When the cardinals assembled, they faced a dilemma. Should they choose a pope who would continue to espouse Pius IX'sreactionary religious and political views, and would continue to refuse to accept Italy'sLaw of Guarantees guaranteeing the pope religious liberty in theKingdom of Italy? Or should they turn away from the policies of Pius IX and choose a more liberal pope who could work for reconciliation with the king of Italy? Would choosing such a policy be seen as a betrayal of Pius IX, the self-proclaimed "prisoner in the Vatican"?
Other broader issues included Church-State relations in Italy, theThird French Republic, Ireland and the United States; theheresy Leo XIII later calledAmericanism; divisions in the Church caused by the proclamation ofpapal infallibility by theFirst Vatican Council; and the status of theFirst Vatican Council, which had been halted suddenly and never concluded. The length of Pius IX's reign suggested[how?] the cardinals give special consideration to the age and health of the man they elected.
With what many churchmen believed was the "unstable" and "anti-Catholic" situation in a Rome that was no longer controlled by the Church, some cardinals, notably Cardinal Manning, Archbishop of Westminster, urged that the conclave be moved outside Rome, perhaps even to Malta.[1] However,Camerlengo Gioacchino Pecci advocated otherwise, and an initial vote among cardinals to move to Spain was overturned in a later vote. The conclave finally assembled in theSistine Chapel in theVatican on 18 February 1878.
Going into the conclave, Cardinal Pecci was the onecandidate favored to be elected, in part because many of the cardinals who headed to Rome had already decided to elect him.[2] In addition to Pecci's competent administration as camerlengo during the briefsede vacante period up to the conclave, Pecci was seen as the opposite of Pope Pius IX in terms of manner and temperament, and had also had a successful diplomatic career prior to being archbishop-bishop of Perugia.[2] Pecci's election was also facilitated in thatAlessandro Franchi, the candidate favored by the conservatives, urged his supporters to switch their support to the camerlengo.[2]
One account reported the voting tabulations without providing its source.[3]
The election of Cardinal Pecci, who took the nameLeo XIII, was a victory for the liberals. Pecci had been an effective bishop whose diocese had moved from the Papal States to the Kingdom of Italy successfully, without Church problems. He was seen as a diplomatic pragmatist with the tact and flexibility opponents of the previous pope believed Pius IX lacked. At 68, Leo was also young enough to do the job without hindrance of health problems but old enough to offer the prospect of a relatively short reign of ten to fifteen years. Whereas Pius IX was seen as having isolated the Church from international opinion (his confining Jews inghettos and his treatment of minorities had been condemned by world leaders such asGladstone), Leo was seen as an "internationalist" who could earn back the Vatican some international respect.
Though always seemingly in poor health and delicate condition, Leo reigned for 25 years. He had the third longest reign of any pope until that time. Leo XIII was later surpassed byPope John Paul II, who reigned for 26 years and six months from his election in October 1978 to his death in April of 2005. When Leo XIII died on 20 July 1903 at the age of 93, he had lived to be older than any of his known predecessors.
^Hittinger, Russell (2006)."Pope Leo XIII". In Witte, John; Alexander, Frank S. (eds.).The Teachings of Modern Christianity on Law, Politics, and Human Nature. Columbia University Press. pp. 42–2.ISBN9780231133586.
^abcPirie, Valérie (1935)."Leo XIII and His Successors".The Triple Crown: An Account of the Papal Conclaves. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.