| Part ofa series on |
| Eastern Christianity |
|---|
 |
Mainstream communions |
Independent communions |
|
TheRuthenian Uniate Church (Belarusian:Руская уніяцкая царква,romanized: Ruskaja unijackaja carkva;Ukrainian:Руська унійна церква,romanized: Ruśka unijna cerkva;Latin:Ecclesia Ruthena unita;Polish:Ruski Kościół Unicki) was aparticular church of theCatholic Church in the territory of thePolish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. It was created in 1595/1596 by those clergy of theEastern Orthodox Church who subscribed to theUnion of Brest. In the process, they switched their allegiances andjurisdiction from theEcumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople to theHoly See.
The church had a single metropolitan territory — theMetropolis of Kiev, Galicia and all Ruthenia. The formation of the church led to a high degree of confrontation amongRuthenians, such as the murder of ArcheparchJosaphat Kuntsevych in 1623. Opponents of the union called church members "Uniates," though Catholic documents today no longer use the term due to its perceived negative overtones.[1]
 | Theneutrality of this section isdisputed. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please do not remove this message untilconditions to do so are met.(April 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Kievan Rus' is an ecclesiastical and cultural description of the eastern Rus' lands during the highMiddle Ages. The Greek and Latin equivalents of Rus' wereῬῶς ('Rhos'),Ruscia andRuthenia. It had been an empire rather than a nation state since it had many principalities and some non-Slavic people. By the time of the Union of Brest, these names covered all the Eastern Slav peoples and lands, regardless of whether they belonged politically to theGrand Duchy of Moscow, theGrand Duchy of Lithuania, the Crown of Poland or theCrown of Hungary. The Rus' accepted Christianity in itsByzantine form at the same time as the Poles accepted it in itsLatin form; Lithuanians largely remainedpagan to the lateMiddle Ages before their nobility embraced the Latin form upon thepolitical union with the Poles. The eastward expansion of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania had been facilitated by amicable treaties and inter-marriages of the nobility when faced with the external threat of theMongol invasion of Kievan Rus'.[2] Ethnically, the Catholics of the Commonwealth were Poles, Germans and Lithuanians.
During theProtestant Reformation of the 16th century, both the Catholic Church in the Commonwealth and the Ruthenian Church underwent a period of decay.[citation needed] The Ruthenian Church was the church of a people without statehood. The Poles considered the Ruthenians as a conquered people.[citation needed] Over time, the Lithuanian military and political ascendancy did away with the Ruthenian autonomies.[citation needed] The disadvantageous political status of the Ruthenian people also affected the status of their church and undermined her capacity for reform and renewal.[citation needed] Furthermore, they could not expect support from the Mother Church in Constantinople or from their co-religionists in Moscow. Thus the Ruthenian church was in a weaker position than the Catholic Church in the Commonwealth.[citation needed]
Both the Catholic and the Ruthenian churches suffered from thepolicy of nominations to higherbenefices by the King, the indifference of the nobility, and a low state of clerical education and discipline.[3][better source needed] The monarchs used nominations to bishoprics as rewards to faithful civil servants.[4][better source needed] After Metropolitan Joseph II Soltan (1509–1522), the names of the great families are missing among the nominees to the bishoprics. While the great families could have obtained the nominations had they cared, since they did not, the nominees came from the poorer gentry and from the burghers.[5][better source needed] Prelates continued to live the style of life they were used to as laymen: they took part in raids and carried on trade and money lending. The Ruthenian Church had nocathedral chapters to make up for the deficiencies of the bishops.[6]
The level of education of the Ruthenian peasantry had been falling during the sixteenth century.[7][better source needed] This was one of the main reasons for ecclesiastical decay and one of the impediments to renewal. For the common people, their religion was ritualism;[citation needed] attendance was often limited to baptism and church burial.
Poles regarded Ruthenians as a conquered people. As such, Ruthenians became a second class people in society, their culture backward compared to the other ethnic groups in the Commonwealth. This delayed the church in recovering from the predations of the Reformation. While the Ruthenian nobility had equal rights with the Polish nobility, by the fifteenth century their ranks had been thinned by war and waves of emigration to the east. The Poles who took their place came to control thesejm. If the Ruthenian aristocracy wanted to profit from its equality, it had to become Catholic and Polish. Intermarriage played a great role in the assimilation of the Ruthenian aristocracy; usually the Catholic faith prevailed. As a result, few Orthodox aristocratic families were left inGalicia orPodilia.[8][better source needed] By the second half of the sixteenth century, Ruthenian nobility had little reason to feel discriminated against. They had kept their wealth, had access to the highest offices, and were socially accepted as equals with the Catholic nobility. By absorbing the Polish form of Western culture, they were also the first to be lost for the Ruthenian people.[citation needed] With the loss of the elite, the Ruthenian Church and people increasingly lost leadership, representation in the government, and benefactors for church-sponsored programmes.[better source needed]
While the Catholic Church in the Commonwealth had successfully resisted the appeal of the Reformation, the Ruthenian church continued to decay. The Ruthenian elite looked externally for aid.[citation needed] The Patriarch in Constantinople could send neither aid nor teachers.[citation needed] Protestant aid was unacceptable to many of them. They therefore turned to the Pope in the hope that he would curb the excesses of the Polish Catholics against Catholic Ruthenians.[citation needed] In this way, they also hoped that acceptance of the Ruthenian hierarchy into Catholic communion would also lead to acceptance of the Ruthenian elite into the political structure of the Commonwealth.[citation needed]
At the time of the negotiations for union there were eight Ruthenian bishoprics in the Commonwealth:[10]
Later, theArcheparchy of Smolensk was erected.Carpathian Rus' did not belong to the Commonwealth.
Following the partitions, its successor states treated the Uniate Church differently. This is a list of eparchies that followed upon thepartitions of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (1772–1795):
In the territory annexed by the Russian Empire, the Church was effectively dissolved; most of the eparchies converted to theRussian Orthodox Church. SeeSynod of Polotsk.
In the territory annexed by the Kingdom of Prussia, the Eparchy ofSupraśl operated from 1798 to 1809. Following theTreaties of Tilsit, the territory was annexed by the Russian Empire. As a result, the Church was effectively dissolved and the eparchy was forcibly converted to the Russian Orthodox Church.
In the territory annexed by the Austrian Empire, the Church continued to operate. It was reorganized as aGreek Catholic Church — theMetropolis of Kiev, Galicia and all Ruthenia.
A similar situation continued in theSecond Polish Republic of 1918 to 1939. Suppressed in the Soviet Union from 1946, the Ruthenian Uniate Church survived to become the core of theUkrainian Greek Catholic Church from 1989. Today, the metropolis is styled theMajor Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia.
Metropolitans ofKyiv, Galicia and allRuthenia:[11]
There are three successor entities:
Today, the Ruthenian Uniate Church has two ecclesiastical jurisdictions: theUkrainian Greek Catholic Church and theBelarusian Greek Catholic Church. The Ukrainian jurisdiction operates in the following countries under a metropolitan bishop:
It operates in the following countries as eparchies under the care of the Major Archbishop :
It operates in the following countries as an exarchate, directly responsible to the Holy See:
[...] 1893 года на тему 'Проповедь Кунцевича', посвященных одному из героических эпизодов в жизни белорусского народа. Художник изобразил момент, когда монах-иезуит призывает жителей Витебска примкнуть к унии, [...]
Leaders of theRuthenian Uniate Church | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metropolitans of Kiev | |||||||||
| Church Primates afterpartitions of Poland |
| ||||||||
| Archeparchies |
| ||||||||
| Eparchies |
| ||||||||
| Related |
| ||||||||
