party officially boycotted the firstState Duma in 1906, 34 SRs were elected while 37 were elected to the second Duma in 1907. The party also boycotted both the third Duma (1907–1912) and fourth Duma (1912–1917). In this period, party membership drastically declined and most of its leaders emigrated from Russia.
A distinctive feature of party tactics until about 1909 was its heavy reliance on assassinations of individual government officials. These tactics were inherited from SRs' predecessor in the populist movement,Narodnaya Volya (“People's Will”), a conspiratorial organisation of the 1880s. They were intended to embolden the "masses" and intimidate ("terrorise") the Tsarist government intopolitical concessions. TheSR Combat Organisation (SRCO), responsible for assassinating government officials, was initially led by Gershuni and operated separately from the party so as not to jeopardise its political actions. SRCO agents assassinated two Ministers of the Interior,Dmitry Sipyagin andVyacheslav von Plehve,Grand Duke Sergei Aleksandrovich, the Governor of Ufa N. M. Bogdanovich and many other high-ranking officials.
In 1903, Gershuni was betrayed by his deputy,Yevno Azef, an agent of theOkhrana secret police, arrested, convicted of terrorism and sentenced to life at hard labour, managing to escape, flee overseas and go into exile. Azef became the new leader of the SRCO and continued working for both the SRCO and the Okhrana, simultaneously orchestrating terrorist acts and betraying his comrades. Boris Savinkov ran many of the actual operations, notably the assassination attempt on AdmiralFyodor Dubasov.
However, terrorism was controversial for the party from the beginning. At its 2nd Congress inImatra in 1906, the controversy over terrorism was one of the main reasons for the split between theSR Maximalists and thePopular Socialists. The Maximalists endorsed not only attacks on political and government targets, but also economic terror (i.e. attacks on landowners, factory owners and so on) whereas the Popular Socialists rejected all terrorism. Other issues also divided the defectors from the PSR as Maximalists disagreed with the SRs' strategy of a two-stage revolution as advocated by Chernov, the first stage being popular-democratic and the second labour-socialist. To Maximalists, this seemed like the RSDLP distinction between bourgeois-democratic and proletarian-socialist stages of revolution. Maximalism stood for immediate socialist revolution. Meanwhile, the Popular Socialists disagreed with the party's proposal to socialise the land (i.e. turn it over to collective peasant ownership) and instead wanted to nationalise it (i.e. turn it over to the state). They also wanted landowners to be compensated while the PSR rejected indemnities. Many SRs held a mixture of these positions.
In late 1908, a Russian Narodnik and amateur spy hunterVladimir Burtsev suggested that Azef might be a police spy. The party's Central Committee was outraged and set up a tribunal to try Burtsev for slander. At the trial, Azef was confronted with evidence and was caught lying, therefore he fled and left the party in disarray. The party's Central Committee, most of whose members had close ties to Azef, felt obliged to resign. Many regional organisations, already weakened by the revolution's defeat in 1907, collapsed or became inactive. Savinkov's attempt to rebuild the SRCO failed and it was suspended in 1911. Gershuni had defended Azef from exile in Zürich until his death there. The Azef scandal contributed to a profound revision of SR tactics that was already underway. As a result, it renounced assassinations ("individual terror") as a means of political protest.
With the start ofWorld War I, the party was divided on the issue of Russia's participation in the war. Most SR activists and leaders, particularly those remaining in Russia, chose to support the Tsarist government mobilisation against Germany. Together with the like-minded members of the Menshevik Party, they became known asoborontsy ("defensists"). Many younger defensists living in exile joined the French Army as Russia's closest ally in the war. A smaller group, the internationalists, which included Chernov, favoured the pursuit of peace through cooperation with socialist parties in both military blocs. This led them to participate in theZimmerwald andKienthal conferences with Bolshevik emigres led by Lenin. This fact was later used against Chernov and his followers by their right-wing opponents as alleged evidence of their lack of patriotism and Bolshevik sympathies.
1917 SRs election poster whose caption in red reads партія соц.-рев. (in pre-1918 Russian), short for Party of the Socialist-Revolutionaries; the banner bears the party's mottoRussian:Въ борьбѣ обрѣтешь ты право свое ("Through struggle you will attain your rights"); and the globe bears the sloganземля и воля ("land and freedom"), expressing theagrarian socialist ideology of the party.
TheFebruary Revolution allowed the SRs to return to an active political role. Party leaders, including Chernov, returned to Russia. They played a major role in the formation and leadership of the soviets, albeit in most cases playing second fiddle to the Mensheviks. One member,Alexander Kerensky, joined theRussian Provisional Government in March 1917 as Minister of Justice, eventually becoming the head of a coalition socialist-liberal government in July 1917, although his connection with the party was tenuous. He had served in theDuma with the social democraticTrudoviks, breakaway SRs that defied the party's refusal to participate in the Duma.
After the fall of the first coalition in April–May 1917 and the reshuffling of the Provisional Government, the party played a larger role. Its key government official at the time was Chernov who joined the government as Minister of Agriculture. Chernov also tried to play a larger role, particularly in foreign affairs, but he soon found himself marginalised and his proposals of far-reaching agrarian reform blocked by more conservative members of the government. After the failed Bolshevik uprising of July 1917, Chernov found himself on the defensive as allegedly soft on the Bolsheviks and was excluded from the revamped coalition in August 1917. The party was now represented in the government by Nikolai Avksentiev, a defensist, as Minister of the Interior.
This weakening of the party's position intensified the growing divide within it between supporters of the pluralistic Constituent Assembly, and those inclined toward more resolute, unilateral action. In August 1917,Maria Spiridonova advocated scuttling the Constituent Assembly and forming an SR-only government, but she was not supported by Chernov and his followers. This spurred a split in the SR party and the emergence of theParty of Left-Socialist Revolutionaries (Internationalists) or "Left SRs". The Left SRs were willing to temporarily cooperate with the Bolsheviks. The Left SRs believed that Russia should withdraw immediately fromWorld War I and they were frustrated that the Provisional Government wanted to postpone addressing the land question until after the convocation of theRussian Constituent Assembly instead of immediately confiscating the land from the landowners and redistributing it to the peasants.
Left SRs and Bolsheviks referred to the mainstream SR party as the "Right SR" party whereas mainstream SRs referred to the party as just "SR" and reserved the term "Right SR" for the right-wing faction of the party led byCatherine Breshkovsky and Avksentiev.[8] The primary issues motivating the split were participation in the war and the timing of land redistribution.
At theSecond All-Russian Congress of Soviets on 25 October, when the Bolsheviks proclaimed the deposition of the Provisional government inPetrograd, the split within the SR party became final. The Left SR stayed at the Congress and were elected to the permanentAll-Russian Central Executive Committee executive (while initially refusing to join the Bolshevik government) while the mainstream SR and their Menshevik allies walked out of the Congress. In late November, the Left SRs joined the Bolshevik government, obtaining three ministries.
In theelection to the Russian Constituent Assembly held two weeks after the Bolsheviks took power, the party still proved to be by far the most popular party across the country, gaining 37.6% of the popular vote as opposed to the Bolsheviks' 24%.[9] During a conflict between the new Bolshevik government and theCentral Rada in Ukraine, on 3–6 (N.S: 16–19) December 1917, the Ukrainian wing of Russian Socialist-Revolutionaries gathered in a congress inKiev, whose participants voted to express support for the Ukrainian autonomy and to establish a regional Ukrainian committee of the party.[10][page needed] However, after the Bolsheviks disbanded the Constitutional Assembly in January 1918, the SR lost political significance.[11] The Left SRs became the coalition partner of the Bolsheviks in the Soviet government, although they resigned their positions after theTreaty of Brest-Litovsk (the peace treaty with the Central Powers that ended Russia's participation in World War I). Both wings of the SR party were ultimately suppressed by the Bolsheviks through imprisoning some of its leaders and forcing others to emigrate.[12] A few Left SRs likeYakov Grigorevich Blumkin joined theCommunist Party.
Dissatisfied with the large concessions granted toImperial Germany by the Bolsheviks in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, twoChekists who were left SRs assassinated the German ambassador to Russia, CountWilhelm Mirbach early in the afternoon on 6 July.[13] Following the assassination, the left SRs attempted a "Third Russian Revolution" against the Bolsheviks on 6–7 July, but it failed and led to the arrest, imprisonment, exile and execution of party leaders and members. In response, some SRs turned to violence. A former SR,Fanny Kaplan, tried to assassinate Lenin on 30 August. Many SRs fought for theWhites orGreens in theRussian Civil War alongside some Mensheviks and other banned socialist elements. TheTambov Rebellion against the Bolsheviks was led by an SR,Aleksandr Antonov. InUfa the SRs'Provisional All-Russian Government was formed. However, afterAdmiral Kolchak was installed by the Whites as "Supreme Leader" in November 1918, he expelled allSocialists from the ranks. As a result, some SRs placed their organisation behind White lines at the service of the Red Guards and the Cheka.
The party continued its activities in exile. A Foreign Delegation of the Central Committee was established and based inPrague. The party was a member of theLabour and Socialist International between 1923 and 1940.[15]
^Hildermeier, M.,Die Sozialrevolutionäre Partei Russlands. Cologne 1978.
^Following this pattern, Soviet authorities called the trial of the SR Central Committee in 1922 the "Trial of the Right SRs". Russian emigres and most Western historians used the term "SR" to describe the mainstream party whileSoviet historians used the term "Right SR" until the fall of the USSR.
Lapeshkin, A. I. (1977). Yuridicheskaya literatura (ed.).The Soviet Federalism: Theory and Practice.
Geifman, Anna (2000). Scholarly Resources Inc. (ed.).Entangled in Terror: The Azef Affair and the Russian Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield.ISBN0-8420-2651-7.
Hildermeier, Manfred (200). Palgrave Macmillan (ed.).The Russian Socialist Revolutionary Party Before the First World War. St. Martin's Press.ISBN0312236301.
Immonen, Hannu (1988). Finnish Historical Society (ed.).The Agrarian Program of the Russian Socialist Revolutionary Party, 1900–1911.ISBN9518915075.
King, Francis (2007). Socialist History Society (ed.).The Narodniks in the Russian Revolution: Russia's Socialist-Revolutionaries in 1917 – a Documentary History. Socialist History Society.ISBN978-0-9555138-2-4.{{cite book}}:|work= ignored (help)
Radkey, Oliver (1964). Columbia University Press (ed.).The Sickle Under the Hammer: The Russian Socialist Revolutionaries in the Early Months of Soviet Rule. Columbia University Press.ISBN0231025246.
Rice, Christopher (1988). Palgrave Macmillan (ed.).Russian Workers and the Socialist Revolutionary Party Through the Revolution of 1905–07. St. Martin's Press.ISBN0312016743.
Schleifman, Nurit (1988). Palgrave Macmillan (ed.).Undercover Agents in the Russian Revolutionary Movement, SR Party 1902–1914. Macmillan.ISBN0333432657.