King of the Romans (Latin:Rex Romanorum;German:König der Römer) was the title used by the king ofEast Francia following his election by theprinces from the reign ofHenry II (1002–1024) onward.
The title originally referred to any German king between hiselection and coronation asHoly Roman Emperor by thepope. The title was also used to designate the successor to the throne elected during the lifetime of a sitting Emperor. From the 16th century onwards, as German kings adopted the title of Emperor-elect and ceased to be crowned by the pope, the title continued to be used solely for an elected successor to the throne during his predecessor's lifetime.
The actual title varied over time. During theOttonian period, it wasKing of the Franks (German:König der Franken, Latin:Rex Francorum), from the lateSalian period it wasKing of the Romans (German:König der Römer, Lat.:Rex Romanorum). In the Modern Period, the titleKing in Germania (German:König in Germanien, Lat.:Germaniae Rex) came into use. Finally, modern German historiography established the termRoman-German King (Römisch-deutscher König) to differentiate it both from the classicalRoman Emperor as well as from the modernGerman Emperor.
The territory ofEast Francia was not referred to as theKingdom of Germany orRegnum Teutonicum by contemporary sources until the 11th century. During this time, the king's claim to coronation was increasingly contested by thepapacy, culminating in the fierceInvestiture Controversy. After theSalianheir apparentHenry IV, a six-year-old minor, had been elected to rule the Empire in 1056 he adoptedRomanorum Rex as a title to emphasize his sacred entitlement to be crowned Emperor by the Pope.Pope Gregory VII insisted on using the derogatory termTeutonicorum Rex ("King of the Germans") in order to imply that Henry's authority was merely local and did not extend over the whole Empire. Henry continued to regularly use the titleRomanorum Rex until he finally was crowned Emperor byAntipope Clement III in 1084. Henry's successors imitated this practice, and were also calledRomanorum Rex before andRomanorum Imperator after their Roman coronations.
Detail of the imperial coronation mantle, drawing from 1857
Candidates for the kingship were at first the heads of Germanicstem duchies. As these units broke up, rulers of smaller principalities and even non-Germanic rulers were considered for the position. The only requirements generally observed were that the candidate be an adult male, a Catholic Christian, and not in holy orders. The kings were elected by severalImperial Estates (secular princes as well asPrince-Bishops), often in theimperial city ofFrankfurt after 1147, acustom recorded in theSchwabenspiegel code in about 1275.
After his election, the new king would be crowned as King of the Romans (Romanorum Rex), usually at Charlemagne's throne inAachen Cathedral by the Archbishop of Cologne in a solemnly celebrated ceremony. The details of Otto's coronation in 936 are described by the medieval chroniclerWidukind of Corvey in hisRes gestae saxonicae. The kings received theImperial Crown from at least 1024, at the coronation ofConrad II. In 1198 theHohenstaufen candidatePhilip of Swabia was crownedRex Romanorum atMainz Cathedral (as was KingRupert centuries later), but he had another coronation in Aachen after he had prevailed against hisWelf rivalOtto IV.
At some time after the ceremony, the king would, if possible, cross theAlps, to receive coronation inPavia orMilan with theIron Crown of Lombardy asKing of Italy. Finally, he would travel to Rome and be crowned Emperor by the Pope. Because it was rarely possible for the elected King to proceed immediately to Rome for his crowning, several years might elapse between election and coronation, and some Kings never completed the journey to Rome at all. As a suitable title for the King between his election and his coronation as Emperor,Romanorum Rex would stress the plenitude of his authority over the Empire and his warrant to be future Emperor (Imperator futurus) without infringing upon the Papal privilege.
Not all Kings of the Romans made this step, sometimes because of hostile relations with the Pope, or because either the pressure of business at home or warfare in Germany or Italy made it impossible for the King to make the journey. In such cases, the king might retain the title "King of the Romans" for his entire reign.
The titleRomanorum Rex ceased to be used for ruling kings after 1508, when the Pope permitted KingMaximilian I to use the title ofElectus Romanorum Imperator ("elected Emperor of the Romans") after he failed in agood-faith attempt to journey to Rome. At this time Maximilian also took the new title "King in Germania" (Germaniae rex,König in Germanien), but the latter was never used as a primary title.[1]
Maximilian's titles read, in part: "Maximilian von Gots genaden erwelter Romischer Romischer kayser, zu allen zeiten merer des Reichs, in Germanien zu Hungern, Dalmatien, Croatien etc. kunig […] ("Maximilian, by God's grace Elected Roman Emperor, always Augustus, in Germany, of Hungary, Dalamatia, Croatia etc King […]"[2]
Beginning withFerdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor, the rulers of the Empire no longer sought the Imperial coronation by the Pope and styled themselves "Emperors" without Papal approval, taking the title as soon as they were crowned in Germany or, if crowned in their predecessor's lifetime, upon the death of a sitting Emperor.
TheHoly Roman Empire was anelective monarchy. No person had an automatic legal right to the succession simply because he was related to the current Emperor. However, the Emperor could, and often did, have a relative (usually a son) elected to succeed him after his death. This electedheir apparent bore the title "King of the Romans".
During the Middle Ages, a junior King of the Romans was normally chosen only when the senior ruler bore the title of Emperor, so as to avoid having two, theoretically equal kings. Only on one occasion (1147–1150) was there both a ruling King of the Romans (KingConrad III) and a King of the Romans as heir (Henry Berengar). This practice continued from the 16th century onwards as the rulers of the Empire assumed the title "Emperor elect" without Imperial coronation by the Pope. The title of a King of the Romans now exclusively refers to the elected successor during his predecessor's lifetime.
The election was in the same form as that of the senior ruler. In practice, however, the actual administration of the Empire was always managed by the Emperor (or Emperor elect), with at most certain duties delegated to the heir.
WhenNapoleon I, Emperor of the French, had a son and heir,Napoleon II (1811–32), he introduced the title asKing of Rome (Roi de Rome), styling his son as such at birth. The boy was often known colloquially by this title throughout his short life. However, from 1818 onward, he was styled officially as theDuke of Reichstadt by his maternal grandfather, EmperorFrancis I of Austria.
The following list shows all individuals bearing the title "Kings of the Romans". The regnal dates given are those between a king's election as "King of the Romans" and either becoming Emperor or ending their reign by deposition or death.Ruling kings are coloured in yellow, while those whose claim to the throne failed to achieve widespread support are coloured in pink. Individuals that bore the title "Kings of the Romans" solely asheirs designate are coloured in silver. '* ' indicates that the king in question was elected in his predecessor's lifetime.
^abElisabeth Rothmund:Heinrich Schütz (1585–1672). Kulturpatriotismus und deutsche weltliche Vokalmusik. "Zum Auffnehmen der Music, auch Vermehrung unserer Nation Ruhm", 2004, p. 79; H. Weisert:Der Reichstitel bis 1806. In:Archiv für Diplomatik, Schriftgeschichte, Siegel- und Wappenkunde 4 (1994), 441–513 (p. 449).
^Ernest Troger, Georg Zwanowetz (ed.):Neue Beiträge zur geschichtlichen Landeskunde Tirols. Festschrift für Univ. Prof. Dr. Franz Huter anlässlich der Vollendung des 70. Lebensjahres. Wagner, Innsbruck 1969, p. 269.
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (2018).The Holy Roman Empire: a Short History. translated and with a preface by Yair Mintzker. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.ISBN978-1-4008-9026-2.
H. Beumann:Rex Romanorum, in:Lexikon des Mittelalters (Dictionary of the Middle Ages, 9 vols., Munich-Zürich 1980–98), vol. 7, col. 777 f.