 Delta IV Heavy lifts off from SLC-6 in August 2013 | |||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||
| Launch site | Vandenberg Space Force Base | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 34°34′53″N120°37′36″W / 34.5813°N 120.6266°W /34.5813; -120.6266 | ||||||||||||
| Time zone | UTC−08:00 (PST) | ||||||||||||
• Summer (DST) | UTC−07:00 (PDT) | ||||||||||||
| Short name | SLC-6 | ||||||||||||
| Operator | United States Space Force (owner) SpaceX (tenant) | ||||||||||||
| Launch pad(s) | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Orbital inclination range | 55–145°[1] | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Vandenberg Space Launch Complex 6 (SLC-6, pronounced "Slick Six") is alaunch pad and associated support infrastructure atVandenberg Space Force Base inCalifornia. Construction at the site began in 1966, but the first launch didn't occur until 1995 due to program cancellations and subsequent repurposing efforts.
The site was originally envisioned to supportTitan IIIM rockets and theManned Orbiting Laboratory, however, these projects were terminated before SLC-6's completion. Between 1979 and 1986 the facilities received extensive modifications to accommodate theSpace Shuttle. However, budgetary constraints, safety considerations, and political factors ultimately led to the cancellation of Shuttle operations from the West Coast.
SLC-6 facilitated four launches ofAthena rockets between 1995 and 1999 with minimal modifications. Subsequently, it underwent modifications to support theDelta IV andDelta IV Heavy, which conducted ten successful missions between 2006 and 2022. In 2023, SpaceX secured a lease agreement for SLC-6, with plans to modify the facility forFalcon 9 andFalcon Heavy launches commencing in 2025.
Vandenberg's southward launch trajectory is advantageous for deploying satellites into high-inclination polar and Sun-synchronous orbits, needed for weather forecasting, Earth observation, and reconnaissance missions as they enable comprehensive and regular global coverage. Launching into such orbits from the East Coast of the United States presents significant challenges due to geographical constraints.[3]
SLC-6, part of Vandenberg's "South Base," was originally part of the Sudden Ranch, prior to its purchase by theU.S. Air Force in the mid-1960s under the law ofeminent domain. In addition to the ranch, thePoint Arguello Light was based there, which in 1967 was replaced by an automated light. There was also the Point ArguelloLORAN station, de-established 31 December 1979.[4]
NoTitans were launched from SLC-6. After purchase of south base, the Air Force started construction of the SLC-6 facility on 12 March 1966, to support launches of aTitan IIIM for theManned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL). After significant construction work was completed, the MOL program was cancelled on 10 June 1969, so further work on SLC-6 stopped as the facility was placed inmothball status.[5]
No Space shuttles were launched from SLC-6. With plans of launching civilian and military equatorial space shuttle flights fromKennedy Space Center (KSC) and military polar orbit flights from Vandenberg,NASA and the Air Force looked at different sites for launching the shuttle, finally deciding upon SLC-6, due to its dedicated crewed spaceflight role that was left over from the canceled MOL/Titan program.[6][7]
In 1972, Vandenberg AFB was chosen as the western launch site for Air Force shuttle launches. Use of SLC-6 was approved in 1975, and re-construction of the former MOL launch facility occurred between January 1979 and July 1986 as SLC-6 was rebuilt to accommodate the space shuttle.[8]
There were several reasons for using SLC-6:[7]
A Senate report summarized: "The Air Force originally justified the expenditure of such SLC-6 funding on the basis of a need to launch high-priority military payloads into polar orbits. After Defense Department officials testified that polar orbits could not be achieved by launching from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the Congress initiated construction of ... SLC-6."[7]
There were significant layout differences between the shuttle launch complexes at KSC and SLC-6 at Vandenberg, with the facilities at KSC closer together, but with stacking operations taking place right at the launch pad at SLC-6
At KSC, the Shuttle arrived at theShuttle Landing Facility airport either by gliding in from space or piggybacking on theShuttle Carrier Aircraft and then being unloaded using theMate-Demate Device. From there, it was towed a short distance to one of threeOrbiter Processing Facility hangars where it was refurbished. When the orbiter was ready, it was towed across the road to theVehicle Assembly Building where it was stacked atop amobile launcher platform. From there, the vehicle was taken to one of two pads atLaunch Complex 39 about a mile away by acrawler-transporter. At the launch pad, theRotating Service Structure allowed payloads to be loaded into the cargo bay on the pad.
At SLC-6, the existing 5,500-foot (1,700 m) runway at the North Base was expanded to match the Shuttle Landing Facility in Florida: 15,000 feet (4,600 m) in length with additional 1,000-foot (300 m) overruns on both ends to accommodate end-of-mission landings. Just off the runway, was theOrbiter Lifting Fixture, a scaled-down version of the Mate-Demate Device, and the Orbiter Maintenance and Processing Facility (OMPF) where the Shuttle would be refurbished.[7] When the orbiter was ready, the Orbiter Transport System, a 76-wheel transporter would have been used to transport the shuttle between the North Base facilities and SLC-6 over 17 miles (27 km) of base and public roadways. The route through the hills around the base required that hills be carved away along 2 miles (3.2 km) of the route to accommodate the orbiter’s wingspan.[9][10] At the launch pad, two buildings, the Shuttle Assembly Building and the Mobile Service Tower would envelop the access tower allowing the spacecraft to be stacked right on the launch pad.[11]
In all, over $4 billion were spent on the modifying SLC-6 for the Space Shuttle. The original Mobile Service Tower (MST) was lowered in height and two new flame ducts were added for the shuttle'ssolid rocket boosters. Additional modifications or improvements included liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen storage tanks, a payload preparation room, payload changeout room, a new launch tower with escape system for the shuttle crew members, sound suppression system and water reclamation area and a Shuttle Assembly Building were added to the original complex.[7]
Between November 1984 and May 1985, theSpace Shuttle Enterprise was mated with External Tank and SRBs inboilerplate configuration for a series of fit checks like those conducted atLC-39.[12] SLC-6 was declared operational during acceptance ceremonies held on 15 October 1985.[13][14] However, much additional work and testing was still required.
The inaugural polar-orbit flight, designatedSTS-62-A and usingSpace Shuttle Discovery with Shuttle veteranRobert Crippen as commander, was planned for 15 October 1986. However, theChallenger disaster of 28 January 1986 grounded the Shuttle fleet as efforts were concentrated on recovery and returning the program to flight after a two-year hiatus.[15]
On 31 July 1986, Secretary of the Air ForceEdward C. Aldridge, Jr., announced that Vandenberg's Space Shuttle program would be placed in "operational caretaker status", six months after the Space ShuttleChallenger accident. A few months later, however, SLC-6 was placed in "minimum caretaker status" on 20 February 1987.[8]
Eventually, on 13 May 1988, Secretary Aldridge then directed the Air Force to transfer Space Shuttle assets at Vandenberg to other organizations (specifically, the Kennedy Space Center) by 30 September 1989, the end of the fiscal year. The work was completed 10 days early on 20 September, when SLC-6 was placed in mothball status.[8]
Several factors accounted for this:[7]
The Air Force officially terminated the Space Shuttle program at Vandenberg on 26 December 1989. The estimated cost for the discontinued program was $4 billion.[16]
The Orbiter Lifting Fixture was relocated toUnited States Air Force Plant 42 where the orbiters were built and refurbished inPalmdale, California, before the delivery of theSpace Shuttle Endeavour in 1991. Previously, the orbiters were trucked to Armstrong Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base, about 36 miles (58 km) away, which took about 10 hours.[17] The Orbiter Lifting Fixture was dismantled in 2008.[18]
The Orbiter Transport System was sent to KSC where it was used to move orbiters between the Orbiter Processing Facility and the Vehicle Assembly Building. The vehicle was purchased by SpaceX in 2014 for $37,075.[10]
On 6 July 1990, Lockheed Space Operations Company (LSOC) was awarded an Air Force ground system contract to modify SLC-6 into aTitan IV/Centaur launch complex—essentially an uprated facility from the original MOL program that would have launched a Titan III vehicle.[19] Site work was scheduled to begin in late-FY 1992 with a planned initial launch capability sometime in FY1996.[20][21]
However, on 22 March 1991, HQ USAF reversed itself again by announcing the termination of the Titan IV/Centaur program at SLC-6.[21] The reasons given for the project being canceled was due to "insufficient Titan IV launch requirements from the West Coast to support the construction of a new launch pad." The contract with LSOC was closed out several months later.[22] Instead, USAF continued flying military polar orbit satellites using theTitan 34D and laterTitan IV rockets fromSLC-4E at Vandenberg.[21][23]
FourAthena missions flew from SLC-6, from 1995 to 1999. In the early 1990s,Lockheed Missiles and Space Company began studies on the prospect of a new family of small launch vehicles for commercial and other users. Lockheed eventually approved the development of theLockheed Launch Vehicle (LLV) program in January 1993. After the merger of Lockheed withMartin Marietta, it was renamedAthena.[24]
After another contract was issued in 1994 by the Air Force, modification work began on the existing SLC-6 shuttle launch mount for a small "milkstool" platform to be located over one of the two exhaust ducts originally intended for one of the large solid rocket boosters. The first operational launch from SLC-6 occurred on 15 August 1995, involving the Lockheed-Martin Launch Vehicle I (LMLV-1). Unfortunately, LMLV-1 was terminated in mid-flight after uncontrolled oscillations of the rocket were detected. This resulted in the loss of the vehicle and the payload. The cause of the mishap was later determined to be a guidance system failure coupled with overheating of the booster's first stage steering mechanism. The payload on board was GEMstar 1, a small communications satellite manufactured by CTA, Inc. for the Volunteers in Technical Assistance (VITA), a non-profit organization.[25]
After some hardware redesign and testing, a newly rechristenedAthena I successfully launched NASA'sLewis satellite into orbit from SLC-6 on 22 August 1997. Part of NASA's Small Spacecraft Technology Initiative (SSTI) and "Mission to Planet Earth" program.[26]
Another launch, on 24 September 1999, was successful as anIkonos satellite operated bySpace Imaging (later acquired byORBIMAGE to formGeoEye) was successfully placed into a polar orbit using an Athena 2 booster.[27]
TenDelta IV rockets were launched from SLC-6. With the advent of the Delta IV in the late 1990s,The Boeing Company received a lease from the Air Force on 1 September 1999, to modify SLC-6 once again to launch Boeing'sDelta IV.[28]
Some of the Shuttle-specific components at SLC-6 were removed, such as the mobile Payload Changeout Room, but the Assembly Building, Mobile Service Tower, Launch Tower,flame deflection trenches andsound suppression system and some other shuttle-oriented equipment were retained and made compatible for the new Delta IV rocket. The launch vehicle'sCommon Booster Core and associated flight hardware was transported from the Boeing factory inDecatur,Ala., to Vandenberg aboard theMV Delta Mariner cargo vessel that docked just south of SLC-6 at the same location originally constructed for receiving and offloading space shuttle external tanks.[29][30]
Boeing developed the Delta IV class of vehicles as its entrant in the Department of Defense'sEvolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program. EELV was intended to cut launch costs and simplify satellite launch processes.
After sitting on the pad since late-2003 and enduring technical issues with both the booster and the payload, the first of the Delta IV launch vehicles to fly from SLC-6 successfully lifted off at 8:33 p.m. PDT on 27 June 2006.[31][32]
The Delta IV Medium+ (4,2) rocket loftedNROL-22, a classified satellite for theNational Reconnaissance Office, into orbit. The payload was successfully deployed approximately 54 minutes later.[33] According to a post-launch Boeing News press release, the mission was the first for the NRO aboard a Delta IV and the second aboard a Delta rocket.
Another Delta IV Medium vehicle flew a mission for the Air ForceDefense Meteorological Satellite Program, orbiting DMSP-17, on 4 November 2006.[34]
The Delta IV and the lease on SLC-6 were turned over toUnited Launch Alliance (ULA) when ULA was formed as a joint venture of Boeing andLockheed Martin Space in December 2006.
On 20 January 2011, at 1:10 p.m. PST,USA-224 (NROL-49) was launched atop aDelta IV Heavy rocket. The launch was conducted by ULA and was the first flight of a Delta IV Heavy from Vandenberg.[35]
On 24 September 2022, ULA launched the last Delta IV Heavy from the pad, concluding their use of SLC-6.[36]Vulcan Centaur, Delta IV Heavy's successor, will launch from theAtlas V's old pad ofSLC-3E at Vandenberg.[37]
On 24 April 2023, theUnited States Space Force announced that it was leasing SLC-6 toSpaceX forFalcon 9 andFalcon Heavy launches.[38][39] Prior to its leasing, there was interest among other companies for control over the pad thanks to its large size, most notably byBlue Origin for theirNew Glenn orbital launch vehicle.[40] SpaceX expects to begin Falcon 9 launches from SLC-6 in 2025 and Falcon Heavy launches in 2026.[41] Since then, SpaceX has started reconfiguring the launch pad.[42]
| No. | Date/Time (UTC) | Type | Serial-no. | Payload | Type of payload | Orbit | Outcome | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995-08-15 22:30 | Athena I | DLV | GemStar 1 | Communications | LEO | Failure | First launch from SLC-6 |
| 2 | 1997-08-23 06:51:01 | Athena I | LM-002 | Lewis | Science | LEO | Success | |
| 3 | 1999-04-27 18:22:01 | Athena II | LM-005 | IKONOS 1 | Imaging | LEO | Failure | Payload fairing failed to separate and satellite did not achieve orbit |
| 4 | 1999-09-24 18:21:08 | Athena II | LM-007 | IKONOS 2 | Earth observation | LEO | Success | |
| 5 | 2006-06-28 03:33 | Delta IV Medium+ (4,2) | 317 | USA-184 (NROL-22) | ELINT | Molniya | Success | First Delta IV launch from Vandenberg[43] |
| 6 | 2006-11-04 13:53 | Delta IV Medium | 320 | USA-192 (DMSP F17) | Weather | SSO | Success | First Delta IV launch into aLEO/SSO |
| 7 | 2011-01-20 21:10 | Delta IV Heavy | 352 | USA-224 (NROL-49) | Optical imaging | LEO | Success[44] | First Delta IV Heavy launch from Vandenberg[44] |
| 8 | 2012-04-02 23:04 | Delta IV Medium+ (5,2) | 359 | USA-234 (NROL-25) | Radar imaging | LEO | Success | First Delta IV Medium+ (5,2) launch |
| 9 | 2013-08-28 18:03 | Delta IV Heavy | 364 | USA-245 (NROL-65) | Reconnaissance satellite | LEO | Success[45] | |
| 10 | 2016-02-10 11:40 | Delta IV Medium+ (5,2) | 373 | USA-267 (NROL-45) | Radar imaging | LEO | Success[46] | |
| 11 | 2018-01-12 22:11 | Delta IV Medium+ (5,2) | 379 | USA-281 (NROL-47) | Reconnaissance | LEO | Success | Final flight of Delta IV Medium+(5,2) |
| 12 | 2019-01-19 11:10 | Delta IV Heavy | 382 | USA-290 (NROL-71) | Reconnaissance | LEO | Success | |
| 13 | 2021-04-26 20:47 | Delta IV Heavy | 386 | USA-314 (NROL-82) | Reconnaissance | LEO | Success | |
| 14 | 2022-09-24 22:25 | Delta IV Heavy | 387 | USA-338 (NROL-91) | Reconnaissance | LEO | Success | Final flight of a Delta rocket from Vandenberg |
Media related toVandenberg Space Force Base Space Launch Complex 6 at Wikimedia Commons
Thor and Delta rockets | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockets |
| .jpg) | ||||||||||||
| Launch sites |
| |||||||||||||
| Components |
| |||||||||||||
| Manufacturers |
| |||||||||||||
| Launches | ||||||||||||||
| Launch vehicles |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spacecraft |
| ||||||||
| Test vehicles |
| ||||||||
| Rocket engines | |||||||||
| Lists of missions | |||||||||
| Launch facilities | |||||||||
| Landing sites |
| ||||||||
| Other facilities | |||||||||
| Support |
| ||||||||
| Contracts | |||||||||
| R&D programs | |||||||||
| Key people |
| ||||||||
| Related | |||||||||
* denotes unflown vehicles or engines, and future missions or sites. † denotes failed missions, destroyed vehicles, and abandoned sites. | |||||||||
