Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Reginald Scot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
English politician and author (c.1538–1599)

"Reginald Scott" redirects here. For the Canadian author, seeR.T.M. Scott.
Reginald Scot
Reginald Scot
Born1538
Died9 October 1599(1599-10-09) (aged 60–61)
England
Occupation(s)Author, politician
Known forThe Discoverie of Witchcraft

Reginald Scot (orScott) (c. 1538 – 9 October 1599) was an Englishman andMember of Parliament, the author ofThe Discoverie of Witchcraft, which was published in 1584. It was written against the belief in witches, to show thatwitchcraft did not exist. Part of its content exposes how (apparently miraculous) feats of magic were done, and the book is often deemed the first textbook onconjuring.[citation needed]

Life

[edit]

He was son of Richard Scot, second son ofSir John Scott (died 1533) ofScots Hall inSmeeth, nearAshford inKent. His mother was Mary, daughter of George Whetenall, sheriff of Kent in 1527. His father died before 1544, and his mother remarried Fulk Onslow, clerk of the parliament; dying on 8 October 1582, she was buried in the church ofHatfield, Hertfordshire. Reginald or Reynold (as he signed his name in accordance with contemporary practice) was born about 1538.

When about seventeen, Scot enteredHart Hall, Oxford, but left the university without a degree. His writings show some knowledge of law, but he is not known to have joined anyinn of court. Marrying in 1568, he seems to have spent the rest of his life in his native county. His time was mainly passed as an active country gentleman, managing property which he inherited from his kinsfolk about Smeeth andBrabourne, or directing the business affairs of his first cousin, Sir Thomas Scot, who proved a generous patron, and in whose house of Scots Hall he often stayed. He was collector of subsidies for thelathe (county subdivision) of Shepway in 1586 and 1587, and he was perhaps the Reginald Scot who acted in 1588 as a captain of untrained foot-soldiers at the county muster. He was returned to the parliament of 1588–89 as member forNew Romney, and he was probably ajustice of the peace. He describes himself as "esquire" in the title-page of hisDiscoverie, and is elsewhere designated "armiger".

Scot married at Brabourne, on 11 October 1568, Jane Cobbe of Cobbes Place, in the parish ofAldington. By her he had a daughter Elizabeth, who married Sackville Turnor of Tablehurt,Sussex. Subsequently, Scot married a second wife, a widow named Alice Collyar, who had a daughter called Mary by her former husband.

Scot made his own will (drawing it with his own hand) on 15 September 1599. He died at Smeeth on 9 October following, and was probably buried in the church of St. Mary the Virgin, Brabourne, with his first wife Jane. His small properties about Brabourne, Aldington, andRomney Marsh he left to his widow. The last words of his will run: "Great is the trouble my poor wife hath had with me, and small is the comfort she hath received at my hands, whom if I had not matched withal I had not died worth onegroat."

Doctrine and espoused belief

[edit]

In theDiscoverie, Scot aligns himself withReformed Protestantism, quotingJohn Calvin more than a dozen times. Calvin in turn was echoing the skepticism toward superstitions of early English reformerJohn Wycliffe.[1] Scot expresses what is often called theProvidential view in stating that "it is neither a witch, nor devil, but glorious God that maketh the thunder...God maketh the blustering tempests and whirlwinds..."[2] This doctrine was also aligned with the tenth-centuryCanon Episcopi and Scot quotes from it.[3] In the last half of the sixteenth century, an active theological debate continued from various pulpits throughout Europe – Calvinist, Lutheran, and Roman Catholic – between those who supported the skeptical Episcopi/Providential tradition and those who believed that witches could obtain real supernatural powers through an agreement or pact with the devil.[4] The latter belief in the power of witches, and an intense phobia toward them, was associated by Scot with the bookMalleus Maleficarum by the German inquisitorHeinrich Kramer, and upon this book Scot focuses the most criticism, and lumps others aligned with the same view of witchcraft: "...from whom[Jean] Bodin and all the other writers... do receive their light..."[5]

A late twentieth-century historian argues that Scot was likely to have been influenced by, and perhaps was a member of, theFamily of Love.[6] An intriguing clue to this theory is the nameAbraham Fleming written backwards (Gnimelf Maharba) in Scot's lengthy bibliography in the front pages of theDiscoverie.

Works

[edit]

About hops cultivation

[edit]

In1574 he published hisPerfect Platform of a Hop-garden, and necessary instructions for the making and maintenance thereof, with Notes and Rules for Reformation of all Abuses. The work, which is dedicated toSerjeantWilliam Lovelace ofBethersden inKent, is the first practical treatise onhop culture in England; the processes are illustrated by woodcuts. Scot, according to a statement of the printer, was out of London while the work was going through the press. A second edition appeared in 1576, and a third in 1578.

About witchcraft and magic

[edit]
Main article:The Discoverie of Witchcraft

His work on witchcraft wasThe Discoverie of Witchcraft,wherein the Lewde dealing of Witches and Witchmongers is notablie detected, in sixteen books … whereunto is added a Treatise upon the Nature and Substance of Spirits and Devils, 1584. Scot enumerates 212 authors whose works in Latin he had consulted, and twenty-three authors who wrote in English. He studied the superstitions respecting witchcraft in courts of law in country districts, where the prosecution of witches was constant, and in village life, where the belief in witchcraft flourished. He set himself to prove that the belief in witchcraft and magic was rejected alike by reason and religion, and that spiritualistic manifestations were either wilful impostures or illusions due to mental disturbance in the observers. The book also includes several chapters describingconjuring andsleight of hand tricks in detail.[7]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Wycliffe, John (1842).An Apology for Lollard Doctrines. London: Camden Society. p. 92.
  2. ^Scot, Reginald (1584).Discoverie of Witchcraft. Brome. p. 2.
  3. ^Scot,Discoverie, pp. 65–66, 97.
  4. ^HC Erik Midelfort,Witch Hunting in Southwest Germany (Stanford, 1972) pp. 56–66. Also by Midelfort, see 1971 essay,Witchcraft and Religion in Sixteenth-Century Germany, The Formation and Consequences of Orthodoxy.
  5. ^Scot,Discoverie, pp. 9, 11, 19, 77, 78. ff.
  6. ^David Wootton, Reginald Scot/ Abraham Fleming/ The Family of Love,Languages of Witchcraft, ed. Stuart Clark. (New York, 2001) pp. 119–138.
  7. ^Copperfield, David;Wiseman, Richard; Britland, David (2021).David Copperfield's history of magic. New York, NY.ISBN 978-1-9821-1291-2.OCLC 1236259508.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

Attribution

Further reading

[edit]

Other publications:

  • Haight, Anne Lyon (1978).Banned Books, 387 B.C. to 1978 A.D.. updated and enl. by Chandler B. Grannis (4th ed.). New York: R.R. Bowker.ISBN 0-8352-1078-2.
  • Leland L. EstesReginald Scot and His "Discoverie of Witchcraft": Religion and Science in the Opposition to the European Witch Craze, Church History, Vol. 52, No. 4 (Dec. 1983), pp. 444–456.
  • Philip C. Almond.England's First Demonologist: Reginald Scot and 'The Discoverie of Witchcraft'. (London: 2011)

External links

[edit]
International
National
People
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reginald_Scot&oldid=1282186529"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp