Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Proto-Euphratean language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hypothetical unclassified language of late Neolithic Mesopotamia
Proto-Euphratean
RegionsouthernIraq
EthnicitySamarra culture?
EraEarlyUbaid period (5500-4800 BCE)
Language codes
ISO 639-3None (mis)
GlottologNone

Proto-Euphratean is a hypotheticalunclassified language or languages which was considered by someAssyriologists (such asSamuel Noah Kramer) to be thesubstratum language of the people who introduced farming into SouthernIraq in the EarlyUbaid period (5300–4700 BC).

Igor Dyakonov andVladislav Ardzinba identified these hypothetical languages with theSamarran culture.[1]

Benno Landsberger and other Assyriologists argued that by examining the structure ofSumerian names of occupations, as well as toponyms andhydronyms, one can suggest that there was once an earlier group of people in the region who spoke an entirely different language, often referred to as Proto-Euphratean. Terms for "farmer", "smith", "carpenter", and "date" (the fruit) do not appear to have a Sumerian orSemitic origin.[vague]

Dyakonov and Ardzinba proposed a different term, "banana languages", based on a characteristic feature of multiple personal names attested in Sumerian texts, namelyreduplication of syllables (as in the English wordbanana):Inanna,Zababa, Chuwawa/Humbaba,Bunene,Pazuzu, etc found in Sumerian, Akkadian, Assyrian and Babylonian texts. The same feature was attested in some other unclassified languages, includingMinoan. The same feature is allegedly attested by several names ofHyksos rulers:[example needed] although the Hyksos tribes were Semitic Canaanites, some of their names, like Bnon,Apophis, etc. were apparently non-Semitic in origin.[2]

Rubio challenged thesubstratum hypothesis, arguing that there is evidence of borrowing from more than one language. This theory is now predominant in the field (Piotr Michalowski, Gerd Steiner, etc.).

A related proposal by Gordon Whittaker[3] is that the language of the proto-literary texts from the LateUruk period (c. 3350–3100 BC) is an earlyIndo-European language that he terms "Euphratic", although this does not have mainstream support.

References

[edit]
  1. ^История древнего Востока, т.2. М. 1988. (in Russian: History of Ancient Orient, Vol. 2. Moscow 1988. Published by the Soviet Academy of Science), chapter III.
  2. ^История древнего Востока, т.2. М. 1988. (in Russian: History of Ancient Orient, Vol. 2. Moscow 1988. Published by the Soviet Academy of Science), p. 229.
  3. ^Whittaker, Gordon (2008)."The Case for Euphratic"(PDF).Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences.2 (3). Tbilisi:156–168. Retrieved11 December 2012.

Literature

[edit]
Stub icon

Thisancient Near East–related article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it.

Europe
West Asia
Caucasus
South Asia
East Asia
Indian Ocean rim
North Asia
"Paleosiberian"
OtherNorth Asia
Proposed groupings
Arunachal
East and Southeast Asia
Substrata
  • Families initalics have no living members.
  • Families with more than 30 languages are inbold.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proto-Euphratean_language&oldid=1267076826"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp