 | |
  Shown within Haryana Show map of Haryana Rakhigarhi (India) Show map of India Rakhigarhi (South Asia) Show map of South Asia | |
| Alternative name | Rakhi Garhi |
|---|---|
| Location | Haryana,India |
| Coordinates | 29°17′35″N76°6′51″E / 29.29306°N 76.11417°E /29.29306; 76.11417 |
| Type | Settlement |
| Area | 350 ha (860 acres)[web 1] |
| History | |
| Cultures | Indus Valley civilisation |
| Site notes | |
| Excavation dates | 1963, 1997–2000, 2012–2016, 2021–present[web 2] |
Rakhigarhi orRakhi Garhi is a village and anarchaeological site in theHisar District of the northernIndian state ofHaryana, situated about 150 km northwest ofDelhi. It is located in theGhaggar River plain,[1] some 27 km from the seasonal Ghaggar river, and belonged to theIndus Valley civilisation, being part of the pre-Harappan (6000?/4600-3300 BCE), early Harappan (3300-2600 BCE), and the mature phase (2600-1900 BCE) of the Indus Valley Civilisation.[2]
It was one of the five largest settlements of the ancient civilisation, with most scholars prior to 2014 reporting it to have been between 80 hectares and 100+ hectares in area,[3][4][5][6][7][1][note 1] comprising five closely-integratedarchaeological mounds as the extent of mature-phase urban habitations. A sixth mound situated in the vicinity, but outside of this group, represented a distinct older period and was likely a separate settlement,[3] while a seventh mound was a cemetery or burial ground belonging to the mature phase.[8][3][9] The discovery of two more mounds (in addition to the seven that were already known)—respecitvely situated approximately 1 km north/east and 1 km south/west of the main group of mounds[10]—was made in 2014: it consequently was claimed by theArchaeological Survey of India (ASI) that the discovery made Rakhigarhi the largest-known site of the Harappan civilisation,[web 1] with the spread of archaeological remains being encompassed within a total area of 300 to 350 hectares. However, this figure includes outlying remains which were likely not all integrated as part of a single urban settlement at any singular time.[3][11]
Initial excavations at the site happened in the 1960s, followed by further excavations in the late 1990s, however more sustained excavations have taken place in the past decade.[web 2] though much of the area is yet to be excavated[12][web 3] and published.[13] Other related excavation sites in the area areMitathal and the smaller siteLohari Ragho, which are still awaiting excavation.
The conduct of digs by theArchaeological Survey of India (ASI), including at Rakhigarhi, has come under criticism for being like a "zamindari" system wherein "the individual excavation director" "had nearly dictatorial control over the material excavated",[14] and questions are being raised about the scientific quality of the ASI's excavations of a number of Harappan sites.[15] Scholarly interpretation of Rakhigarhi, as with a number of other archaeological sites of ancient India, has been subject to contestation regarding the methodologies and ideology of the ASI: many senior officials of the ASI have been "embroiled in controversies" over pseudo-"scientific" efforts to legitimise theHindutva ideology which identifies the ancient Harappans (incorrectly) with theVedas andSanskrit, in order to synthesize the nationalist narrative of Indian civilisation as indigenous and continuous since its beginning,allegedly originating from the banks of theSaraswati River (rather than the Indus).[16]
DNA-tests by Shinde et al. (2019) on a single skeleton show that the DNA did not include any traces of steppe ancestry, in line with theAryan migration theory, which says that Indo-Aryans migrated to India from the steppes after the Harappan civilisation had started to disintegrate.[9]
It is located in the Ghaggar plain,[1] some 27 km from the seasonal Ghaggar river. Today, Rakhigarhi is a small village in Haryana State, India.[web 4] According toJane McIntosh, Rakhigarhi is located in the valley of the prehistoricDrishadvati River that originated inSiwalik Hills.[17]Chautang is a tributary ofSarsuti river which in turn is a tributary of Ghaggar river.[web 5][web 6]
Most scholars, includingGregory Possehl,Jonathan Mark Kenoyer,Raymond Allchin andRita P. Wright believe Rakhigari to have been between 80 hectares and 100+ hectares in size.[6][5][3][7][1][4][note 1] According to Nath et al. (2015), "[a]rchaeological remains at Rakhigari extend over a radius of [300 hectares (3.0 km2)] encompassing a set of seven mounds of which 1 to 5 are integrated while a few are removed from each other."[18]
The mounds are numbered following the naming convention of"RGR-x" e.g. RGR-1 to RGR-11.[web 7] Until 2014, seven mounds were known. The 2014 excavation discovered two more mounds, RGR-8 and RGR-9, situated east and west of the main site, and largely destroyed for cultivation. According toVasant Shinde each mound has a size of 25 hectares, taking the total site size to 350 hectares (3.5 km2), and thus making Rakhigarhi largest Indus Valley Civilisation site by overtakingMohenjodaro (300 hectares) by 50 hectares.[web 1][web 8]
It is likely that not allmounds in Rakhigarhi belong to the same Indus Valley settlement.[3] Five closely-integrated mounds, namely RGR-1 through RGR-5, have been considered as representing the major extent of mature-phase urban settlement, extending over 80 to 100+ hectares. In addition there was RGR-6, also known as "Arda", a mound situated in the vicinity but outside of this group, to the northwest:[8] it "was probably a separate settlement",[3] as it represented primarily an older period of occupation. (It was also re-occupied, after a long period of abandonment, more than two thousand years later during theKushan Period.[19]) RGR-7 was another mound lying to the north, representing a cemetery or burial ground belonging to the mature phase.[8][3] The discovery of two more mounds (in addition to the seven that were already known)—respecitvely situated approximately 1 km north/east and 1 km south/west of the main group of mounds[10]—was made in 2014: it consequently was claimed by theArchaeological Survey of India (ASI) that the discovery made Rakhigarhi the largest-known site of the Harappan civilisation,[web 1] with the spread of archaeological remains being encompassed within a total area of 300 to 350 hectares. However, this figure includes outlying remains which were likely not all integrated as part of the same urban settlement at any singular time.[3][11]
According to Tejas Garge the earliest settlements in Rakhigarhi predate the Indus Valley Civilization, with a "tentative chronological bracket" of "6000(?)-4600-3800" for the "lowermost levels" of Rakhigarhi, and "3200-2800 B.C.E." for the remainder of Period I.[2] According to Possehl not all mounds in Rakhigarhi belong to the same Indus Valley settlement, stating that "RGR-6, aSothi-Siswal site known as Arda, was probably a separate settlement."[3] Mounds RGR1 to RGR-6 are residential sites belonging to"pre-formation age early Harappan" era, while mound RGR-7 is a burial site where human skeletons were found.[web 9]
ASI has carbon dated mound labelled RGR-1, RGR-2, RGR-6 and RGR-7. The RGR-6 has two layers ofPreharappan Phase dating to 5,640years before present (BP) and 5,440 (BP). The RGR-1 hasEarly Harappan Phase dating to 5,200 and 4,570 years BP. The RGR-2 also hasEarly Harappan Phase dated to 5,200 and 4,570 years as well as two additional samples belonging toMature Harappan Phase dating to 4,040 and 3,900 years BP.[web 9] RGR-7, which is a cemetery or a burial site fromMature Harappan Phase, dates back to 4600 BP.[9][web 10]
In 2014 six radiocarbon datings from excavations at Rakhigarhi between 1997 and 2000 were published by archaeologist Amarendra Nath, corresponding to the Pre-formative, Early Harappan, and Mature Harappan phases. Mound RGR-6 revealed a Pre-formative stage designated asSothi Phase with the following two datings: and years before present, converted toB.C.E. andB.C.E.[20]
Rakhigarhi, being the largest town and regional trade centre of IVC era, is surrounded bynumerous IVC sites nearby in Haryana, Rajasthan and Punjab along the Gagghar-Hakra river course. The important ones among those are theBhirrana (4 phases of IVC with earliest dated to 8th-7th millennium BCE) 86 km northwest,[21][22]Kunal (belonging toKunal cultural which is the cultural ancestor ofRehman Dheri site) 75 km northwest,[23][24]Siswal (belonging toSothi-Siswal culture dated to 3800 BC, contemporaneous toEarly-Harappan Phase) 75 km west,[25][26] andKalibangan (another large regional IVC city with several phases starting from Early harappan phase) 235 km west,[27] and few more.
There are many other important archaeological sites in this area, in the old river valley to the east of the Ghaggar Plain. Among them areKalibangan,Kunal,Balu,Bhirrana, andBanawali.[20]
By 2020, only 5% of the site had been excavated by the ASI and Deccan College.[web 3]
While the earliest excavation of IVC sites started from Harappa in 1921-1922 and Mohenjo-daro in 1931, the excavations at Rakhigarhi were first carried out in 1969, followed by more excavations in 1997–98, 1998–99 and 1999–2000, between 2011–16 and 2021 onward. There are 11 mounds in Rakhigarhi which are named RGR-1 to RGR-11, of which RGR-5 is thickly populated by establishment of Rakhishahpur village and is not available for excavations. RGR-1 to RGR-3, RGR6 to RGR9 and some part of RGR-4 are available for excavations.[web 7][web 8][28][web 1][web 9]
In 1963,Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) began excavations at this site, and, though little has been published about the excavations.[29][30]
In 1969,Kurukshetra University's team studied and documented the site led by its Dean of Indic studies Dr.Suraj Bhan.[31]
In 1997–98, 1998–99 and 1999–2000, ASI team began to excavate the site again, which was led by its director Dr. Amrender Nath who published his findings in scholarly journals.[31][32] After 2000, excavations were stopped for years because of aCBI investigation on the misuse of funds.[33] Much of the findings are donated to the National Museum, New Delhi.
From 2011 to 2016,Deccan College carried out several substantial excavations led by its then Vice-Chancellor and archaeologist Dr. Vasant Shinde, several members of the team published their findings in various academic journals.[34][35]
From 2021 onward, more excavation by ASI commenced.Central University of Haryana and Dr Vasant Shinde also expressed interest in commencing excavation.[web 9]
Findings confirm both early and mature Harappan phases and include 4,600-year-old human skeletons, fortification and bricks.[web 3]
The ASI's detailed excavation of the site revealed the size of the lost city and recovered numerous artefacts, some over 5,000 years old. Rakhigarhi was occupied at Early Harappan times.[12][28] Evidence of paved roads, drainage system, large rainwater collection, storage system,terracotta bricks, statue production, and skilled working ofbronze and precious metals have been uncovered.[citation needed] Jewellery, including bangles made from terracotta,conch shells, gold, and semi-precious stones, have also been found.[36]
Digging so far reveals a well planned city with 1.92 m wide roads, a bit wider than inKalibangan. The pottery is similar to Kalibangan andBanawali. Pits surrounded by walls have been found, which are thought to be for sacrificial or some religious ceremonies. There are brick lined drains to handle sewage from the houses. Terracotta statues, weights, bronze artefacts, comb, copper fish hooks, needles and terracotta seals have also been found. A bronze vessel has been found which is decorated with gold and silver. A gold foundry with about 3000 unpolished semi-precious stones has been found. Many tools used for polishing these stones and a furnace were found there. A burial site has been found with 11 skeletons, with their heads in the north direction. Near the heads of these skeletons, utensils for everyday use were kept. The three female skeletons have shell bangles on their left wrists. Near one female skeleton, a gold armlet has been found. In addition semi precious stones have been found lying near the head, suggesting that they were part of some sort of necklace.
A granary belonging to mature Harappan phase (2600 BCE to 2000 BCE) has been found here. Granary is made up of mud-bricks with a floor of ramped earth plastered with mud. It has 7 rectangular or square chambers. Significant traces of lime & decomposed grass are found on the lower portion of the granary wall indicating that it can also be the storehouse of grains with lime used as insecticide & grass used to prevent entry of moisture. Looking at the size, it appears to be a public granary or a private granary of elites.[37]
Hunting tools like copper hafts and fish hooks have been found here. Presence of various toys like mini wheels, miniature lids, sling balls, animal figurines indicates a prevalence of toy culture. Signs of flourishing trade can be seen by the excavation of stamps, jewellery and 'chert' weights. Weights found here are similar to weights found at many other IVC sites confirming presence of standardised weight systems.[38]
Fire altars andapsidal structures were revealed in Rakhigarhi.[web 7][dead link]
Cotton cloth traces preserved on silver or bronze objects were known from Rakhigarhi,Chanhudaro andHarappa.[39] An impressive[quantify] number of stamps seals were also found at this site.[12]
A cemetery of Mature Harappan period is discovered at Rakhigarhi, with eight graves found. Often brick covered grave pits had wooden coffin in one case.[12] Different type of grave pits were undercut to form an earthen overhang and body was placed below this; and then top of grave was filled with bricks to form a roof structure over the grave.[13]
So far 53 burial sites with 46 skeletons have been discovered. Anthropological examination done on 37 skeletons revealed 17 to be of adults, 8 to be of subadults while the age of 12 skeletons could not be verified. Sex detection of 17 skeletons was successful out of which 7 were male and 10 female skeletons. Most of the burials were typical burials with skeletons in a supine position. Atypical burials had skeletons in a prone position. Some graves are just pits while some are brick lined and contain pottery. Some of them also had votive pots with animal remains symbolising offerings to the dead. Bone remains of secondary burials were not charred hence ruling out the possibility of cremation practices. While these burials retained many of the Harappan features, group burials and prone position burials are distinct. Paleo-parasitical studies and DNA analysis to determine the lineage is being undertaken.[40][41]
Parasite eggs which were once existed in the stomach of those buried were found in the burial sites along with human skeletons. Analysis of HumanaDNA obtained from human bones as well as analysis of parasite and animal DNA will be done to assert origins of these people.[42][43]
In April 2015, four 4,600-year-old complete human skeletons were excavated from mound RGR-7. These skeletons belonged to two male adults, one female adult (classified as 'I6113') and one child.[9] Pottery with grains of food as well as shell bangles were found around these skeletons.[44][web 3]
 Photo of theskeleton of"Rakhigarhi love birds" buried together with male (11A) facing the woman (11B), with theirfeet pointing south and head towards north.[45] |
Two of the skeletons, a man between 35 and 40 years old and women in early 20s, who died around the same time. They were found buried together side by side with men's head facing the women. Their ceremonial burial indicates that they were not in illicit relationship and the lovebirds were likely married to each other. Pots found in their grave likely carried food and water asoffering to the dead. Theagate found near he collar bone of the male was likely part of a necklace.[46][45] The male was 177 cm (5 ft9+1⁄2 in) tall and female was171 cm (5 ft7+1⁄2 in). Their skeleton had no abnormalities, injuries or sign of disease. They were both likely"quite healthy" at the time of their death.[47]
Shinde et al. (2019) have carried out DNA-tests on a single skeleton. Results announced in September 2018, and a paper published inCell Magazine in 2019, show that the DNA did not include any traces of steppe ancestry, which is in line with theAryan migration theory, which says that Indo-Aryans migrated to India from the steppes after the Harappan civilisation had started to disintegrate.[9][48][49]
A total of 61 skeletons were found till 2016.[citation needed] As the skeletons were excavated scientifically without any contamination, archaeologists think that with the help of latest technology on these skeletons and DNA obtained, it is possible to determine how Harappans looked like 4500 years ago.[web 10] The average height is estimated to have been 175.8 cm (5 ft 9 in) for men and166.1 cm (5 ft5+1⁄2 in) for women.[50]
In 2024, the 'Mound 7' of the excavation site, which encompasses an area of 3.5 sqkms, yielded 56 skeletons.[51]
In May 2012, the Global Heritage Fund declared Rakhigarhi one of the ten most endangered heritage sites in Asia facing the threat of irreparable loss and destruction due to development pressures, insufficient management and looting.[web 8][52] A 2012 study by theSunday Times found that the site is not being looked after; the iron boundary wall is broken, and villagers sell the artefacts they dig out of the site and parts of site are now being encroached by private houses.[53] Due to the lack of site protection the site is being destroyed by soil erosion, encroachments, illegal sand lifting, theft of archaeological artefacts for illegal sale. It is a punishable crime to sell or buy artefacts found in the ancient sites. 80% of mound 6 – a residential site of Harappan Era and 7 which is a burial site where 4 human skeletons were recovered in 2015 have been destroyed due to cultivation and soil mining.[web 8]
Parts of mounds R4 and R5 have been encroached by the villagers who have built 152 houses.[web 3] The ASI has only 83.5 acres of the 350-hectare site that entails 11 archaeological mounds, due to encroachments and pending court cases for the removal of the encroachments.[web 3]
In February 2020, Union Finance MinisterNirmala Sitharaman announced that the site of Rakhigarhi would be developed as an iconic site.[54] ASI has commenced the plan to remove encroachments from the site, including 152 houses on the R4 and R5 mounds. Villages, whose houses in the site will be removed, will be relocated and rehabilitated in the housing flats on another location.[web 3]
Rakhigarhi, which is anIndus Valley civilisation site, also has a museum developed by the state government.[55] There is alsoHaryana Rural Antique Museum 60 km away, which is maintained byCCS HAU in its Gandhi Bhawan, exhibits evolution of agriculture and vanishing antiques.[56]Jahaj Kothi Museum, named afterGeorge Thomas, is located insideFiroz Shah Palace Complex and maintained byArchaeological Survey of India.[57]
To develop Rakhigarhi as the global heritage, twojohad (water bodies) across the road to museum are developed as lakes. The lake has been deepened by digging and traditionalghats withburji on the banks of lake have been constructed. A park is developed the spare land of the lake. A walking track around the lake, with shady trees and fruit trees, has been constructed for the tourists.[58] The traditional ghats represent the past scenario when paleo-Drishadvati river use to flow through Rakhigarhi which had ghats for transporting goods for trade, viaLothal port andDholavira, as far asMesopotamia (ancient cities ofElam andSumer).[59]
.png)
