Part ofa series on | |||||||
Feminism | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | |||||||
| |||||||
Concepts
| |||||||
By continent/country
| |||||||
Lists and categories
| |||||||
![]() | |||||||
Political lesbianism is a phenomenon withinfeminism, primarilysecond-wave feminism andradical feminism; it includes, but is not limited to,lesbian separatism. Political lesbianism asserts thatsexual orientation is a political and feminist choice, and advocateslesbianism as a positive alternative toheterosexuality for women[1] as part of the struggle againstsexism.[2]
Political lesbianism originated in the late 1960s among "second-wave" radical feminists as a way to fight sexism andcompulsory heterosexuality.Sheila Jeffreys helped to develop the concept when she co-wrote in 1981 "Love Your Enemy? The Debate Between Heterosexual Feminism and Political Lesbianism"[3] with theLeeds Revolutionary Feminist Group. They argued that women should abandon support of heterosexuality and stop sleeping with men, while encouraging women to rid men "from your beds and your heads".[4] While the main idea of political lesbianism is to be separate from men, this does not necessarily mean that political lesbians arerequired to have sex with women.[5] According to theLeeds Revolutionary Feminist Group, the definition of a political lesbian is "awoman-identified woman who does not fuck men". They proclaimed men the enemy and women who were in relationships with them collaborators and complicit in their own oppression.[5] Heterosexual behavior is seen as the basic unit of thepatriarchy's political structure, and therefore lesbians who reject heterosexual behavior are disrupting the established political system.[6]
Ti-Grace Atkinson, a radical feminist who helped to found the groupThe Feminists, is credited with the phrase that came to embody the movement: "Feminism is the theory; lesbianism is the practice."[7][8]
Feminism provided a platform for some women to come out of a perceived suffocating shell ofheterosexual norms, traditionalsexuality,marriage and family life, a life viewed by some feminists as one of hard labor with little consideration and a system that subordinates women. By coming out of dominating heterosexual relationships,women are given an opportunity to declare themselves as lesbians with shared interests. As a result, feminism would be able to provide an environment in which lesbianism was not focused on personal pain or anguish, but was instead framed as an important political issue.[9]
In a broad sense,political lesbianism entails the political identification of women with other women; it encompasses a role beyond sexuality and supports eschewing forming relationships with men. It is partly based on the idea that women sharing and promoting a common interest creates a positive and needed energy which is necessary to enhance and elevate the role of women in the society, a development which will be curtailed by the institutions of heterosexuality andsexism if women choose the traditional norms.[5][2]
Though there has historically been discrimination against lesbians within the feminist movement, the movement still ended up providing a needed political platform for them. In its wake, it also expanded and introduced divergent views of sexuality.[10]
Separatist feminism is a form of radical feminism that holds that opposition topatriarchy is best done through focusing exclusively on women and girls.[11] Generally, separatist feminists do not believe that men can make positive contributions to thefeminist movement, and that even well-intentioned men replicate the dynamics of patriarchy.[12] In a similar vein, lesbian separatism advocated for the separation of lesbian women from what they characterize as a heterosexist, sexist society.[13][14]
Charlotte Bunch, an early member ofThe Furies Collective, viewed lesbian separatism as a strategy, a "first step" period, or temporary withdrawal from mainstream activism to accomplish specific goals or enhancepersonal growth.[15] Members of The Furies Collective recommended that lesbian separatists relate "only (with) women who cut their ties tomale privilege"[16] and suggest that "as long as women still benefit from heterosexuality, receive its privileges and security, they will at some point have to betray their sisters, especially Lesbian sisters who do not receive those benefits".[16]
Some feminist theory on sexuality evadedbiological fixation and embracedsocial construction as the basis of sexuality. However, this idea posed further questions on the subject of sexuality and lesbianism, and the long term sustainability of a purely lesbian society without men or children. If sexuality could be a construction ofhuman nature, then little room is given to understanding the nature of the historical formation of human nature, especially, if the historical nature of man or woman enhanced heterosexuality.[10]
A lack oftheoretical clarity of lesbianism and sexuality becomes more profound as sexuality is viewed as much more than choice.[17][18] Also, if lesbianism becomes asocial institution, the avenue for a dominant persona in the relationships may also pose challenge to the original intention of political lesbianism.
According toA Dictionary of Gender Studies, some lesbians who believed themselves to be 'born that way' considered political lesbians or those who believe lesbianism is a choice based on institutionalized heterosexuality were appropriating the term 'lesbian' and not experiencing or speaking out against the oppression that those women experience.[19] Additionally, some feminists argue that "political lesbianism," which reduces lesbianism as a political choice to reject men and thepenises, overlooks the deeply personal nature of lesbianism as an expression of attraction between women and erases the experiences oftrans women and their lesbian partners.[20]
We do think that all feminists can and should be political lesbians. Our definition of a political lesbian is a woman-identified woman who does not fuck men. It does not mean compulsory sexual activity with women.