Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) areclimate change scenarios to project futuregreenhouse gas concentrations. These pathways (ortrajectories) describe future greenhouse gas concentrations (notemissions) and have been formally adopted by theIPCC. The pathways describe different climate change scenarios, all of which were considered possible depending on the amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted in the years to come. The four RCPs – originally RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6, and RCP8.5 – are labelled after the expected changes inradiative forcing values from the year 1750^[1][2] to the year 2100 (2.6, 4.5, 6, and 8.5 W/m², respectively).^[3][4][5] The IPCCFifth Assessment Report (AR5) began to use these four pathways forclimate modeling and research in 2014. The higher values mean higher greenhouse gas emissions and therefore higherglobal surface temperatures and more pronouncedeffects of climate change. The lower RCP values, on the other hand, are more desirable for humans but would require more stringentclimate change mitigation efforts to achieve them.

In the IPCC'sSixth Assessment Report the original pathways are now being considered together withShared Socioeconomic Pathways. There are three new RCPs, namely RCP1.9, RCP3.4 and RCP7.^[6] A short description of the RCPs is as follows: RCP 1.9 is a pathway that limitsglobal warming to below 1.5 °C, the aspirational goal of theParis Agreement.^[6] RCP 2.6 is avery stringent pathway.^[6] RCP 3.4 represents an intermediate pathway between thevery stringent RCP2.6 and less stringent mitigation efforts associated with RCP4.5.^[7] RCP 4.5 is described by the IPCC as anintermediate scenario.^[8] In RCP 6, emissions peak around 2080, then decline.^[9] RCP7 is abaseline outcome rather than a mitigation target.^[6] In RCP 8.5 emissions continue to rise throughout the 21st century.^{[10]: Figure 2, p. 223}

For the extended RCP2.6 scenario, global warming of 0.0 to 1.2 °C is projected for the late 23rd century (2281–2300 average), relative to 1986–2005.^[11] For the extended RCP8.5, global warming of 3.0 to 12.6 °C is projected over the same time period.^[11]

The RCPs are consistent with a wide range of possible changes in future anthropogenic (i.e., human)greenhouse gas emissions, and aim to represent their atmospheric concentrations.^[12] Despite characterizing RCPs in terms of inputs, a key change from the 2007 to the 2014 IPCC report is that the RCPs ignore thecarbon cycle by focusing on concentrations of greenhouse gases, not greenhouse gas inputs.^[13] The IPCC studies the carbon cycle separately, predicting higher ocean uptake of carbon corresponding to higher concentration pathways, but land carbon uptake is much more uncertain due to the combined effect of climate change andland use changes.^[14]

The four RCPs are consistent with certain socio-economic assumptions but are being substituted with theshared socioeconomic pathways which are anticipated to provide flexible descriptions of possible futures within each RCP. The RCP scenarios superseded theSpecial Report on Emissions Scenarios projections published in 2000 and were based on similar socio-economic models.^[15]

RCP 1.9 is a pathway that limitsglobal warming to below 1.5 °C, the aspirational goal of theParis Agreement.^[6]

RCP 2.6 is a "very stringent" pathway.^[6]According to the IPCC, RCP 2.6 requires that carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions start declining by 2020 and go to zero by 2100. It also requires thatmethane emissions (CH₄) go to approximately half theCH₄ levels of 2020, and that sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions decline to approximately 10% of those of 1980–1990. Like all the other RCPs, RCP 2.6 requires negative CO₂ emissions (such as CO₂ absorption by trees). For RCP 2.6, those negative emissions would be on average 2 Gigatons of CO₂ per year (GtCO₂/yr).^[16] RCP 2.6 is likely to keep global temperature rise below 2 °C by 2100.^[8]

This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(March 2020)

RCP 3.4 represents an intermediate pathway between the "very stringent" RCP2.6 and less stringent mitigation efforts associated with RCP4.5.^[7] As well as just providing another option a variant of RCP3.4 includes considerableremoval of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.^[6]

RCP 4.5 is described by the IPCC as an intermediate scenario.^[8] Emissions in RCP 4.5 peak around 2040, then decline.^{[10]: Figure 2, p. 223} According to resource specialists IPCC emission scenarios are biased towards exaggerated availability offossil fuels reserves; RCP 4.5 is the most probable baseline scenario (no climate policies) taking into account the exhaustible character of non-renewable fuels.^[17][18]

According to the IPCC, RCP 4.5 requires that carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions start declining by approximately 2045 to reach roughly half of the levels of 2050 by 2100. It also requires that methane emissions (CH₄) stop increasing by 2050 and decline somewhat to about 75% of theCH₄ levels of 2040, and that sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions decline to approximately 20% of those of 1980–1990. Like all the other RCPs, RCP 4.5 requires negative CO₂ emissions (such as CO₂ absorption by trees). For RCP 4.5, those negative emissions would be 2 Gigatons of CO₂ per year (GtCO₂/yr).^[16] RCP 4.5 is more likely than not to result in global temperature rise between 2 °C and 3 °C, by 2100 with a meansea level rise 35% higher than that of RCP 2.6.^[19] Many plant and animal species will be unable to adapt to the effects of RCP 4.5 and higher RCPs.^[20]

In RCP 6, emissions peak around 2080, then decline.^[9] The RCP 6.0 scenario uses a high greenhouse gas emission rate and is a stabilisation scenario where total radiative forcing is stabilised after 2100 by employment of a range of technologies and strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 6.0 W/m² refers to the radiative forcing reached by 2100. Projections for temperature according to RCP 6.0 include continuous global warming through 2100 where CO₂ levels rise to 670 ppm by 2100 making the global temperature rise by about 3–4 °C by 2100.^[21]

RCP7 is a baseline outcome rather than a mitigation target.^[6]

In RCP 8.5 emissions continue to rise throughout the 21st century.^{[10]: Figure 2, p. 223} RCP8.5 is generally taken as the basis for worst-case climate change scenarios. Since the publication of theIPCC Fifth Assessment Report (2014) the likelihood of this RCP has been debated, due to overestimation of projected coal outputs.^[22][23] On the other hand, many uncertainties remain oncarbon cycle feedbacks, which could lead to warmer temperatures than projected in representative concentration pathways.^[24] RCP 8.5 is still used for predicting mid-century (and earlier) emissions based on current and stated policies.^[25]

Mid- and late 21st-century (2046–2065 and 2081–2100 averages, respectively) projections of global warming and global mean sea level rise from the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC AR5 WG1) are tabulated below. The projections are relative to temperatures and sea levels in the late 20th to early 21st centuries (1986–2005 average). Temperature projections can be converted to a reference period of 1850–1900 or 1980–99 by adding 0.61 or 0.11 °C, respectively.^[26]

Across all RCPs, global mean temperature is projected to rise by 0.4 to 2.6°C (1.5°C) by the mid 21st century and by 0.3 to 4.8°C (2.55°C) by the late 21st century.

According to a 2021 study in which plausible AR5 and RCP scenarios of CO₂ emissions are selected,^[27]

Across all RCPs, the global temperature will reach 3°C to 3.25°C above pre-industrial levels in 2100.

Across all RCPs, global mean sea level is projected to rise by 0.17 to 0.38 meters (0.275 meters) by the mid 21st century and by 0.26 to 0.82 meters (0.54 meters) by the late 21st century.

TheIPCC Fifth Assessment Report also projected changes in climate beyond the 21st century. The extended RCP2.6 pathway assumes sustained net negative anthropogenic GHG emissions after the year 2070.^[12]Negative emissions means that in total, humans absorb more GHGs from the atmosphere than they release. The extended RCP8.5 pathway assumes continued anthropogenic GHG emissions after 2100.^[12] In the extended RCP 2.6 pathway, atmospheric CO₂ concentrations reach around 360 ppmv by 2300, while in the extended RCP8.5 pathway, CO₂ concentrations reach around 2000 ppmv in 2250, which is nearly seven times the pre-industrial level.^[12]

Between these RCPs, atmospheric CO₂ concentrations reach around 1180 ppmv by the late 23rd century.

For the extended RCP2.6 scenario, global warming of 0.0 to 1.2°C (0.6°C) is projected for the late 23rd century (2281–2300 average), relative to 1986–2005.^[11] For the extended RCP8.5, global warming of 3.0 to 12.6°C (7.8°C) is projected over the same time period.^[11]

Between these RCPs, global warming of 1.5 to 6.9°C (4.2°C) is projected for the late 23rd century (2281-2300 average).

• Coupled Model Intercomparison Project – Collaboration for climate change study
• IPCC Sixth Assessment Report – Intergovernmental report on climate change
• Special Report on Emissions Scenarios – 2000 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
• Shared Socioeconomic Pathways – Climate change scenarios

• Special Issue: The representative concentration pathways: an overview,Climatic Change, Volume 109, Issue 1–2, November 2011. Most papers in this issue are freely accessible.
• The Guardian: A guide to the IPCC's new RCP emissions pathways (2013)

• Climate change assessment and attribution
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
• Greenhouse gas emissions

• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Articles to be expanded from March 2020
• All articles to be expanded