Rhoda (Biblical Greek:Ῥόδη,romanized: Rhodē) is awoman mentioned once in theNew Testament. She appears only inActs12:12–15. Rhoda was the first person to hearPeter afterGod freed him from prison, but no one believed her account that Peter was at the door because they knew he had been put in prison and couldn't believe that he had actually been freed.
Rhoda (whosename means "rose"[1]) was a girl (Biblical Greek:παιδίσκη) living in the house ofMary, the mother ofJohn Mark. Many biblical translations state that she was a 'maid' or 'servant girl'. After Peter was miraculously released from prison, he went to the house and knocked on the door. Rhoda came to answer it, and when she heard Peter's voice, she was so overjoyed that she rushed to tell the others and forgot to open the door for him. She told the group ofChristians who were praying that Peter was there. They did not believe her at first and told her she was "out of her mind." When she kept insisting that it was Peter, they said, "He is hisangel." Yet Peter kept on knocking, and eventually, they opened the door for him.
Peter had walked out of a prison chained to, and guarded by, Roman soldiers and confined behind secure walls; yet he was unable to get past a gate because a servant girl was too excited to open it for him. Christian historianJaroslav Pelikan suggests that it is "difficult not to smile when reading this little anecdote,"[2] while biblical scholarF. F. Bruce says that the scene is "full of vivid humor."[3] Pastor and theologianJohn Gill surmised that Rhoda recognized Peter's voice because she had "often heard him preach and converse [with Mary's] family".[4] However, theologians Donald Fay Robinson and Warren M. Smaltz have suggested that the incident involving Rhoda really represents an idealized account of the death of St. Peter, which may have occurred in a Jerusalem prison in 44 AD.[5]
Bruce Malina and John J. Pilch note that "Rhoda's behavior, both the surprised absentmindedness and the running, are considered humorous."[6] Margaret Aymer takes this further and suggests that the humor is due to Rhoda's low social status and enslavement. Aymer states that "Rhoda reminds us that, even in the Christian assembly, class oppression continues."[7]
Writing from afeminist perspective, Kathy Chambers argues that the narrative demonstrates "how Christian adaptations of comedic tropes challenged the dominant cultural construction of status and gender, of ecclesial authority, slaves, and women."[8]: 89 Chambers connects this story to the fulfillment inActs 2 of the prophecy ofJoel 2 that women and slaves would prophesy. Although "Rhoda lacked the necessary authority to have her message taken seriously because of her status of both woman andslave," she had enough courage and faith to keep insisting that it was Peter.[8]: 94
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
